Marketing · head to head
Moz vs OnCrawl

Moz
Marketing
SEO platform built around Domain Authority, local listings management and a weekly campaign workflow
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

OnCrawl
SEO
Technical SEO crawler that joins crawl data with server log files
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Moz has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Moz moz refreshes its link index less often and discovers fewer links than Ahrefs, so a new backlink frequently appears in Ahrefs days before it shows up in Link Explorer, which matters if link acquisition reporting is your job.; OnCrawl no pricing is published anywhere on the site, so early-stage comparison against Botify or Lumar requires getting quotes from all three before any evaluation can start.
- They diverge on capability: Moz covers Keyword Explorer, OnCrawl covers Log file analysis.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Moz and OnCrawl actually diverge.
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Moz
- Keyword Explorer
- Link Explorer
- Site Crawl
- Rank Tracking
- Page Optimization
- Competitive research
- Local SEO tools
- Fresh Web Explorer
Only in OnCrawl
- Log file analysis
- Crawl and log cross-analysis
- Structured data and Core Web Vitals checks
- Data Explorer
- Google Search Console integration
- API access
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Moz
- SEO auditsnot OnCrawl
- Keyword researchnot OnCrawl
- Link buildingnot OnCrawl
- Local SEOnot OnCrawl
- Competitive analysisnot OnCrawl
OnCrawl
- A large publisher or marketplace diagnosing wasted crawl budget on parameterised or low-value URLsnot Moz
- A technical SEO team that needs server log data joined to crawl data, not just a crawl report on its ownnot Moz
- An enterprise site comparing crawl-plus-log platforms against Botify or Lumar before committing to a multi-year contractnot Moz
- A team wanting custom segmentation of crawl and log data without writing SQL against a raw exportnot Moz
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Moz
- Moz refreshes its link index less often and discovers fewer links than Ahrefs, so a new backlink frequently appears in Ahrefs days before it shows up in Link Explorer, which matters if link acquisition reporting is your job.
- Rank tracking is weekly on every tier, so a site watching a volatile SERP or validating a same-week change cannot see daily movement without buying a separate rank tracker.
- The Standard plan allows only 150 keyword queries a month, which a single afternoon of research exhausts, and the jump to a workable 5,000 queries means paying 179 USD a month rather than 99.
- Almost every limit is separately metered and separately billable: extra seats are 49 USD each, campaigns 10 USD, tracked keywords 20 USD per 200, crawl capacity 15 USD per 50,000 pages, so the real bill drifts well above the plan price.
- Domain Authority is a Moz score, not a Google ranking factor, and teams that optimise for it directly are optimising for a proxy that its own vendor sells.
- Moz Local is a separate subscription per location, so a business with twenty sites is buying a second product at twenty times the per-location price on top of Moz Pro.
OnCrawl
- No pricing is published anywhere on the site, so early-stage comparison against Botify or Lumar requires getting quotes from all three before any evaluation can start.
- Log file analysis requires the customer to actually supply raw server logs, which many marketing teams cannot get from their infrastructure team without a separate internal project.
- It is a smaller company than Botify, so enterprise buyers evaluating vendor stability and roadmap longevity weigh that against the lower likely price.
- The interface and terminology assume a working knowledge of crawl budget and log analysis concepts, so it is a poor fit for a generalist marketer without technical SEO background.
- Data retention periods are tied to plan tier, so historical trend analysis beyond the contracted retention window is not available without upgrading before the data would otherwise be purged.
Pricing, plan by plan
Moz
Free- Free toolsFree
- Domain Analysis and Domain Authority lookups
- Limited Keyword Explorer and Link Explorer queries
- Competitive Research and Brand Authority checks
- Starter$49/month
- Entry plan for an individual managing a single website
- Sits below Standard on the published pricing page
- Upgrade path into the campaign-based tiers
- Standard$99/month
- 79 USD per month billed annually, 950 USD for the first year
- 1 user seat
- 3 campaigns and 300 tracked keyword rankings
- Medium$179/month
- 143 USD per month billed annually, 1,719 USD for the first year
- 2 user seats
- 10 campaigns and 1,500 tracked keyword rankings
OnCrawl
On request- OnCrawl$undefined/month
- Priced by monthly crawl volume, log line volume and data retention
- Small-site, mid-market and enterprise tiers, all quote-based
- Free trial available on request
Which should you pick?
Choose Moz if
- You need keyword explorer.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want link explorer.
Choose OnCrawl if
- You need log file analysis.
- You also want crawl and log cross-analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is Moz or OnCrawl better?
- Neither clearly leads. Moz starts at Free and OnCrawl at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Moz or OnCrawl?
- Moz has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Moz and On request for OnCrawl.
- Does Moz or OnCrawl run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Moz for free?
- Yes. Moz has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. OnCrawl starts at On request.
- What is Moz best used for?
- Moz is most often used for seo audits, keyword research, link building, local seo. Of those, seo audits and keyword research are not what OnCrawl is typically brought in for.
- What can Moz do that OnCrawl cannot?
- Moz covers Keyword Explorer, Link Explorer, Site Crawl, Rank Tracking. OnCrawl covers Log file analysis, Crawl and log cross-analysis, Structured data and Core Web Vitals checks, Data Explorer.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Moz: How much does Moz Pro cost?
Starter is 49 USD a month for a single site. Standard is 99 USD a month or 79 USD billed annually, Medium 179 or 143, and Large 299 or 239. Moz lists first-year annual totals of 950, 1,719 and 2,868 USD respectively.
OnCrawl: Do I need to provide my own server logs?
Yes, log file analysis is only available if you can export raw access logs from your web server or CDN; without them OnCrawl functions as a crawler only.
Moz: Is Moz or Ahrefs better?
Ahrefs is the stronger choice for backlink depth, index freshness and competitive research, and its Lite plan is 129 USD against Moz Standard at 99. Moz is the better buy if you need Domain Authority as a reportable metric, if local listings management matters, or if 49 USD a month for a single site is the budget.
OnCrawl: How much does OnCrawl cost?
It is not published. Pricing is quoted based on crawl volume, log volume and retention period; get a quote before comparing it to Botify or Lumar.
Moz: What do the Moz free tools give you?
Free Domain Analysis with Domain Authority, limited Keyword Explorer and Link Explorer queries, Competitive Research, a Brand Authority check and MozCast volatility tracking. Campaigns, site crawls and rank tracking all require a paid plan.
OnCrawl: Is this suitable for a small business site?
Generally not economically; the log analysis capability that justifies the cost only pays off once a site is large enough that Google is not crawling every page anyway.
Moz: Is Domain Authority a Google ranking factor?
No. It is a Moz model that predicts ranking strength on a 1 to 100 scale. Google does not use it. It is useful as a comparative shorthand, not as a target.
Moz: How often does Moz update rankings?
Weekly on every Moz Pro tier. Competitors such as SE Ranking update daily as standard.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Moz vs Ahrefs
- Moz vs Vimeo
- Moz vs Mailgun
- Moz vs Leadpages
- Moz vs Postmark
- Moz vs Iterable
- Moz vs Customer.io
- Moz vs MoEngage
- Moz vs Instapage
- Moz vs Unbounce
- Moz vs Buffer
- Moz vs Hootsuite
- Moz vs Roxhill
- Moz vs Simple Analytics
- Moz vs Supermetrics
- Moz vs Swydo
- Moz vs Umami
- Moz vs Screaming Frog SEO Spider
- Moz vs Botify
- Moz vs Lumar
- Moz vs seoClarity
- Moz vs Sitebulb
- Moz vs SE Ranking
- Moz vs AccuRanker
- Moz vs Wincher
- Moz vs Advanced Web Ranking
- Moz vs SISTRIX
- Moz vs Mangools
- Moz vs Nightwatch
- Moz vs Ubersuggest
- Moz vs Yoast SEO
- Moz vs Google Search Console
- Moz vs Keyword Insights
- Moz vs Linkody
- OnCrawl vs Ahrefs
- OnCrawl vs Vimeo
- OnCrawl vs Mailgun
- OnCrawl vs Leadpages
- OnCrawl vs Postmark
- OnCrawl vs Iterable
- OnCrawl vs Customer.io
- OnCrawl vs MoEngage
- OnCrawl vs Instapage
- OnCrawl vs Unbounce
- OnCrawl vs Buffer
- OnCrawl vs Hootsuite
- OnCrawl vs Roxhill
- OnCrawl vs Simple Analytics
- OnCrawl vs Supermetrics
- OnCrawl vs Swydo
- OnCrawl vs Umami
- OnCrawl vs Screaming Frog SEO Spider
- OnCrawl vs Botify
- OnCrawl vs Lumar
- OnCrawl vs seoClarity
- OnCrawl vs Sitebulb
- OnCrawl vs SE Ranking
- OnCrawl vs AccuRanker
- OnCrawl vs Wincher
- OnCrawl vs Advanced Web Ranking
- OnCrawl vs SISTRIX
- OnCrawl vs Mangools
- OnCrawl vs Nightwatch
- OnCrawl vs Ubersuggest
- OnCrawl vs Yoast SEO
- OnCrawl vs Google Search Console
- OnCrawl vs Keyword Insights
- OnCrawl vs Linkody
