Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Countly

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Countly the private cloud plan starts at $175 a month and is described as usage based without stating the unit
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Countly covers Event tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Countly actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Countly
- Event tracking
- Crash reporting
- Analytics dashboard
- User retention
- Open-source
- Cloud deployment
- On-premise deployment
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Countly
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Countly
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Countly
Countly
- Product analytics for mobile and web applicationsnot authentik
- Self hosting analytics where data cannot leave the organisationnot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Countly
- The private cloud plan starts at $175 a month and is described as usage based without stating the unit
- No event cap, data point limit or user limit is published for either paid plan
- The self hosted Enterprise edition is custom priced and billed annually
- Adaptivity and intelligence features are separately priced add ons on the cheaper plan
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Countly
Free- Flex (Private Cloud)$175/month
- Usage-based pricing (not seat-based)
- Advanced Analytics included
- Adaptivity and Intelligence available as add-ons
- Enterprise (Self-Hosted)$null/mo
- Custom pricing, requires demo booking
- All capabilities included
- Deploy on your infrastructure
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Countly if
- You need event tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Mobile, Api.
- You also want crash reporting.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Countly better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Countly at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Countly?
- authentik starts at Free and Countly at Free.
- Does authentik or Countly run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Countly runs on Web, Mobile, Api.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Countly is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Countly cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Countly covers Event tracking, Crash reporting, Analytics dashboard, User retention.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Countly: How much does Countly cost?
Countly's Flex plan (private cloud) starts at $175/month with pay-as-you-go cancellation. Enterprise (self-hosted) requires custom pricing and annual billing. Both plans include advanced analytics, and Flex offers a 14-day free trial.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Countly: What is the difference between Countly Flex and Enterprise plans?
Flex uses usage-based pricing on Countly's cloud with monthly billing. Enterprise requires custom pricing and annual billing, but allows self-hosting on your infrastructure with zero vendor access to data, dedicated support, and included SLA.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Countly: Can I add Adaptivity and Intelligence to Countly Flex?
Yes, Adaptivity and Intelligence suites can be added to Flex as needed. Both are included standard with Enterprise plans.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs Crazy Egg
- authentik vs Ruler Analytics
- authentik vs VWO
- authentik vs Northbeam
- authentik vs Umami
- authentik vs Matomo
- authentik vs Mautic
- authentik vs June
- authentik vs CleverTap
- authentik vs Moz
- authentik vs Microsoft Clarity
- authentik vs Netcore Cloud
- authentik vs Whatagraph
- authentik vs MoEngage
- authentik vs Optimizely
- authentik vs Vimeo
- authentik vs Attribution
- authentik vs Fathom Analytics
- Countly vs Authelia
- Countly vs Logto
- Countly vs Ory
- Countly vs Passbolt
- Countly vs Clerk
- Countly vs 1Password
- Countly vs Frontegg
- Countly vs OWASP ZAP
- Countly vs Infisical
- Countly vs Chainguard
- Countly vs Bitwarden
- Countly vs Cosign
- Countly vs CyberGhost VPN
- Countly vs Dahua Technology
- Countly vs Descope
- Countly vs Drata
- Countly vs DTiQ
- Countly vs Ory Kratos
- Countly vs Crazy Egg
- Countly vs Ruler Analytics
- Countly vs VWO
- Countly vs Northbeam
- Countly vs Umami
- Countly vs Matomo
- Countly vs Mautic
- Countly vs June
- Countly vs CleverTap
- Countly vs Moz
- Countly vs Microsoft Clarity
- Countly vs Netcore Cloud
- Countly vs Whatagraph
- Countly vs MoEngage
- Countly vs Optimizely
- Countly vs Vimeo
- Countly vs Attribution
- Countly vs Fathom Analytics

