Software · head to head
Integromat vs Letta
The short version
- Only Integromat has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Integromat the free plan enforces a 15 minute minimum interval between runs, so nothing near real time is possible without paying; Letta the Developer API plan charges $0.10 per active agent per month plus $0.00015 per second of tool execution on top of a $20 per month base and pay-as-you-go LLM usage, as of August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Integromat and Letta actually diverge.
| Attribute | Integromat | Letta |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Web |
| Founded | 2013 | Unknown |
Identical on both: pricing model (usage-based), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Integromat
- Visual workflow builder
- Webhooks
- Data transformation
- Error handling
- Conditional logic
- Scheduling
- Team collaboration
- 1000+ apps
Only in Letta
Nothing recorded that Integromat does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Integromat
- Building automated workflows between SaaS applications without codenot Letta
- Moving and transforming data between tools on a schedule or triggernot Letta
Letta
No use cases recorded yet. See the Letta review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Integromat
- The free plan enforces a 15 minute minimum interval between runs, so nothing near real time is possible without paying
- Free is limited to 2 active scenarios, a 5 MB file size and 7 days of execution logs
- Billing is per credit where each module action counts as one, so a scenario with many steps consumes credits far faster than its run count suggests
- Make API access requires a paid plan
- Priority execution and full text log search are Pro features
- Overage protection is Enterprise only, so cheaper plans can run up charges
Letta
- The Developer API plan charges $0.10 per active agent per month plus $0.00015 per second of tool execution on top of a $20 per month base and pay-as-you-go LLM usage, as of August 2026.
Pricing, plan by plan
Integromat
Free- FreeFree
- 1000 operations
- 10 scenarios
- Core$10/month
- 10000 operations
- 100 scenarios
- Pro$25/month
- Unlimited operations
- Unlimited scenarios
Letta
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Letta review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Integromat if
- You need visual workflow builder.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want webhooks.
Choose Letta if
Nothing in the data separates Letta from Integromat on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Integromat or Letta better?
- Neither clearly leads. Integromat starts at Free and Letta at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Integromat or Letta?
- Integromat has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Integromat and On request for Letta.
- Does Integromat or Letta run on more platforms?
- Integromat runs on Web, Api. Letta runs on Web.
- Can I use Integromat for free?
- Yes. Integromat has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Letta starts at On request.
- What is Integromat best used for?
- Integromat is most often used for building automated workflows between saas applications without code, moving and transforming data between tools on a schedule or trigger. Of those, building automated workflows between saas applications without code and moving and transforming data between tools on a schedule or trigger are not what Letta is typically brought in for.
- What can Integromat do that Letta cannot?
- Integromat covers Visual workflow builder, Webhooks, Data transformation, Error handling.