SEO · head to head
OnCrawl vs Sitebulb

OnCrawl
SEO
Technical SEO crawler that joins crawl data with server log files
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Sitebulb
SEO
Technical SEO audit tool that crawls sites and generates visual, prioritized hints
- From
- $95/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: OnCrawl no pricing is published anywhere on the site, so early-stage comparison against Botify or Lumar requires getting quotes from all three before any evaluation can start.; Sitebulb desktop plans are limited to a single user, so teams need Sitebulb Cloud or paid add-on seats to collaborate.
- They diverge on capability: OnCrawl covers Log file analysis, Sitebulb covers JavaScript crawling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OnCrawl and Sitebulb actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (SEO).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OnCrawl
- Log file analysis
- Crawl and log cross-analysis
- Structured data and Core Web Vitals checks
- Data Explorer
- Google Search Console integration
- API access
Only in Sitebulb
- JavaScript crawling
- Prioritized Hints
- Crawl maps
- Scheduled recurring audits
- Audit comparisons
- Google integrations
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OnCrawl
- A large publisher or marketplace diagnosing wasted crawl budget on parameterised or low-value URLsnot Sitebulb
- A technical SEO team that needs server log data joined to crawl data, not just a crawl report on its ownnot Sitebulb
- An enterprise site comparing crawl-plus-log platforms against Botify or Lumar before committing to a multi-year contractnot Sitebulb
- A team wanting custom segmentation of crawl and log data without writing SQL against a raw exportnot Sitebulb
Sitebulb
- Agencies running recurring technical SEO audits for clientsnot OnCrawl
- In-house SEO teams tracking site health over timenot OnCrawl
- Auditing JavaScript-rendered sites for crawlability issuesnot OnCrawl
- Benchmarking site architecture via crawl visualizationsnot OnCrawl
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OnCrawl
- No pricing is published anywhere on the site, so early-stage comparison against Botify or Lumar requires getting quotes from all three before any evaluation can start.
- Log file analysis requires the customer to actually supply raw server logs, which many marketing teams cannot get from their infrastructure team without a separate internal project.
- It is a smaller company than Botify, so enterprise buyers evaluating vendor stability and roadmap longevity weigh that against the lower likely price.
- The interface and terminology assume a working knowledge of crawl budget and log analysis concepts, so it is a poor fit for a generalist marketer without technical SEO background.
- Data retention periods are tied to plan tier, so historical trend analysis beyond the contracted retention window is not available without upgrading before the data would otherwise be purged.
Sitebulb
- Desktop plans are limited to a single user, so teams need Sitebulb Cloud or paid add-on seats to collaborate.
- Large sites near or above the 500,000 URL Pro limit require reconfiguration or the Cloud tier to avoid hitting crawl caps.
- Desktop crawling relies on local machine resources, so audit speed and scale depend on the user's hardware rather than cloud infrastructure.
Pricing, plan by plan
OnCrawl
On request- OnCrawl$undefined/month
- Priced by monthly crawl volume, log line volume and data retention
- Small-site, mid-market and enterprise tiers, all quote-based
- Free trial available on request
Sitebulb
$95/month- Lite$undefined/month
- 1 user
- 10,000 URLs per audit
- 100+ Hints
- Pro$undefined/month
- 1 user
- 500,000 URLs per audit
- 300+ Hints
- Sitebulb Cloud$undefined/month
- 2+ users
- No project limits
- Automated recurring crawls
Which should you pick?
Choose OnCrawl if
- You need log file analysis.
- You also want crawl and log cross-analysis.
Choose Sitebulb if
- You need javascript crawling.
- You work on web, windows, mac.
- You also want prioritized hints.
Questions people ask
- Is OnCrawl or Sitebulb better?
- Neither clearly leads. OnCrawl starts at On request and Sitebulb at $95/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OnCrawl or Sitebulb?
- OnCrawl starts at On request and Sitebulb at $95/month.
- Does OnCrawl or Sitebulb run on more platforms?
- OnCrawl runs on Web. Sitebulb runs on web, windows, mac.
- What is OnCrawl best used for?
- OnCrawl is most often used for a large publisher or marketplace diagnosing wasted crawl budget on parameterised or low-value urls, a technical seo team that needs server log data joined to crawl data, not just a crawl report on its own, an enterprise site comparing crawl-plus-log platforms against botify or lumar before committing to a multi-year contract, a team wanting custom segmentation of crawl and log data without writing sql against a raw export. Of those, a large publisher or marketplace diagnosing wasted crawl budget on parameterised or low-value urls and a technical seo team that needs server log data joined to crawl data, not just a crawl report on its own are not what Sitebulb is typically brought in for.
- What can OnCrawl do that Sitebulb cannot?
- OnCrawl covers Log file analysis, Crawl and log cross-analysis, Structured data and Core Web Vitals checks, Data Explorer. Sitebulb covers JavaScript crawling, Prioritized Hints, Crawl maps, Scheduled recurring audits.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OnCrawl: Do I need to provide my own server logs?
Yes, log file analysis is only available if you can export raw access logs from your web server or CDN; without them OnCrawl functions as a crawler only.
Sitebulb: Is there a free trial?
Sitebulb offers a 14-day free trial with no credit card required and no up-front commitment.
SourceOnCrawl: How much does OnCrawl cost?
It is not published. Pricing is quoted based on crawl volume, log volume and retention period; get a quote before comparing it to Botify or Lumar.
Sitebulb: Can I cancel anytime?
Yes, subscriptions can be cancelled anytime and users are never locked into a contract.
SourceOnCrawl: Is this suitable for a small business site?
Generally not economically; the log analysis capability that justifies the cost only pays off once a site is large enough that Google is not crawling every page anyway.
Sitebulb: What does Sitebulb integrate with?
Sitebulb connects to Google Analytics, Google Search Console, Google Sheets, and Google Data Studio to pull data into audit reports.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- OnCrawl vs Screaming Frog SEO Spider
- OnCrawl vs Botify
- OnCrawl vs Lumar
- OnCrawl vs seoClarity
- OnCrawl vs SE Ranking
- OnCrawl vs AccuRanker
- OnCrawl vs Wincher
- OnCrawl vs Advanced Web Ranking
- OnCrawl vs SISTRIX
- OnCrawl vs Mangools
- OnCrawl vs Nightwatch
- OnCrawl vs Ubersuggest
- OnCrawl vs Yoast SEO
- OnCrawl vs Google Search Console
- OnCrawl vs Keyword Insights
- OnCrawl vs Linkody
- OnCrawl vs SEMrush
- OnCrawl vs Lighthouse
- OnCrawl vs MarketMuse
- OnCrawl vs AnswerThePublic
- OnCrawl vs Conductor
- OnCrawl vs Rank Math
- Sitebulb vs Screaming Frog SEO Spider
- Sitebulb vs Botify
- Sitebulb vs Lumar
- Sitebulb vs seoClarity
- Sitebulb vs SE Ranking
- Sitebulb vs AccuRanker
- Sitebulb vs Wincher
- Sitebulb vs Advanced Web Ranking
- Sitebulb vs SISTRIX
- Sitebulb vs Mangools
- Sitebulb vs Nightwatch
- Sitebulb vs Ubersuggest
- Sitebulb vs Yoast SEO
- Sitebulb vs Google Search Console
- Sitebulb vs Keyword Insights
- Sitebulb vs Linkody
- Sitebulb vs SEMrush
- Sitebulb vs Lighthouse
- Sitebulb vs MarketMuse
- Sitebulb vs AnswerThePublic
- Sitebulb vs Conductor
- Sitebulb vs Rank Math
