Automation Integration · head to head
Cyclr vs Microsoft Power Automate

Cyclr
Automation Integration
Embedded integration platform that SaaS vendors ship inside their own product
- From
- $1595/month
- Rated
- -

Microsoft Power Automate
Automation Integration
Automate tasks across cloud and on-premises apps
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Microsoft Power Automate has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Cyclr entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.; Microsoft Power Automate free plan limited to 750 flow runs/month and standard connectors only; premium connectors require paid plans
- They diverge on capability: Cyclr covers White-label integration UI, Microsoft Power Automate covers Automated flows.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cyclr and Microsoft Power Automate actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cyclr | Microsoft Power Automate |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $1595/month | Free |
| Pricing model | Per month by API call volume | Unknown |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, API | Web, Cloud, Desktop |
| Founded | Unknown | 2016 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cyclr
- White-label integration UI
- Connector library
- Workflow builder
- Custom connectors
- Regional hosting
- MCP server offering
- Usage metering
- Templates
Only in Microsoft Power Automate
- Automated flows
- Instant flows
- Scheduled flows
- Desktop automation
- Process mining
- Business process flows
- Approval workflows
- 500+ connectors
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cyclr
- A mid-market SaaS vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a CRM integration it has not builtnot Microsoft Power Automate
- A product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectorsnot Microsoft Power Automate
- A European software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the EU for procurement reasonsnot Microsoft Power Automate
- A vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connectornot Microsoft Power Automate
Microsoft Power Automate
- Workflow Automationnot Cyclr
- Data Integrationnot Cyclr
- Process Automationnot Cyclr
- App Integrationnot Cyclr
- API Connectivitynot Cyclr
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cyclr
- Entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.
- Connectors and API calls are metered separately, so a successful integration marketplace pushes you up tiers as your customers adopt it, meaning the cost rises with usage rather than with the revenue that usage generates.
- Custom connectors to APIs outside the library are your work to build and maintain, so the promise of not building integrations only holds for applications Cyclr already covers.
- Debugging is harder when the integration runs in a third-party runtime, because your support team sees a failed workflow rather than an HTTP response and has to escalate to Cyclr for anything non-obvious.
- Deep embedding creates real switching cost: your customers' live integrations run on Cyclr, so migrating later means recreating every customer workflow, which in practice means you rarely leave.
Microsoft Power Automate
- Free plan limited to 750 flow runs/month and standard connectors only; premium connectors require paid plans
- Not suitable for long-running workflows; can fail unexpectedly without warning
- Limited to simple linear logic; fails with complex workflows involving multiple stakeholders
- Tasks cannot automate at scale when requiring more than approximately 60 users
Pricing, plan by plan
Cyclr
$1595/month- PAYG$1595/month
- 100,000 API calls included
- 1 connector included
- Unlimited integrations and users
- Growth$2595/month
- 1,000,000 API calls included
- 10 connectors included
- Everything in PAYG
- Scale$7195/month
- 5,000,000 API calls included
- Unlimited connectors
- Everything in Growth
- Private Cloud$undefined/month
- Dedicated hosting in US, UK or EU
- Configurable processing and runtime
- Quoted pricing
Microsoft Power Automate
Free- FreeFree
- 750 flow runs/month
- Standard connectors only
- Basic cloud flows
- Premium$15/user/month
- Cloud flows (DPA)
- Attended RPA
- 250 MB Dataverse database
- Process$150/bot/month
- Unattended automation
- Cloud and desktop flows
- 50 MB Dataverse database
- Hosted Process$215/bot/month
- Microsoft-managed virtual machine
- Unattended automation
- Same Dataverse entitlements as Process plan
Which should you pick?
Choose Cyclr if
- You need white-label integration ui.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want connector library.
Choose Microsoft Power Automate if
- You need automated flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Cloud, Desktop.
- You also want instant flows.
Questions people ask
- Is Cyclr or Microsoft Power Automate better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cyclr starts at $1595/month and Microsoft Power Automate at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cyclr or Microsoft Power Automate?
- Microsoft Power Automate has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $1595/month for Cyclr and Free for Microsoft Power Automate.
- Does Cyclr or Microsoft Power Automate run on more platforms?
- Cyclr runs on Web, API. Microsoft Power Automate runs on Web, Cloud, Desktop.
- Can I use Microsoft Power Automate for free?
- Yes. Microsoft Power Automate has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Cyclr starts at $1595/month.
- What is Cyclr best used for?
- Cyclr is most often used for a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built, a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors, a european software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the eu for procurement reasons, a vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connector. Of those, a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built and a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors are not what Microsoft Power Automate is typically brought in for.
- What can Cyclr do that Microsoft Power Automate cannot?
- Cyclr covers White-label integration UI, Connector library, Workflow builder, Custom connectors. Microsoft Power Automate covers Automated flows, Instant flows, Scheduled flows, Desktop automation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cyclr: What does Cyclr actually cost?
Published tiers start at 1,595 US dollars per month for 100,000 API calls and one connector, rising to 7,195 for unlimited connectors and five million calls.
Microsoft Power Automate: Is Power Automate included with Microsoft 365?
Yes. If you have an eligible Microsoft 365 subscription, you can use Power Automate at no extra cost for flows relying only on standard connectors (SharePoint, Outlook, Teams). Premium connectors (Salesforce, SAP, Oracle) require paid plans.
SourceCyclr: Do my customers know they are using Cyclr?
No. The interface is white-labelled to appear as part of your product.
Microsoft Power Automate: How many flow runs are allowed on the free plan?
Power Automate's free tier (included with Microsoft 365) is limited to 750 flow runs per month and standard connectors only. Out of 900+ total connectors, the free plan only includes Microsoft ecosystem apps and limited third-party apps.
SourceCyclr: Can I host it in the EU or UK?
Yes, on the private cloud tiers, which matters for European procurement requirements.
Microsoft Power Automate: What's the difference between Premium and Process plans?
Premium ($15/user/month) provides attended automation with cloud flows and standard RPA. Process plan ($150/bot/month) enables unattended automation where bots run without human intervention on virtual machines for high-volume, repetitive tasks.
SourceCyclr: What if the connector I need does not exist?
You build a custom connector using Cyclr tooling, which is work you own rather than work the platform removes.
Microsoft Power Automate: Does Power Automate support long-running workflows?
No. Power Automate is not suitable for long-lasting workflows because they can run without warning and fail unexpectedly. The platform is built for linear, branching logic (if-then) rather than complex, multi-step business processes involving multiple stakeholders.
SourceRelated pages
More on Microsoft Power Automate
Other head to heads
- Cyclr vs Tray.io
- Cyclr vs Celigo
- Cyclr vs Workato
- Cyclr vs Alloy Automation
- Cyclr vs Paragon
- Cyclr vs Nango
- Cyclr vs Merge
- Cyclr vs Hatchet
- Cyclr vs Zapier
- Cyclr vs MuleSoft
- Cyclr vs Dagster
- Cyclr vs Fivetran
- Cyclr vs Informatica
- Cyclr vs Integromat
- Cyclr vs jBPM
- Cyclr vs Kogito
- Cyclr vs Letta
- Cyclr vs Lytics
- Cyclr vs Nintex
- Cyclr vs Talend
- Cyclr vs Boomi
- Cyclr vs Jitterbit
- Cyclr vs Salesforce Flows
- Cyclr vs Automate.io
- Cyclr vs SnapLogic
- Cyclr vs Hightouch
- Cyclr vs Pipedream
- Cyclr vs Windmill
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Tray.io
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Celigo
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Workato
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Alloy Automation
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Paragon
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Nango
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Merge
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Hatchet
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Zapier
- Microsoft Power Automate vs MuleSoft
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Dagster
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Fivetran
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Informatica
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Integromat
- Microsoft Power Automate vs jBPM
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Kogito
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Letta
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Lytics
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Nintex
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Talend
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Boomi
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Jitterbit
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Salesforce Flows
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Automate.io
- Microsoft Power Automate vs SnapLogic
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Hightouch
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Pipedream
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Windmill
