Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Infisical

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Infisical
Cybersecurity
Security infrastructure for developers and AI agents
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Infisical free tier limited to 5 identities, suitable only for small teams or evaluation
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Infisical covers Secrets management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Infisical actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Infisical
- Secrets management
- Certificate management
- Privileged access management
- Secret versioning
- Dynamic secrets
- SAML SSO
- Open-source core
- Secrets scanning
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Infisical
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Infisical
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Infisical
Infisical
- Managing secrets across Kubernetes clustersnot authentik
- Automating certificate lifecycle for internal PKInot authentik
- Providing privileged database access with audit trailsnot authentik
- Securing credentials for AI agents at runtimenot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Infisical
- Free tier limited to 5 identities, suitable only for small teams or evaluation
- Pricing tiers are per-identity, which scales costs with team size
- Certificate management requires Enterprise plan for advanced features like wildcards
- Privileged access tier is separate billing from secrets management
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Infisical
Free- FreeFree
- 5 identities
- Unlimited projects
- 3 environments
- Pro - Secrets$20/month
- Per-identity pricing
- Unlimited identities
- SAML SSO
- Pro - Secrets (Annual)$20/year
- Annual discount available
- Unlimited identities
- SAML SSO
- Advanced - Secrets$40/month
- Per-identity pricing
- Dynamic secrets
- Gateways
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Infisical if
- You need secrets management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI, Cloud, Self-Hosted.
- You also want certificate management.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Infisical better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Infisical at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Infisical?
- authentik starts at Free and Infisical at Free.
- Does authentik or Infisical run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Infisical runs on Web, CLI, Cloud, Self-Hosted.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Infisical is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Infisical cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Infisical covers Secrets management, Certificate management, Privileged access management, Secret versioning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Infisical: How is pricing calculated for Secrets Management?
Pricing is per-identity per month. Free tier includes 5 identities. Pro tier is $20/identity/month, Advanced is $40/identity/month. All pricing in USD.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Infisical: Can I self-host Infisical?
Yes, Infisical's core is open-source under the MIT license and can be self-hosted. The managed cloud service is also available with additional features.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Infisical: What is included in the Enterprise plan?
Enterprise plan includes SCIM, LDAP, approval workflows, external KMS/HSM support, and 99.99% SLA. Pricing is custom and determined by annual commitment.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs Akeyless
- authentik vs Doppler
- authentik vs HashiCorp Vault
- authentik vs Delinea
- authentik vs Semgrep
- authentik vs Trivy
- authentik vs Grype
- authentik vs Legit Security
- authentik vs LogRhythm SIEM
- authentik vs Metasploit
- authentik vs MetricStream
- authentik vs Microsoft Defender
- authentik vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Infisical vs Authelia
- Infisical vs Logto
- Infisical vs Ory
- Infisical vs Passbolt
- Infisical vs Clerk
- Infisical vs 1Password
- Infisical vs Frontegg
- Infisical vs OWASP ZAP
- Infisical vs Chainguard
- Infisical vs Bitwarden
- Infisical vs Cosign
- Infisical vs CyberGhost VPN
- Infisical vs Dahua Technology
- Infisical vs Descope
- Infisical vs Drata
- Infisical vs DTiQ
- Infisical vs Ory Kratos
- Infisical vs Akeyless
- Infisical vs Doppler
- Infisical vs HashiCorp Vault
- Infisical vs Delinea
- Infisical vs Semgrep
- Infisical vs Trivy
- Infisical vs Grype
- Infisical vs Legit Security
- Infisical vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Infisical vs Metasploit
- Infisical vs MetricStream
- Infisical vs Microsoft Defender
- Infisical vs Microsoft Sentinel
