Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Matomo

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Matomo the self hosted Community Edition is free but excludes A/B testing, heatmaps, session recording, cohorts, crash analytics and multi channel attribution, all of which are paid plugins
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Matomo covers Web analytics.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Matomo actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Matomo
- Web analytics
- Real-time reports
- Custom dimensions
- Goal tracking
- E-commerce tracking
- Google Search Console
- Privacy-focused
- Cloud deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Matomo
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Matomo
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Matomo
Matomo
- Privacy focused web analytics as an alternative to Google Analyticsnot authentik
- Self hosting analytics so visitor data stays on owned infrastructurenot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Matomo
- The self hosted Community Edition is free but excludes A/B testing, heatmaps, session recording, cohorts, crash analytics and multi channel attribution, all of which are paid plugins
- Premium plugin bundles for self hosted installs run from 275 EUR a month for 4 users to 3,400 EUR for 50
- Cloud pricing is banded by monthly hits, and anything above 10 million requires contacting sales
- Self hosting places all operation and upgrades on the operator while still needing paid plugins for the advanced features
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Matomo
Free- Self-hostedFree
- Open-source
- Full analytics
- Privacy-focused
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Matomo if
- You need web analytics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, On-premise.
- You also want real-time reports.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Matomo better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Matomo at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Matomo?
- authentik starts at Free and Matomo at Free.
- Does authentik or Matomo run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Matomo runs on Web, On-premise.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Matomo is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Matomo cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Matomo covers Web analytics, Real-time reports, Custom dimensions, Goal tracking.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Matomo: How much does Matomo cost?
Matomo Cloud starts at EUR 29 per month for the Starter plan, which covers 50,000 hits per month. Matomo On-Premise has a free Community edition, with paid bundles from EUR 275 per month for up to 5M hits and 4 users.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Matomo: Is Matomo free?
The On-Premise Community edition is free forever with unlimited users and hits, supported through the forum only. Matomo Cloud is a paid service, though a free trial with access to all core features is offered.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Matomo: What is the difference between Matomo Cloud and On-Premise?
Cloud plans include hosting, maintenance, automatic updates and daily backups, priced by monthly hits from EUR 29. On-Premise is self-hosted, free in its Community edition, with paid bundles adding support and higher user counts.
SourceMatomo: How many hits do the Matomo On-Premise bundles cover?
The Team bundle covers up to 5M hits per month and 4 users at EUR 275 per month. Business covers up to 30M hits and 20 users at EUR 1,450. Enterprise covers up to 100M hits and 50 users at EUR 3,400.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs Umami
- authentik vs Crazy Egg
- authentik vs Ruler Analytics
- authentik vs VWO
- authentik vs Northbeam
- authentik vs Countly
- authentik vs Fathom Analytics
- authentik vs Mautic
- authentik vs Attribution
- authentik vs Plausible
- authentik vs Freshpaint
- authentik vs Simple Analytics
- authentik vs Mailgun
- authentik vs Triple Whale
- authentik vs Adobe Analytics
- authentik vs Adverity
- authentik vs Bloomreach
- authentik vs CallRail
- Matomo vs Authelia
- Matomo vs Logto
- Matomo vs Ory
- Matomo vs Passbolt
- Matomo vs Clerk
- Matomo vs 1Password
- Matomo vs Frontegg
- Matomo vs OWASP ZAP
- Matomo vs Infisical
- Matomo vs Chainguard
- Matomo vs Bitwarden
- Matomo vs Cosign
- Matomo vs CyberGhost VPN
- Matomo vs Dahua Technology
- Matomo vs Descope
- Matomo vs Drata
- Matomo vs DTiQ
- Matomo vs Ory Kratos
- Matomo vs Umami
- Matomo vs Crazy Egg
- Matomo vs Ruler Analytics
- Matomo vs VWO
- Matomo vs Northbeam
- Matomo vs Countly
- Matomo vs Fathom Analytics
- Matomo vs Mautic
- Matomo vs Attribution
- Matomo vs Plausible
- Matomo vs Freshpaint
- Matomo vs Simple Analytics
- Matomo vs Mailgun
- Matomo vs Triple Whale
- Matomo vs Adobe Analytics
- Matomo vs Adverity
- Matomo vs Bloomreach
- Matomo vs CallRail

