Softwr

Field Service · head to head

FieldEdge vs Zuper

FieldEdge logo

FieldEdge

Field Service

Service management for HVAC, plumbing and electrical contractors with deep QuickBooks Desktop sync

From
On request
Rated
-
Zuper logo

Zuper

Field Service

Field service management with an API-first architecture and heavy integration surface

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: FieldEdge there is no published rate card whatsoever, and reported figures cluster around 100 US dollars per office user and 125 per technician per month, so a ten-person shop is looking at well over a thousand dollars a month before add-ons.; Zuper zuper publishes no pricing at all, and third-party reports span 50 to 150 US dollars per user per month, so you cannot even estimate a budget without a sales conversation.
  • They diverge on capability: FieldEdge covers Dispatch board, Zuper covers Work order management.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which FieldEdge and Zuper actually diverge.

Attributes where FieldEdge and Zuper differ
AttributeFieldEdgeZuper
PlatformsWeb, iOS, Android, WindowsWeb, iOS, Android

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Field Service).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in FieldEdge

  • Dispatch board
  • QuickBooks Desktop sync
  • Flat-rate pricebook
  • Service agreements
  • Customer history
  • Xplor Pay

Only in Zuper

  • Work order management
  • Intelligent dispatch
  • Job costing
  • Open API and webhooks
  • AI agents
  • Customer portal

Both cover

  • Technician mobile
  • Inventory

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

FieldEdge

  • An HVAC contractor with a decade of history in a QuickBooks Desktop company file needs field service software that syncs to it live rather than forcing a migration to QuickBooks Online.not Zuper
  • A plumbing business selling annual maintenance contracts wants renewals, visit scheduling and revenue tracked automatically instead of on a spreadsheet the office manager owns.not Zuper
  • A contractor wants technicians presenting good, better, best flat-rate options at the kitchen table to lift average ticket, using a maintained pricebook rather than one built in house.not Zuper
  • A firm of thirty staff has outgrown paper dispatch but does not want a ServiceTitan implementation costing tens of thousands and taking months.not Zuper

Zuper

  • A service business whose customer records already live in Salesforce or HubSpot wants field execution underneath rather than a platform that insists on owning the customer.not FieldEdge
  • A solar or utility contractor needs work orders driven by an external asset or billing system through an API rather than entered by a dispatcher.not FieldEdge
  • A multi-location or franchise operation needs consistent job workflows and reporting across sites with an existing enterprise finance system to feed.not FieldEdge
  • A support organisation already running Zendesk or Freshdesk wants field visits raised from tickets and closed back into them without a middleware project.not FieldEdge

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

FieldEdge

  • There is no published rate card whatsoever, and reported figures cluster around 100 US dollars per office user and 125 per technician per month, so a ten-person shop is looking at well over a thousand dollars a month before add-ons.
  • Implementation is chargeable, commonly reported between 500 and 2,000 US dollars depending on the training plan, which is a real cost small contractors do not budget for.
  • Ownership by Xplor Technologies, a payments group, means the commercial incentive is to move you onto Xplor Pay processing, and the total cost of ownership therefore depends heavily on merchant rates that are negotiated rather than published.
  • Features that competitors bundle are sold as add-ons, with advanced reporting, inventory management and additional technician mobile licences each reported as separate monthly line items that stack on top of the seat price.
  • The office application carries its dESCO heritage and feels dated next to newer platforms, and it is US-centric: tax handling, payments and the pricebook content assume a North American business, so it is a poor fit outside the United States and Canada.

Zuper

  • Zuper publishes no pricing at all, and third-party reports span 50 to 150 US dollars per user per month, so you cannot even estimate a budget without a sales conversation.
  • At the reported rates it costs several times a Jobber or Housecall Pro seat, which makes it hard to justify for a small contractor who will use a fraction of the configuration surface.
  • The flexibility that makes it a good execution layer means it needs configuring: custom statuses, forms and workflow rules are strengths for a business with an operations analyst and a burden for one without.
  • Accounting is integration-only and the finance depth is thin next to platforms with native ledgers, so complex tax, multi-entity or progress billing scenarios push work back into the ERP.
  • It is a younger and smaller vendor than ServiceTitan or FieldEdge with a correspondingly thinner partner and implementation network, so if you need local implementation help outside the main markets you may be dealing directly with the vendor or doing it yourself.

Pricing, plan by plan

FieldEdge

On request
  • Select$undefined/month
    • Core dispatch, work orders and mobile
    • QuickBooks sync
    • Priced separately per office user and per technician
  • Premier$undefined/month
    • Adds service agreements and flat-rate pricebook
    • Quoted on application
  • Elite$undefined/month
    • Adds advanced reporting and higher-tier modules
    • Quoted on application

Zuper

On request
  • Starter$undefined/month
    • Core work orders, scheduling and mobile app
    • Standard integrations
    • Priced per user on application
  • Growth$undefined/month
    • Adds inventory, job costing and advanced workflows
    • Quoted on application
  • Enterprise$undefined/month
    • Custom workflows, API access at scale and dedicated support
    • Quoted on application, typically with an annual commitment

Which should you pick?

Choose FieldEdge if

  • You need dispatch board.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows.
  • You also want quickbooks desktop sync.

Choose Zuper if

  • You need work order management.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want intelligent dispatch.

Questions people ask

Is FieldEdge or Zuper better?
Neither clearly leads. FieldEdge starts at On request and Zuper at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, FieldEdge or Zuper?
FieldEdge starts at On request and Zuper at On request.
Does FieldEdge or Zuper run on more platforms?
FieldEdge runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows. Zuper runs on Web, iOS, Android.
What is FieldEdge best used for?
FieldEdge is most often used for an hvac contractor with a decade of history in a quickbooks desktop company file needs field service software that syncs to it live rather than forcing a migration to quickbooks online., a plumbing business selling annual maintenance contracts wants renewals, visit scheduling and revenue tracked automatically instead of on a spreadsheet the office manager owns., a contractor wants technicians presenting good, better, best flat-rate options at the kitchen table to lift average ticket, using a maintained pricebook rather than one built in house., a firm of thirty staff has outgrown paper dispatch but does not want a servicetitan implementation costing tens of thousands and taking months.. Of those, an hvac contractor with a decade of history in a quickbooks desktop company file needs field service software that syncs to it live rather than forcing a migration to quickbooks online. and a plumbing business selling annual maintenance contracts wants renewals, visit scheduling and revenue tracked automatically instead of on a spreadsheet the office manager owns. are not what Zuper is typically brought in for.
What can FieldEdge do that Zuper cannot?
FieldEdge covers Dispatch board, QuickBooks Desktop sync, Flat-rate pricebook, Service agreements. Zuper covers Work order management, Intelligent dispatch, Job costing, Open API and webhooks. Both handle Technician mobile, Inventory.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

FieldEdge: Who owns FieldEdge?

Xplor Technologies, a payments and commerce group formed from Clearent and Transaction Services Group. FieldEdge sits in its Field Services division and keeps its own name and product.

Zuper: How much does Zuper cost?

It is not published. Independent reports put it roughly between 50 and 150 US dollars per user per month depending on tier and volume, usually on an annual commitment.

FieldEdge: Does FieldEdge work with QuickBooks Desktop?

Yes, with a live two-way sync. This is the main reason contractors pick it over competitors that support only QuickBooks Online.

Zuper: Can Zuper run under Salesforce or HubSpot?

Yes, that is one of its main positions. It integrates as a field execution layer rather than requiring you to move the customer record.

FieldEdge: What does FieldEdge cost?

It is quote-only. Contractors commonly report around 100 US dollars per office user and 125 per technician per month, plus a setup fee and per-module add-ons.

Zuper: Does it work offline?

The technician mobile app is built to capture work offline and sync when connectivity returns.

FieldEdge: Is it available outside the United States?

It is built for the US and Canadian home services market. Tax, payments and pricebook content assume North America.

Zuper: Is Zuper suitable for a five person contractor?

Usually not on cost. At the reported per-seat rates, Jobber or Housecall Pro deliver the same day-to-day job flow far cheaper.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads