Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs CyberGhost VPN

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
CyberGhost VPN
Cybersecurity
Consumer VPN operated from Romania and owned by Kape Technologies, with a no-logs claim audited by Deloitte.
- From
- $2.19/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only authentik has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; CyberGhost VPN kape Technologies, the parent, was formerly Crossrider, a browser extension platform whose technology was widely used to distribute adware, and Kape now also owns VPN review sites, so third-party rankings a buyer might use to verify the product can come from the same corporate group.
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, CyberGhost VPN covers NoSpy servers.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and CyberGhost VPN actually diverge.
| Attribute | authentik | CyberGhost VPN |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $2.19/month |
| Pricing model | Open-source core with a paid enterprise tier | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted | Web, Desktop, Mobile |
| Founded | Unknown | 2011 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in CyberGhost VPN
- NoSpy servers
- Audited no-logs policy
- WireGuard, OpenVPN and IKEv2
- Streaming-labelled servers
- Dedicated IP via token
- Kill switch
- Split tunnelling
- Smart Rules
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot CyberGhost VPN
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot CyberGhost VPN
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot CyberGhost VPN
CyberGhost VPN
- A household that wants one subscription covering several devices for streaming and public Wi-Finot authentik
- A buyer who specifically wants a provider outside the Fourteen Eyes with a published third-party no-logs auditnot authentik
- Torrenting on a connection where the internet provider throttles or logs peer-to-peer trafficnot authentik
- Travellers needing to reach home-country services from abroad without configuring anything technicalnot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
CyberGhost VPN
- Kape Technologies, the parent, was formerly Crossrider, a browser extension platform whose technology was widely used to distribute adware, and Kape now also owns VPN review sites, so third-party rankings a buyer might use to verify the product can come from the same corporate group.
- Pricing is structured so that the deep discount applies to the longest initial term and the standard rate applies at renewal, which means the figure used to make the decision is not the figure paid in year three unless the subscriber renegotiates or churns.
- The Deloitte engagement is point-in-time assurance over stated policy and server configuration, so it confirms things were as described when examined and says nothing about how the infrastructure behaves today or after an ownership change.
- Client capability differs sharply by platform: the Linux client is command-line only and lacks the kill switch and split tunnelling that the Windows client has, so a mixed-device household does not get the protection that reviews of the Windows app describe.
- Streaming-optimised server labels go stale because platforms block address ranges continually, and the practical support answer is to try a different server, which makes the labelled-server feature less dependable than the marketing implies.
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
CyberGhost VPN
$2.19/month- 1 Month$12.99/month
- 7 devices
- 9000+ servers
- Unlimited bandwidth
- 2 Years + 2 Months$2.19/month
- All features
- Best value
- 45-day guarantee
- 6 Months$6.99/month
- All features
- 45-day guarantee
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose CyberGhost VPN if
- You need nospy servers.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Mobile.
- You also want audited no-logs policy.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or CyberGhost VPN better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and CyberGhost VPN at $2.19/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or CyberGhost VPN?
- authentik has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for authentik and $2.19/month for CyberGhost VPN.
- Does authentik or CyberGhost VPN run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. CyberGhost VPN runs on Web, Desktop, Mobile.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Yes. authentik has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. CyberGhost VPN starts at $2.19/month.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what CyberGhost VPN is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that CyberGhost VPN cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. CyberGhost VPN covers NoSpy servers, Audited no-logs policy, WireGuard, OpenVPN and IKEv2, Streaming-labelled servers.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
CyberGhost VPN: Who owns CyberGhost?
Kape Technologies, which acquired it in 2017. Kape was formerly called Crossrider and also owns ExpressVPN, Private Internet Access and Zenmate, plus the review sites vpnMentor and Wizcase.
authentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
CyberGhost VPN: Has the no-logs claim been independently audited?
Yes. Deloitte has examined the no-logs policy and server configuration and published an assurance report. Note that this is a point-in-time engagement, not continuous monitoring.
authentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
CyberGhost VPN: What jurisdiction is it under?
The service is operated from Romania, which has no mandatory communications data retention law in force and is not a member of the Five, Nine or Fourteen Eyes intelligence-sharing arrangements. Ownership sits with Kape, headquartered in the UK.
CyberGhost VPN: Does it work with streaming services?
Often, using the servers labelled for each service, but this changes constantly as platforms block address ranges. Treat streaming access as a feature that may stop working on any given day rather than a guarantee.
CyberGhost VPN: Can I use it on Linux or a router?
There is a command-line Linux client with fewer features than the desktop apps, and router use requires manual OpenVPN configuration rather than an official app.
Related pages
More on CyberGhost VPN
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs Surfshark
- authentik vs Norton 360
- authentik vs Bitdefender Total Security
- authentik vs LastPass
- authentik vs NordVPN
- authentik vs Private Internet Access
- authentik vs TunnelBear
- authentik vs Mullvad VPN
- authentik vs Windscribe
- authentik vs Avast One
- authentik vs IVPN
- authentik vs Sigstore
- authentik vs Speakeasy
- authentik vs Sysdig
- authentik vs Tenable
- authentik vs Trend Micro Vision One
- CyberGhost VPN vs Authelia
- CyberGhost VPN vs Logto
- CyberGhost VPN vs Ory
- CyberGhost VPN vs Passbolt
- CyberGhost VPN vs Clerk
- CyberGhost VPN vs 1Password
- CyberGhost VPN vs Frontegg
- CyberGhost VPN vs OWASP ZAP
- CyberGhost VPN vs Infisical
- CyberGhost VPN vs Chainguard
- CyberGhost VPN vs Bitwarden
- CyberGhost VPN vs Cosign
- CyberGhost VPN vs Dahua Technology
- CyberGhost VPN vs Descope
- CyberGhost VPN vs Drata
- CyberGhost VPN vs DTiQ
- CyberGhost VPN vs Ory Kratos
- CyberGhost VPN vs Surfshark
- CyberGhost VPN vs Norton 360
- CyberGhost VPN vs Bitdefender Total Security
- CyberGhost VPN vs LastPass
- CyberGhost VPN vs NordVPN
- CyberGhost VPN vs Private Internet Access
- CyberGhost VPN vs TunnelBear
- CyberGhost VPN vs Mullvad VPN
- CyberGhost VPN vs Windscribe
- CyberGhost VPN vs Avast One
- CyberGhost VPN vs IVPN
- CyberGhost VPN vs Sigstore
- CyberGhost VPN vs Speakeasy
- CyberGhost VPN vs Sysdig
- CyberGhost VPN vs Tenable
- CyberGhost VPN vs Trend Micro Vision One
