Automation Integration · head to head
Cyclr vs Dagster

Cyclr
Automation Integration
Embedded integration platform that SaaS vendors ship inside their own product
- From
- $1595/month
- Rated
- -

Dagster
Automation Integration
Data orchestration platform with asset lineage and AI-native observability
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Dagster has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Cyclr entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.; Dagster learning curve steeper than simpler task schedulers
- They diverge on capability: Cyclr covers White-label integration UI, Dagster covers Asset-centric orchestration.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cyclr and Dagster actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cyclr
- White-label integration UI
- Connector library
- Workflow builder
- Custom connectors
- Regional hosting
- MCP server offering
- Usage metering
- Templates
Only in Dagster
- Asset-centric orchestration
- Lineage tracking
- Data quality monitoring
- Multi-tool integration
- Branch deployments
- Dagster+ AI
- Hybrid deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cyclr
- A mid-market SaaS vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a CRM integration it has not builtnot Dagster
- A product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectorsnot Dagster
- A European software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the EU for procurement reasonsnot Dagster
- A vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connectornot Dagster
Dagster
- Orchestrating multi-stage data transformation pipelinesnot Cyclr
- Tracking data lineage across transformation toolsnot Cyclr
- Monitoring data quality and asset healthnot Cyclr
- Coordinating dbt and Snowflake workflowsnot Cyclr
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cyclr
- Entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.
- Connectors and API calls are metered separately, so a successful integration marketplace pushes you up tiers as your customers adopt it, meaning the cost rises with usage rather than with the revenue that usage generates.
- Custom connectors to APIs outside the library are your work to build and maintain, so the promise of not building integrations only holds for applications Cyclr already covers.
- Debugging is harder when the integration runs in a third-party runtime, because your support team sees a failed workflow rather than an HTTP response and has to escalate to Cyclr for anything non-obvious.
- Deep embedding creates real switching cost: your customers' live integrations run on Cyclr, so migrating later means recreating every customer workflow, which in practice means you rarely leave.
Dagster
- Learning curve steeper than simpler task schedulers
- Asset-centric model requires redesigning existing task-based pipelines
- Pricing complex with per-credit costs on top of base fee
- Open-source version requires self-hosting infrastructure
- Limited to data workflows; not suitable for general automation
Pricing, plan by plan
Cyclr
$1595/month- PAYG$1595/month
- 100,000 API calls included
- 1 connector included
- Unlimited integrations and users
- Growth$2595/month
- 1,000,000 API calls included
- 10 connectors included
- Everything in PAYG
- Scale$7195/month
- 5,000,000 API calls included
- Unlimited connectors
- Everything in Growth
- Private Cloud$undefined/month
- Dedicated hosting in US, UK or EU
- Configurable processing and runtime
- Quoted pricing
Dagster
Free- Open SourceFree
- Self-hosted deployment
- Full orchestration engine
- Community support
- Solo$10/month
- 1 user and 1 code location
- Pay-as-you-go credits at $0.040 per credit
- 1 deployment
- Starter$100/month
- Up to 3 users and 5 code locations
- Better credit rate at $0.035 per credit
- 1 deployment
- Pro$null/custom
- Unlimited code locations and deployments
- Custom serverless compute pricing
- Personalized onboarding
Which should you pick?
Choose Cyclr if
- You need white-label integration ui.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want connector library.
Choose Dagster if
- You need asset-centric orchestration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Self-hosted.
- You also want lineage tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is Cyclr or Dagster better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cyclr starts at $1595/month and Dagster at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cyclr or Dagster?
- Dagster has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $1595/month for Cyclr and Free for Dagster.
- Does Cyclr or Dagster run on more platforms?
- Cyclr runs on Web, API. Dagster runs on Cloud, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Dagster for free?
- Yes. Dagster has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Cyclr starts at $1595/month.
- What is Cyclr best used for?
- Cyclr is most often used for a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built, a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors, a european software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the eu for procurement reasons, a vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connector. Of those, a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built and a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors are not what Dagster is typically brought in for.
- What can Cyclr do that Dagster cannot?
- Cyclr covers White-label integration UI, Connector library, Workflow builder, Custom connectors. Dagster covers Asset-centric orchestration, Lineage tracking, Data quality monitoring, Multi-tool integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cyclr: What does Cyclr actually cost?
Published tiers start at 1,595 US dollars per month for 100,000 API calls and one connector, rising to 7,195 for unlimited connectors and five million calls.
Dagster: What does Solo plan at $10/month include?
Solo includes 1 user, 1 code location, 1 deployment, and serverless compute at $0.010/minute, with 30-day free trial.
SourceCyclr: Do my customers know they are using Cyclr?
No. The interface is white-labelled to appear as part of your product.
Dagster: How are credits calculated on Dagster+?
Each asset materialization and ops execution costs 1 credit. Solo plan charges $0.040 per credit; Starter reduces to $0.035 per credit.
SourceCyclr: Can I host it in the EU or UK?
Yes, on the private cloud tiers, which matters for European procurement requirements.
Dagster: Is Dagster open-source available for free?
Yes, Dagster open-source is free and includes the full orchestration engine for self-hosted deployment with community support.
SourceCyclr: What if the connector I need does not exist?
You build a custom connector using Cyclr tooling, which is work you own rather than work the platform removes.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cyclr vs Tray.io
- Cyclr vs Celigo
- Cyclr vs Workato
- Cyclr vs Alloy Automation
- Cyclr vs Paragon
- Cyclr vs Nango
- Cyclr vs Merge
- Cyclr vs Hatchet
- Cyclr vs Zapier
- Cyclr vs MuleSoft
- Cyclr vs Fivetran
- Cyclr vs Informatica
- Cyclr vs Integromat
- Cyclr vs jBPM
- Cyclr vs Kogito
- Cyclr vs Letta
- Cyclr vs Lytics
- Cyclr vs Mage AI
- Cyclr vs Prefect
- Cyclr vs Meltano
- Cyclr vs Temporal
- Cyclr vs Parabola
- Cyclr vs Browserbase
- Cyclr vs Census
- Cyclr vs Relevance AI
- Cyclr vs Xano
- Cyclr vs RudderStack
- Cyclr vs Blue Prism
- Cyclr vs Orkes
- Cyclr vs Polytomic
- Cyclr vs Salesforce Flows
- Cyclr vs SnapLogic
- Dagster vs Tray.io
- Dagster vs Celigo
- Dagster vs Workato
- Dagster vs Alloy Automation
- Dagster vs Paragon
- Dagster vs Nango
- Dagster vs Merge
- Dagster vs Hatchet
- Dagster vs Zapier
- Dagster vs MuleSoft
- Dagster vs Fivetran
- Dagster vs Informatica
- Dagster vs Integromat
- Dagster vs jBPM
- Dagster vs Kogito
- Dagster vs Letta
- Dagster vs Lytics
- Dagster vs Mage AI
- Dagster vs Prefect
- Dagster vs Meltano
- Dagster vs Temporal
- Dagster vs Parabola
- Dagster vs Browserbase
- Dagster vs Census
- Dagster vs Relevance AI
- Dagster vs Xano
- Dagster vs RudderStack
- Dagster vs Blue Prism
- Dagster vs Orkes
- Dagster vs Polytomic
- Dagster vs Salesforce Flows
- Dagster vs SnapLogic
