Fleet Management · head to head
CalAmp vs Felt

CalAmp
Fleet Management
Fleet telematics hardware and software provider that went through Chapter 11 restructuring in 2024 and is now privately held by its former lender
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Felt
Maps
Collaborative browser mapping with a free non-commercial tier and annual-only paid contracts
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Felt has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: CalAmp the company underwent Chapter 11 restructuring and a change of ownership in 2024, and any multi-year contract should factor in the risk and uncertainty that follows a recent bankruptcy, even a fast one.; Felt felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process
- They diverge on capability: CalAmp covers GPS tracking hardware, Felt covers Real-time collaboration.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CalAmp and Felt actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (quote), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CalAmp
- GPS tracking hardware
- Telematics Cloud platform
- Driver behaviour monitoring
- Asset tracking
- Partner API access
- Diagnostic alerts
Only in Felt
- Real-time collaboration
- Drag and drop data
- Unlimited viewers
- Field app with offline support
- Dashboards
- Live cloud sources
- API and SDK
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CalAmp
- A software company or system integrator wanting telematics hardware and a data API to build a custom fleet application on top ofnot Felt
- A fleet needing basic GPS tracking, driver behaviour and diagnostic alerting without a full BI-grade analytics suitenot Felt
- An asset-heavy operation needing non-powered trailer and equipment tracking alongside vehicle telematicsnot Felt
- A buyer specifically wanting a hardware-plus-cloud vendor rather than a software-only platform layered on third-party devicesnot Felt
Felt
- An environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing GIS softwarenot CalAmp
- A utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking atnot CalAmp
- A planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncostednot CalAmp
- A team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a weeknot CalAmp
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CalAmp
- The company underwent Chapter 11 restructuring and a change of ownership in 2024, and any multi-year contract should factor in the risk and uncertainty that follows a recent bankruptcy, even a fast one.
- Pricing is entirely unpublished and combines hardware and subscription costs, making direct comparison against software-only telematics competitors harder to do cleanly.
- It has historically leaned on a software partner ecosystem rather than a single polished end-user product, so the buying experience and interface quality vary depending on which partner application sits on top of CalAmp data.
- Newer, well-capitalised competitors such as Samsara and Motive have captured significant market share with more unified hardware-software products, and CalAmp market position has weakened relative to them.
- As a private company since 2024, financial transparency that public-market buyers previously had access to (quarterly filings, analyst coverage) is now reduced.
Felt
- Felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process
- Paid tiers are annual contract only with no monthly option, which excludes consultancies that need a tool for a single short engagement and forces them to the free non-commercial tier they are not licensed to use for client work
- The API, JavaScript SDK and live warehouse connections are enterprise-only, so a mid-sized team that wants programmatic access has to buy the top tier rather than pay for one capability
- Analytical depth is limited: there is no meaningful geoprocessing, topology checking or model building, so Felt sits beside a real GIS rather than replacing one
- The Professional tier caps data processing at 25 GB a month and map views at 100,000 a month, which are easy to exceed with raster imagery or a public-facing map, and the overage terms are not published either
Pricing, plan by plan
CalAmp
On request- CalAmp Telematics Cloud$undefined/year
- Hardware and subscription priced together, no published rate
- Cost varies by device type, data plan and partner/direct sales channel
Felt
Free- PersonalFree
- Free forever for non-commercial mapping
- Map creation, upload and sharing
- Not licensed for commercial use
- Professional$undefined/year
- 10 full-access seats with unlimited viewers
- 25 GB of data processing per month
- 100,000 map views per month
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Live cloud sources including Postgres, Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks and S3
- REST API and JavaScript SDK
- AI features
Which should you pick?
Choose CalAmp if
- You need gps tracking hardware.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want telematics cloud platform.
Choose Felt if
- You need real-time collaboration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want drag and drop data.
Questions people ask
- Is CalAmp or Felt better?
- Neither clearly leads. CalAmp starts at On request and Felt at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CalAmp or Felt?
- Felt has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for CalAmp and Free for Felt.
- Does CalAmp or Felt run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Felt for free?
- Yes. Felt has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. CalAmp starts at On request.
- What is CalAmp best used for?
- CalAmp is most often used for a software company or system integrator wanting telematics hardware and a data api to build a custom fleet application on top of, a fleet needing basic gps tracking, driver behaviour and diagnostic alerting without a full bi-grade analytics suite, an asset-heavy operation needing non-powered trailer and equipment tracking alongside vehicle telematics, a buyer specifically wanting a hardware-plus-cloud vendor rather than a software-only platform layered on third-party devices. Of those, a software company or system integrator wanting telematics hardware and a data api to build a custom fleet application on top of and a fleet needing basic gps tracking, driver behaviour and diagnostic alerting without a full bi-grade analytics suite are not what Felt is typically brought in for.
- What can CalAmp do that Felt cannot?
- CalAmp covers GPS tracking hardware, Telematics Cloud platform, Driver behaviour monitoring, Asset tracking. Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Drag and drop data, Unlimited viewers, Field app with offline support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CalAmp: Is CalAmp still in business?
Yes. It completed a fast Chapter 11 restructuring in 2024, eliminating roughly $230 million in debt, and is now privately held by Lynrock Lake Master Fund LP.
Felt: What does Felt cost?
Felt does not publish prices for Professional or Enterprise. Personal is free but licensed for non-commercial use only.
CalAmp: Does CalAmp sell directly to fleets or through partners?
Both, but a significant part of its business is providing hardware and data APIs to software partners who build the end-user fleet application.
Felt: Can I pay monthly?
No. Paid plans are annual contracts. There is a 7 day trial of Professional.
CalAmp: Is pricing published?
No. Hardware and subscription costs are combined and quoted, varying by device type, data plan and sales channel.
Felt: Do viewers cost anything?
No. Viewer access is unlimited on the paid plans, which is the main reason organisations with large map audiences choose it.
Felt: Is there a nonprofit discount?
Yes, 30 per cent for verified United States nonprofits, and free access for verified students and classrooms.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CalAmp vs Motive
- CalAmp vs Samsara
- CalAmp vs Geotab
- CalAmp vs Fleet Complete
- CalAmp vs Quartix
- CalAmp vs Chevin FleetWave
- CalAmp vs GPS Trackit
- CalAmp vs Uptake
- CalAmp vs Verizon Connect
- CalAmp vs AssetWorks
- CalAmp vs Ridecell
- CalAmp vs Webfleet
- CalAmp vs Whip Around
- CalAmp vs Zonar Systems
- CalAmp vs Lytx
- CalAmp vs NexTraq
- CalAmp vs Esri ArcGIS
- CalAmp vs CARTO
- CalAmp vs QGIS
- CalAmp vs Atlas.co
- CalAmp vs Global Mapper
- CalAmp vs GRASS GIS
- CalAmp vs onX Maps
- CalAmp vs Ride with GPS
- CalAmp vs SW Maps
- CalAmp vs TomTom Developer Portal
- CalAmp vs Kepler.gl
- CalAmp vs Trailforks
- CalAmp vs AllTrails
- CalAmp vs Bing Maps
- CalAmp vs Cesium ion
- CalAmp vs Citymapper
- CalAmp vs ArcGIS Survey123
- CalAmp vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Felt vs Motive
- Felt vs Samsara
- Felt vs Geotab
- Felt vs Fleet Complete
- Felt vs Quartix
- Felt vs Chevin FleetWave
- Felt vs GPS Trackit
- Felt vs Uptake
- Felt vs Verizon Connect
- Felt vs AssetWorks
- Felt vs Ridecell
- Felt vs Webfleet
- Felt vs Whip Around
- Felt vs Zonar Systems
- Felt vs Lytx
- Felt vs NexTraq
- Felt vs Esri ArcGIS
- Felt vs CARTO
- Felt vs QGIS
- Felt vs Atlas.co
- Felt vs Global Mapper
- Felt vs GRASS GIS
- Felt vs onX Maps
- Felt vs Ride with GPS
- Felt vs SW Maps
- Felt vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Felt vs Kepler.gl
- Felt vs Trailforks
- Felt vs AllTrails
- Felt vs Bing Maps
- Felt vs Cesium ion
- Felt vs Citymapper
- Felt vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Felt vs ArcGIS Field Maps
