Travel · head to head
Egencia vs Shiji

Egencia
Travel
Corporate online booking and travel management from Amex GBT for mid-market and enterprise programmes
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Shiji
Travel
Enterprise hospitality platform covering PMS, point of sale and payments, owned by a Chinese listed group
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Egencia pricing is per transaction and offline touches cost several times an online booking, so a programme with many complex multi-leg itineraries pays far more than the headline online fee suggests.; Shiji chinese ownership and a Shenzhen listing raise data residency and supply chain questions that must be settled during procurement, and in United States government or defence-adjacent accounts they can end the evaluation outright.
- They diverge on capability: Egencia covers Policy and approval engine, Shiji covers Daylight PMS.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Egencia and Shiji actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Travel).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Egencia
- Policy and approval engine
- Negotiated rate loading
- Traveller tracking
- Agent support
- Concur Expense integration
- AI booking assistant
Only in Shiji
- Daylight PMS
- Infrasys POS
- Payments
- Distribution
- Guest engagement
- Open API access
- Regional data centres
- Multi-language and multi-currency
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Egencia
- A company of several hundred travellers wanting negotiated hotel rates without paying for a high-touch TMCnot Shiji
- A finance team standardising on SAP Concur that wants booking data pre-populating expense reportsnot Shiji
- A multi-country employer needing consolidated duty of care reporting on where staff are travellingnot Shiji
- An organisation moving off a regional TMC and wanting one supplier across Europe and North Americanot Shiji
Shiji
- An international luxury group replacing Opera across dozens of properties without moving to a small cloud vendornot Egencia
- A resort with a dozen restaurants and bars needing one point of sale across all outletsnot Egencia
- An Asia Pacific group requiring native multi-currency, multi-language operation across marketsnot Egencia
- A hotel company consolidating PMS, POS and payment onto a single vendor contractnot Egencia
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Egencia
- Pricing is per transaction and offline touches cost several times an online booking, so a programme with many complex multi-leg itineraries pays far more than the headline online fee suggests.
- It is now a service tier inside Amex GBT rather than an independent supplier, so a competitive process that shortlists both Egencia and Amex GBT is not really two bids.
- Regional content and service quality are uneven, and companies with travellers in smaller markets often find local fares and hotels missing from the tool and end up going offline.
- Implementation to load negotiated rates and configure policy typically runs months, and rate loading errors surface as travellers seeing the wrong prices rather than as a clean failure.
- Because the platform underwent a relaunch on new architecture, customers migrating from the older Egencia stack have faced feature parity gaps and retraining during the transition.
Shiji
- Chinese ownership and a Shenzhen listing raise data residency and supply chain questions that must be settled during procurement, and in United States government or defence-adjacent accounts they can end the evaluation outright.
- Pricing is entirely quoted with no published figures at any product level, so comparing Shiji against Oracle or Mews on cost requires a full sales engagement.
- The portfolio is partly assembled from acquisitions, and the degree of integration between products varies, so a group buying several Shiji modules should test the joins rather than assume them.
- Implementation timelines at enterprise scale run to many months and require interface development that is charged on top of licence, which is a substantial hidden budget line.
- It is not a realistic option below roughly the mid-scale group level; a single independent hotel will not get sensible pricing or attention.
Pricing, plan by plan
Egencia
On request- Egencia$undefined/year
- Per-transaction booking fees, online and offline rates differ
- Optional annual platform or management fee
- Implementation and rate loading charges
Shiji
On request- Shiji Enterprise Platform$undefined/year
- Quoted per property and per portfolio
- PMS, POS and payments priced as separate lines
- Implementation and interface development charged separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Egencia if
- You need policy and approval engine.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want negotiated rate loading.
Choose Shiji if
- You need daylight pms.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want infrasys pos.
Questions people ask
- Is Egencia or Shiji better?
- Neither clearly leads. Egencia starts at On request and Shiji at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Egencia or Shiji?
- Egencia starts at On request and Shiji at On request.
- Does Egencia or Shiji run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Egencia best used for?
- Egencia is most often used for a company of several hundred travellers wanting negotiated hotel rates without paying for a high-touch tmc, a finance team standardising on sap concur that wants booking data pre-populating expense reports, a multi-country employer needing consolidated duty of care reporting on where staff are travelling, an organisation moving off a regional tmc and wanting one supplier across europe and north america. Of those, a company of several hundred travellers wanting negotiated hotel rates without paying for a high-touch tmc and a finance team standardising on sap concur that wants booking data pre-populating expense reports are not what Shiji is typically brought in for.
- What can Egencia do that Shiji cannot?
- Egencia covers Policy and approval engine, Negotiated rate loading, Traveller tracking, Agent support. Shiji covers Daylight PMS, Infrasys POS, Payments, Distribution.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Egencia: Is Egencia still sold under its own name?
Yes. Amex GBT bought it in 2021 and kept the brand, relaunching it in 2026 with a conversational AI assistant and a Concur Expense integration.
Shiji: What do you actually buy from Shiji?
Most commonly Daylight PMS, Infrasys point of sale, or both, plus payments. The group name covers a wider portfolio than any one hotel purchases.
Egencia: How is it different from Amex GBT itself?
Egencia is the more self-service, lower-touch tier of the same company, aimed at mid-market programmes; Amex GBT proper is the high-touch enterprise service.
Shiji: Does Chinese ownership matter?
It can. For United States government-adjacent business and some corporate accounts it triggers data residency and supply chain review, so raise it at the start of procurement rather than at contract stage.
Egencia: Does it replace an expense system?
No. It books travel and feeds data to expense tools such as SAP Concur; you still need an expense product.
Shiji: Is Shiji an alternative to Oracle Hospitality?
Yes, and that is largely its positioning at the enterprise end, particularly in international luxury groups where Infrasys already has deployment.
Shiji: Can a single hotel buy it?
In principle, but the commercial model, implementation cost and support structure assume a group, and small properties are better served elsewhere.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Egencia vs Corporate Traveller
- Egencia vs BCD TripSource
- Egencia vs Sabre Red 360
- Egencia vs myCWT
- Egencia vs Travelport Smartpoint
- Egencia vs Amadeus Selling Platform Connect
- Egencia vs Spotnana
- Egencia vs Bokun
- Egencia vs FareHarbor
- Egencia vs Careem
- Egencia vs Didi
- Egencia vs Protel
- Egencia vs Center
- Egencia vs Chekin
- Egencia vs Clock PMS+
- Egencia vs Duetto
- Egencia vs Hostfully
- Egencia vs Hotelogix
- Egencia vs Opera PMS
- Egencia vs Stayntouch
- Egencia vs Mews
- Egencia vs WebRezPro
- Egencia vs Grab
- Egencia vs IDeaS
- Egencia vs Bookinglayer
- Egencia vs Apaleo
- Egencia vs Tokeet
- Egencia vs TrustYou
- Egencia vs Bolt
- Egencia vs Lodgify
- Shiji vs Corporate Traveller
- Shiji vs BCD TripSource
- Shiji vs Sabre Red 360
- Shiji vs myCWT
- Shiji vs Travelport Smartpoint
- Shiji vs Amadeus Selling Platform Connect
- Shiji vs Spotnana
- Shiji vs Bokun
- Shiji vs FareHarbor
- Shiji vs Careem
- Shiji vs Didi
- Shiji vs Protel
- Shiji vs Center
- Shiji vs Chekin
- Shiji vs Clock PMS+
- Shiji vs Duetto
- Shiji vs Hostfully
- Shiji vs Hotelogix
- Shiji vs Opera PMS
- Shiji vs Stayntouch
- Shiji vs Mews
- Shiji vs WebRezPro
- Shiji vs Grab
- Shiji vs IDeaS
- Shiji vs Bookinglayer
- Shiji vs Apaleo
- Shiji vs Tokeet
- Shiji vs TrustYou
- Shiji vs Bolt
- Shiji vs Lodgify
