Automation Integration · head to head
Cyclr vs Flowise

Cyclr
Automation Integration
Embedded integration platform that SaaS vendors ship inside their own product
- From
- $1595/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Flowise has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Cyclr entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.; Flowise enterprise tier requires custom pricing with no published rates
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cyclr and Flowise actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cyclr
- White-label integration UI
- Connector library
- Workflow builder
- Custom connectors
- Regional hosting
- MCP server offering
- Usage metering
- Templates
Only in Flowise
Nothing recorded that Cyclr does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cyclr
- A mid-market SaaS vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a CRM integration it has not builtnot Flowise
- A product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectorsnot Flowise
- A European software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the EU for procurement reasonsnot Flowise
- A vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connectornot Flowise
Flowise
- Building multi-agent systems with orchestrated workflowsnot Cyclr
- Creating chatbots that retrieve knowledge from uploaded documentsnot Cyclr
- Implementing human-in-the-loop approval for AI agent decisionsnot Cyclr
- Deploying conversational AI without writing backend codenot Cyclr
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cyclr
- Entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.
- Connectors and API calls are metered separately, so a successful integration marketplace pushes you up tiers as your customers adopt it, meaning the cost rises with usage rather than with the revenue that usage generates.
- Custom connectors to APIs outside the library are your work to build and maintain, so the promise of not building integrations only holds for applications Cyclr already covers.
- Debugging is harder when the integration runs in a third-party runtime, because your support team sees a failed workflow rather than an HTTP response and has to escalate to Cyclr for anything non-obvious.
- Deep embedding creates real switching cost: your customers' live integrations run on Cyclr, so migrating later means recreating every customer workflow, which in practice means you rarely leave.
Flowise
- Enterprise tier requires custom pricing with no published rates
Pricing, plan by plan
Cyclr
$1595/month- PAYG$1595/month
- 100,000 API calls included
- 1 connector included
- Unlimited integrations and users
- Growth$2595/month
- 1,000,000 API calls included
- 10 connectors included
- Everything in PAYG
- Scale$7195/month
- 5,000,000 API calls included
- Unlimited connectors
- Everything in Growth
- Private Cloud$undefined/month
- Dedicated hosting in US, UK or EU
- Configurable processing and runtime
- Quoted pricing
Flowise
Free- FreeFree
- 2 Flows & Assistants
- 100 predictions per month
- 5 MB storage
- Starter$35/month
- Unlimited flows & assistants
- 10,000 predictions per month
- 1 GB storage
- Pro$65/month
- 50,000 predictions per month
- 10 GB storage
- Unlimited workspaces
Which should you pick?
Choose Cyclr if
- You need white-label integration ui.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want connector library.
Questions people ask
- Is Cyclr or Flowise better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cyclr starts at $1595/month and Flowise at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cyclr or Flowise?
- Flowise has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $1595/month for Cyclr and Free for Flowise.
- Does Cyclr or Flowise run on more platforms?
- Cyclr runs on Web, API. Flowise runs on Web.
- Can I use Flowise for free?
- Yes. Flowise has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Cyclr starts at $1595/month.
- What is Cyclr best used for?
- Cyclr is most often used for a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built, a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors, a european software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the eu for procurement reasons, a vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connector. Of those, a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built and a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors are not what Flowise is typically brought in for.
- What can Cyclr do that Flowise cannot?
- Cyclr covers White-label integration UI, Connector library, Workflow builder, Custom connectors.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cyclr: What does Cyclr actually cost?
Published tiers start at 1,595 US dollars per month for 100,000 API calls and one connector, rising to 7,195 for unlimited connectors and five million calls.
Flowise: Does Flowise have a free tier?
Yes, Flowise offers a free plan with 2 flows and assistants, 100 predictions per month, 5 MB storage, and community support.
SourceCyclr: Do my customers know they are using Cyclr?
No. The interface is white-labelled to appear as part of your product.
Flowise: What is Flowise's Starter plan pricing?
The Starter plan costs $35 per month (first month free) and includes unlimited flows and assistants, 10,000 predictions per month, and 1 GB storage.
SourceCyclr: Can I host it in the EU or UK?
Yes, on the private cloud tiers, which matters for European procurement requirements.
Flowise: How does Flowise charge for additional users?
Additional users on the Pro plan cost $15 per user per month. The Pro plan supports 5+ users with this per-user add-on pricing.
SourceCyclr: What if the connector I need does not exist?
You build a custom connector using Cyclr tooling, which is work you own rather than work the platform removes.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cyclr vs Tray.io
- Cyclr vs Celigo
- Cyclr vs Workato
- Cyclr vs Alloy Automation
- Cyclr vs Paragon
- Cyclr vs Nango
- Cyclr vs Merge
- Cyclr vs Hatchet
- Cyclr vs Zapier
- Cyclr vs MuleSoft
- Cyclr vs Dagster
- Cyclr vs Fivetran
- Cyclr vs Informatica
- Cyclr vs Integromat
- Cyclr vs jBPM
- Cyclr vs Kogito
- Cyclr vs Letta
- Cyclr vs Lytics
- Cyclr vs n8n
- Cyclr vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Cyclr vs Parabola
- Cyclr vs RudderStack
- Cyclr vs Windmill
- Cyclr vs Trigger.dev
- Cyclr vs Temporal
- Cyclr vs Airbyte
- Cyclr vs Inngest
- Flowise vs Tray.io
- Flowise vs Celigo
- Flowise vs Workato
- Flowise vs Alloy Automation
- Flowise vs Paragon
- Flowise vs Nango
- Flowise vs Merge
- Flowise vs Hatchet
- Flowise vs Zapier
- Flowise vs MuleSoft
- Flowise vs Dagster
- Flowise vs Fivetran
- Flowise vs Informatica
- Flowise vs Integromat
- Flowise vs jBPM
- Flowise vs Kogito
- Flowise vs Letta
- Flowise vs Lytics
- Flowise vs n8n
- Flowise vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Flowise vs Parabola
- Flowise vs RudderStack
- Flowise vs Windmill
- Flowise vs Trigger.dev
- Flowise vs Temporal
- Flowise vs Airbyte
- Flowise vs Inngest

