Field Service · head to head
Tractian vs Zuper

Tractian
Field Service
CMMS with published per-user pricing plus vibration sensors sold as a separate per-asset subscription
- From
- $60/month
- Rated
- -

Zuper
Field Service
Field service management with an API-first architecture and heavy integration surface
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Tractian sensors are excluded from both published CMMS tiers and are quoted per monitored asset, so the transparent rate card covers only the part of the deployment that costs least.; Zuper zuper publishes no pricing at all, and third-party reports span 50 to 150 US dollars per user per month, so you cannot even estimate a budget without a sales conversation.
- They diverge on capability: Tractian covers Published per-user pricing, Zuper covers Work order management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Tractian and Zuper actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Field Service).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Tractian
- Published per-user pricing
- Unlimited requesters
- Smart Trac sensors
- Automatic work order creation
- Mobile execution
- Preventive maintenance planning
- Power BI connector
- ERP integration
Only in Zuper
- Work order management
- Intelligent dispatch
- Technician mobile
- Inventory
- Job costing
- Open API and webhooks
- AI agents
- Customer portal
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Tractian
- A mid-market plant replacing spreadsheet maintenance planning where hundreds of operators must report faults but only a dozen plan worknot Zuper
- Instrumenting critical motors and pumps and having detected faults become work orders without an integration projectnot Zuper
- A maintenance manager who needs a defensible budget figure before an approval meeting rather than a quote in three weeksnot Zuper
- A multi-site manufacturer wanting the same CMMS and sensor platform across Brazilian, Mexican and United States plantsnot Zuper
Zuper
- A service business whose customer records already live in Salesforce or HubSpot wants field execution underneath rather than a platform that insists on owning the customer.not Tractian
- A solar or utility contractor needs work orders driven by an external asset or billing system through an API rather than entered by a dispatcher.not Tractian
- A multi-location or franchise operation needs consistent job workflows and reporting across sites with an existing enterprise finance system to feed.not Tractian
- A support organisation already running Zendesk or Freshdesk wants field visits raised from tickets and closed back into them without a middleware project.not Tractian
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Tractian
- Sensors are excluded from both published CMMS tiers and are quoted per monitored asset, so the transparent rate card covers only the part of the deployment that costs least.
- Smart Trac hardware reports into the Tractian platform, so a plant that later changes analytics vendor writes off the installed sensor base.
- The five-user minimum on Standard and ten-user minimum on Enterprise put a floor under the cost that small maintenance teams cannot get below.
- ERP integration, single sign-on and the Power BI connector are Enterprise-only, so an organisation needing SAP integration pays the higher rate for every licensed user including technicians who need none of it.
- The company is young and venture-funded with rapid product expansion, so enterprise features are newer than the core CMMS and reference sites at large industrial scale are fewer than for established EAM vendors.
Zuper
- Zuper publishes no pricing at all, and third-party reports span 50 to 150 US dollars per user per month, so you cannot even estimate a budget without a sales conversation.
- At the reported rates it costs several times a Jobber or Housecall Pro seat, which makes it hard to justify for a small contractor who will use a fraction of the configuration surface.
- The flexibility that makes it a good execution layer means it needs configuring: custom statuses, forms and workflow rules are strengths for a business with an operations analyst and a burden for one without.
- Accounting is integration-only and the finance depth is thin next to platforms with native ledgers, so complex tax, multi-entity or progress billing scenarios push work back into the ERP.
- It is a younger and smaller vendor than ServiceTitan or FieldEdge with a correspondingly thinner partner and implementation network, so if you need local implementation help outside the main markets you may be dealing directly with the vendor or doing it yourself.
Pricing, plan by plan
Tractian
$60/month- Standard$60/month
- From 60 USD per user per month, billed annually
- Minimum five users
- Unlimited assets and unlimited requester accounts
- Enterprise$100/month
- From 100 USD per user per month, billed annually
- Minimum ten users
- Single sign-on and custom entities
- Bundle$undefined/year
- CMMS combined with condition monitoring sensors
- Priced per monitored asset, quoted rather than published
- Includes failure detection, root cause analysis and reliability support
Zuper
On request- Starter$undefined/month
- Core work orders, scheduling and mobile app
- Standard integrations
- Priced per user on application
- Growth$undefined/month
- Adds inventory, job costing and advanced workflows
- Quoted on application
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Custom workflows, API access at scale and dedicated support
- Quoted on application, typically with an annual commitment
Which should you pick?
Choose Tractian if
- You need published per-user pricing.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want unlimited requesters.
Choose Zuper if
- You need work order management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want intelligent dispatch.
Questions people ask
- Is Tractian or Zuper better?
- Neither clearly leads. Tractian starts at $60/month and Zuper at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Tractian or Zuper?
- Tractian starts at $60/month and Zuper at On request.
- Does Tractian or Zuper run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Tractian best used for?
- Tractian is most often used for a mid-market plant replacing spreadsheet maintenance planning where hundreds of operators must report faults but only a dozen plan work, instrumenting critical motors and pumps and having detected faults become work orders without an integration project, a maintenance manager who needs a defensible budget figure before an approval meeting rather than a quote in three weeks, a multi-site manufacturer wanting the same cmms and sensor platform across brazilian, mexican and united states plants. Of those, a mid-market plant replacing spreadsheet maintenance planning where hundreds of operators must report faults but only a dozen plan work and instrumenting critical motors and pumps and having detected faults become work orders without an integration project are not what Zuper is typically brought in for.
- What can Tractian do that Zuper cannot?
- Tractian covers Published per-user pricing, Unlimited requesters, Smart Trac sensors, Automatic work order creation. Zuper covers Work order management, Intelligent dispatch, Technician mobile, Inventory.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Tractian: What does the CMMS actually cost?
Standard is from 60 USD per user per month with five users minimum, Enterprise from 100 USD with ten minimum, both billed annually.
Zuper: How much does Zuper cost?
It is not published. Independent reports put it roughly between 50 and 150 US dollars per user per month depending on tier and volume, usually on an annual commitment.
Tractian: Are the sensors included?
No. Both CMMS tiers explicitly exclude sensors, which are priced per monitored asset under a separate bundle that is not published.
Zuper: Can Zuper run under Salesforce or HubSpot?
Yes, that is one of its main positions. It integrates as a field execution layer rather than requiring you to move the customer record.
Tractian: Do fault reporters need licences?
No. Requester accounts are unlimited on both tiers, which is the main reason the per-user price is workable for large plants.
Zuper: Does it work offline?
The technician mobile app is built to capture work offline and sync when connectivity returns.
Tractian: Can I use the sensors with another platform?
No. Smart Trac hardware reports to the Tractian platform.
Zuper: Is Zuper suitable for a five person contractor?
Usually not on cost. At the reported per-seat rates, Jobber or Housecall Pro deliver the same day-to-day job flow far cheaper.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Tractian vs FaciliWorks
- Tractian vs IFS Ultimo EAM
- Tractian vs Fracttal One
- Tractian vs MaintainX
- Tractian vs Redlist
- Tractian vs Joblogic
- Tractian vs Brightly Asset Essentials
- Tractian vs Commusoft
- Tractian vs Properly
- Tractian vs BigChange
- Tractian vs Repsly
- Tractian vs Jobber
- Tractian vs Tradify
- Tractian vs Vonigo
- Tractian vs Workiz
- Tractian vs FieldEdge
- Tractian vs Housecall Pro
- Tractian vs ServiceTitan
- Tractian vs Synchroteam
- Tractian vs Skedulo
- Tractian vs ResortCleaning
- Zuper vs FaciliWorks
- Zuper vs IFS Ultimo EAM
- Zuper vs Fracttal One
- Zuper vs MaintainX
- Zuper vs Redlist
- Zuper vs Joblogic
- Zuper vs Brightly Asset Essentials
- Zuper vs Commusoft
- Zuper vs Properly
- Zuper vs BigChange
- Zuper vs Repsly
- Zuper vs Jobber
- Zuper vs Tradify
- Zuper vs Vonigo
- Zuper vs Workiz
- Zuper vs FieldEdge
- Zuper vs Housecall Pro
- Zuper vs ServiceTitan
- Zuper vs Synchroteam
- Zuper vs Skedulo
- Zuper vs ResortCleaning
