Automation Integration · head to head
Cyclr vs n8n

Cyclr
Automation Integration
Embedded integration platform that SaaS vendors ship inside their own product
- From
- $1595/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only n8n has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Cyclr entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.; n8n starter tier limited to 1 project and 5 concurrent executions
- They diverge on capability: Cyclr covers White-label integration UI, n8n covers Workflow automation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cyclr and n8n actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cyclr
- White-label integration UI
- Connector library
- Workflow builder
- Custom connectors
- Regional hosting
- MCP server offering
- Usage metering
- Templates
Only in n8n
- Workflow automation
- Visual editor
- Conditional execution
- Looping
- Error handling
- Scheduling
- Webhooks
- REST API
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cyclr
- A mid-market SaaS vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a CRM integration it has not builtnot n8n
- A product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectorsnot n8n
- A European software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the EU for procurement reasonsnot n8n
- A vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connectornot n8n
n8n
- Building AI agents and workflow automation for technical teamsnot Cyclr
- Visual workflow design with capability to write custom JavaScript or Python codenot Cyclr
- Enterprise deployments with self-hosted or cloud optionsnot Cyclr
- Integrating 500+ pre-built applications with custom API connectionsnot Cyclr
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cyclr
- Entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.
- Connectors and API calls are metered separately, so a successful integration marketplace pushes you up tiers as your customers adopt it, meaning the cost rises with usage rather than with the revenue that usage generates.
- Custom connectors to APIs outside the library are your work to build and maintain, so the promise of not building integrations only holds for applications Cyclr already covers.
- Debugging is harder when the integration runs in a third-party runtime, because your support team sees a failed workflow rather than an HTTP response and has to escalate to Cyclr for anything non-obvious.
- Deep embedding creates real switching cost: your customers' live integrations run on Cyclr, so migrating later means recreating every customer workflow, which in practice means you rarely leave.
n8n
- Starter tier limited to 1 project and 5 concurrent executions
- Starter and Pro tiers restricted to Cloud hosting only, not self-hosted
- Business tier requires 6 months minimum commitment at €667/month
- SSO/SAML/LDAP authentication requires Business or Enterprise tier
- Dedicated support with SLA available only on Enterprise plan
Pricing, plan by plan
Cyclr
$1595/month- PAYG$1595/month
- 100,000 API calls included
- 1 connector included
- Unlimited integrations and users
- Growth$2595/month
- 1,000,000 API calls included
- 10 connectors included
- Everything in PAYG
- Scale$7195/month
- 5,000,000 API calls included
- Unlimited connectors
- Everything in Growth
- Private Cloud$undefined/month
- Dedicated hosting in US, UK or EU
- Configurable processing and runtime
- Quoted pricing
n8n
Free- CommunityFree
- Free self-hosted version on GitHub
- Open source
- Starter$20/month
- 2,500 workflow executions
- 5 concurrent executions
- 2,300 AI credits/month
- Pro$50/month
- 10,000 workflow executions
- 20 concurrent executions
- 13,700 AI credits/month
- Business$667/month
- 40,000 workflow executions
- Self-hosted option
- 6 shared projects
Which should you pick?
Choose Cyclr if
- You need white-label integration ui.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want connector library.
Choose n8n if
- You need workflow automation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Docker, Self-hosted.
- You also want visual editor.
Questions people ask
- Is Cyclr or n8n better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cyclr starts at $1595/month and n8n at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cyclr or n8n?
- n8n has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $1595/month for Cyclr and Free for n8n.
- Does Cyclr or n8n run on more platforms?
- Cyclr runs on Web, API. n8n runs on Web, Docker, Self-hosted.
- Can I use n8n for free?
- Yes. n8n has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Cyclr starts at $1595/month.
- What is Cyclr best used for?
- Cyclr is most often used for a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built, a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors, a european software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the eu for procurement reasons, a vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connector. Of those, a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built and a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors are not what n8n is typically brought in for.
- What can Cyclr do that n8n cannot?
- Cyclr covers White-label integration UI, Connector library, Workflow builder, Custom connectors. n8n covers Workflow automation, Visual editor, Conditional execution, Looping.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cyclr: What does Cyclr actually cost?
Published tiers start at 1,595 US dollars per month for 100,000 API calls and one connector, rising to 7,195 for unlimited connectors and five million calls.
n8n: Is there a free version of n8n?
Yes, n8n Community Edition is free and open-source, available for self-hosting on GitHub with unlimited users and workflows.
SourceCyclr: Do my customers know they are using Cyclr?
No. The interface is white-labelled to appear as part of your product.
n8n: What is the difference between n8n plans?
Plans differ by monthly workflow executions (2,500 for Starter, 10,000 for Pro, 40,000 for Business), concurrent execution limits, AI credits, and shared project counts.
SourceCyclr: Can I host it in the EU or UK?
Yes, on the private cloud tiers, which matters for European procurement requirements.
n8n: Does n8n offer annual billing discounts?
Yes, n8n offers 17% off when billing annually instead of monthly, and provides a Startup Plan at 50% off Business pricing for companies under 20 employees.
SourceCyclr: What if the connector I need does not exist?
You build a custom connector using Cyclr tooling, which is work you own rather than work the platform removes.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cyclr vs Tray.io
- Cyclr vs Celigo
- Cyclr vs Workato
- Cyclr vs Alloy Automation
- Cyclr vs Paragon
- Cyclr vs Nango
- Cyclr vs Merge
- Cyclr vs Hatchet
- Cyclr vs Zapier
- Cyclr vs MuleSoft
- Cyclr vs Dagster
- Cyclr vs Fivetran
- Cyclr vs Informatica
- Cyclr vs Integromat
- Cyclr vs jBPM
- Cyclr vs Kogito
- Cyclr vs Letta
- Cyclr vs Lytics
- Cyclr vs Activiti
- Cyclr vs Parabola
- Cyclr vs Automate.io
- Cyclr vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Cyclr vs Nintex
- Cyclr vs Autonoly
- Cyclr vs Prefect
- Cyclr vs Automation Anywhere
- Cyclr vs Blue Prism
- Cyclr vs CrewAI
- Cyclr vs Mage AI
- n8n vs Tray.io
- n8n vs Celigo
- n8n vs Workato
- n8n vs Alloy Automation
- n8n vs Paragon
- n8n vs Nango
- n8n vs Merge
- n8n vs Hatchet
- n8n vs Zapier
- n8n vs MuleSoft
- n8n vs Dagster
- n8n vs Fivetran
- n8n vs Informatica
- n8n vs Integromat
- n8n vs jBPM
- n8n vs Kogito
- n8n vs Letta
- n8n vs Lytics
- n8n vs Activiti
- n8n vs Parabola
- n8n vs Automate.io
- n8n vs Microsoft Power Automate
- n8n vs Nintex
- n8n vs Autonoly
- n8n vs Prefect
- n8n vs Automation Anywhere
- n8n vs Blue Prism
- n8n vs CrewAI
- n8n vs Mage AI

