Softwr

Cybersecurity · alternatives

Alternatives to authentik

21 cybersecurity tools sit alongside authentik in this directory. Below is what separates each from authentik on the figures we hold, price, model, tier count and rating, and a direct comparison for every one.

Alternatives listed
21
With a free tier
16
Cheaper to start
-
authentik starts at
Free

Why people look past authentik

Only what the record supports. Each point below is a figure on the authentik entry measured against the tools listed beside it.

There is only one tier

authentik publishes a single plan, Open source at Free. There is no smaller tier to drop to if the fit is wrong or the budget moves.

What each alternative does differently

Ordered by the aggregated rating on each catalogue entry. Differences are drawn from price, pricing model, tier count and rating, the fields the category listing carries. For a feature-level difference, follow the head-to-head link on each card: those pages read both full records.

Open-source identity and access management server.

  • Publishes an entry price of Free, where authentik does not.
  • Sold on a open-source model rather than Open-source core with a paid enterprise tier.
Free, then $6/user/month (annual minimum $1,500)

The identity platform for builders

  • Publishes an entry price of $6/user/month (annual minimum $1,500), where authentik does not.
  • 5 tiers to authentik's 1.

Open-source authentication and two-factor portal for reverse proxies

  • Sold on a Open source, no licence fee model rather than Open-source core with a paid enterprise tier.
Free

Vulnerability scanner for container images and filesystems

  • Sold on a Open source, no licence fee model rather than Open-source core with a paid enterprise tier.

Headless identity and user management API

  • Sold on a Open-source self-hosted, with a paid managed network model rather than Open-source core with a paid enterprise tier.
Free

Open-source vulnerability and misconfiguration scanner

  • Sold on a Open source, no licence fee model rather than Open-source core with a paid enterprise tier.

Every authentik alternative at a glance

A dash means the catalogue entry carries no figure, not that the answer is nothing.

Cybersecurity alternatives to authentik
ToolEntry priceModelTiersHead to head
authentik (this page)FreeOpen-source core with a paid enterprise tier1
KeycloakThe larger, more established open-source identity provider, heavier to runFreeOpen-source1vs authentik
OktaThe managed option, removing operations entirely in exchange for per-user pricingFree, then $6/user/month (annual minimum $1,500)-5vs authentik
AutheliaFreeOpen source, no licence fee1vs authentik
GrypeFreeOpen source, no licence fee1vs authentik
Ory KratosFreeOpen-source self-hosted, with a paid managed network1vs authentik
TrivyFreeOpen source, no licence fee1vs authentik
AikidoFreeSubscription with free tier4vs authentik
SocketFree, then $25/monthPer-developer monthly subscription with tiered access4vs authentik
ChainguardFree, then $19000/yearLicensing by artifact type and team size7vs authentik
Endor LabsFreeSeat-based per contributing developer with volume discounts1vs authentik
DopplerFree, then $21/month-3vs authentik
ArnicaFree, then $300/yearPer-identity subscription with annual discount3vs authentik
InfisicalFree, then $20/month-5vs authentik
AkeylessFreeUsage-based pricing units that vary by product module2vs authentik
WindscribeFree, then $3/monthFreemium3vs authentik
TunnelBearFree, then $9.99/monthFreemium3vs authentik
Tenable$3500/yearSubscription5vs authentik
SysdigOn requestCustom pricing based on number of hosts, events processed, or time series data-vs authentik
Legit SecurityOn requestContact sales for custom pricing-vs authentik
TaniumOn requestQuote1vs authentik
VeracodeOn requestQuote-vs authentik

Ratings are aggregated from third-party sources and imported with each catalogue entry; Softwr hosts no reviews of these products. How each figure is used is set out on the authentik badges page.

Cheaper ways to solve the same problem

Free to start (16)

These publish a tier that costs nothing, so they can be evaluated before any money changes hands.

What you would be giving up

authentik is most often brought in for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Anything replacing it has to cover the ones you actually depend on, and a cheaper tool that misses one of them is not cheaper.

Two things this page cannot settle. It compares on price, model, tier count and rating, because those are the fields the category listing carries, feature-level differences need both full records, which is what the head-to-head pages load. And the ratings are third-party aggregates imported with each entry rather than reviews written here, so a 0.2 difference between two tools is noise rather than a finding.

If authentik is broadly right and the question is cost, the authentik pricing breakdown covers every tier and what each one adds. If you want the whole field rather than a shortlist, the Cybersecurity category lists everything the directory holds, and best cybersecurity tools ranks them.

authentik runs on docker, kubernetes, linux, self-hosted. Platform coverage is not carried on the category listing for the alternatives, so it is one more thing to check on each head-to-head page rather than here.

Questions about authentik alternatives

What are the main alternatives to authentik?
21 other cybersecurity tools are listed in this directory, led by Keycloak, Okta, Authelia, Grype. They are ordered by the aggregated rating on each catalogue entry, not by any Softwr ranking.
What is the best free alternative to authentik?
16 of the alternatives listed here can be used without paying: Keycloak, Okta, Authelia, Grype, Ory Kratos.
Why do people look for an alternative to authentik?
On the figures on record, one thing stands out: there is only one tier. Each is set out with the numbers behind it above.
What would I give up by switching from authentik?
authentik is most often brought in for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Anything you replace it with has to cover the ones you actually rely on, the side-by-side comparisons linked from each alternative below put the two feature records against each other.
Is there an open-source alternative to authentik?
Keycloak is recorded with an open-source licence model.
How were these authentik alternatives chosen?
They are the tools filed in the same category, Cybersecurity, ordered by the aggregated rating on each entry. There is no editorial shortlist, and nothing on this page is paid: no sponsored placement runs on alternatives pages and the order cannot be bought. Softwr has not used these products.
Where can I compare authentik against one of these directly?
Every alternative below has a side-by-side page against authentik covering price, platforms, features and what each one is used for. Those pages read the full record for both products rather than the summary shown here.
Does this list cover every cybersecurity tool?
No. It covers what this directory holds in the Cybersecurity category, 21 tools beside authentik. The category page lists the rest of the catalogue as it grows.

Related pages