Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Ory Kratos

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Ory Kratos headless means you build every screen, which is significant work compared with a hosted login page
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Ory Kratos covers Headless API.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Ory Kratos actually diverge.
| Attribute | authentik | Ory Kratos |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open-source core with a paid enterprise tier | Open-source self-hosted, with a paid managed network |
| Platforms | Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Ory Kratos
- Headless API
- Self-service flows
- Multi-factor authentication
- Pluggable identity schemas
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Ory Kratos
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Ory Kratos
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Ory Kratos
Ory Kratos
- Products needing complete control over the look and flow of authenticationnot authentik
- Applications that must not hand user identity data to a third partynot authentik
- Teams building identity as infrastructure across several servicesnot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Ory Kratos
- Headless means you build every screen, which is significant work compared with a hosted login page
- More moving parts than a monolithic IAM: Kratos handles identity, and OAuth2 needs Ory Hydra alongside
- Documentation assumes real familiarity with identity concepts and is not a gentle introduction
- Self-hosting identity carries the security and availability burden that hosted providers absorb
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Ory Kratos
Free- Self-hostedFree
- Full identity server
- All flows
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Ory Kratos if
- You need headless api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want self-service flows.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Ory Kratos better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Ory Kratos at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Ory Kratos?
- authentik starts at Free and Ory Kratos at Free.
- Does authentik or Ory Kratos run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Ory Kratos runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Ory Kratos is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Ory Kratos cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Ory Kratos covers Headless API, Self-service flows, Multi-factor authentication, Pluggable identity schemas.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Ory Kratos: Is Ory Kratos free?
Yes, open source and free to self-host. Ory Network is a paid managed service.
authentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Ory Kratos: What does headless mean here?
Kratos provides identity flows as APIs and no user interface. You build the login, registration and recovery screens yourself.
authentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Ory Kratos: Does Kratos do OAuth2?
No. Kratos handles user identity; OAuth2 and OpenID Connect provider functionality is Ory Hydra, a separate component.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Trivy
- authentik vs LastPass
- authentik vs HashiCorp Vault
- authentik vs Semgrep
- authentik vs Envysion
- authentik vs Feedzai
- authentik vs HashiCorp Boundary
- authentik vs JumpCloud
- Ory Kratos vs Authelia
- Ory Kratos vs Logto
- Ory Kratos vs Ory
- Ory Kratos vs Passbolt
- Ory Kratos vs Clerk
- Ory Kratos vs 1Password
- Ory Kratos vs Frontegg
- Ory Kratos vs OWASP ZAP
- Ory Kratos vs Infisical
- Ory Kratos vs Chainguard
- Ory Kratos vs Bitwarden
- Ory Kratos vs Cosign
- Ory Kratos vs CyberGhost VPN
- Ory Kratos vs Dahua Technology
- Ory Kratos vs Descope
- Ory Kratos vs Drata
- Ory Kratos vs DTiQ
- Ory Kratos vs Trivy
- Ory Kratos vs LastPass
- Ory Kratos vs HashiCorp Vault
- Ory Kratos vs Semgrep
- Ory Kratos vs Envysion
- Ory Kratos vs Feedzai
- Ory Kratos vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Ory Kratos vs JumpCloud

