Marketing · head to head
Microsoft Clarity vs Onclusive

Microsoft Clarity
Marketing
Free behaviour analytics tool with session recordings, heatmaps, and AI insights
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Onclusive
Marketing
Media monitoring, journalist database and PR measurement assembled from six acquired companies
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Microsoft Clarity has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Microsoft Clarity no paid tier means no premium support; enterprise SLAs and dedicated account management are unavailable; Onclusive onclusive was assembled from at least six acquired companies inside about a year, and users still encounter different interfaces, inconsistent data definitions and separate support paths depending on which module they are in, so training and internal reporting are harder than a single-product vendor.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Microsoft Clarity and Onclusive actually diverge.
| Attribute | Microsoft Clarity | Onclusive |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | free | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android, API |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Marketing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Microsoft Clarity
Nothing recorded that Onclusive does not also cover.
Only in Onclusive
- Global media monitoring
- Broadcast monitoring
- Social listening
- Media contacts database
- Newsroom and press office
- Sentiment and tone analysis
- Share of voice reporting
- Crisis detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Microsoft Clarity
- SaaS product teams identifying checkout and signup funnel frictionnot Onclusive
- E-commerce sites optimising product discovery and purchase flowsnot Onclusive
- Content websites understanding reading patterns and article engagementnot Onclusive
- Mobile app teams (iOS/Android) analysing user journey and drop-off pointsnot Onclusive
- B2B platforms optimising onboarding and feature discoverynot Onclusive
- Agencies and consultants providing UX analysis to clients free of chargenot Onclusive
Onclusive
- A multinational communications team that needs print, broadcast and online coverage across twenty markets reported in one dashboard rather than through three regional vendorsnot Microsoft Clarity
- A public affairs team that must evidence share of voice against named competitors for a quarterly board reportnot Microsoft Clarity
- A PR agency running press office and media enquiry workflow for several client brands from one systemnot Microsoft Clarity
- A corporate affairs function that needs early warning on a coverage spike outside its own time zone, with broadcast clips retrievable for legal reviewnot Microsoft Clarity
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Microsoft Clarity
- No paid tier means no premium support; enterprise SLAs and dedicated account management are unavailable
- Dependency on JavaScript tracking; websites with strict CSP (content security policy) may struggle with integration
- Session replay is limited to browser-based interactions; native app behaviour in web wrappers is not captured
- AI Chat and summaries require adequate session volume; low-traffic sites lack sufficient data for meaningful pattern detection
- Privacy masking is automatic but lacks granular configuration; custom masking rules for proprietary data require workarounds
Onclusive
- Onclusive was assembled from at least six acquired companies inside about a year, and users still encounter different interfaces, inconsistent data definitions and separate support paths depending on which module they are in, so training and internal reporting are harder than a single-product vendor.
- Pricing is not published and is scoped by market coverage, source count and user seats, which makes competitive benchmarking difficult and means renewal increases are hard to challenge without a parallel quote from Cision or Meltwater.
- Broadcast monitoring coverage is uneven by country, so a global contract can look complete on paper while a specific market you care about has thin local radio or regional television coverage; verify your priority markets by name before signing.
- The company carries private-equity ownership and acquisition-related debt financing, which historically in this category has meant pressure on support headcount and above-inflation renewal pricing rather than product investment.
- Automated sentiment classification on news copy remains error-prone, especially for irony, quoted criticism and industry jargon, so teams reporting sentiment to executives generally need a human review step that erodes the labour saving the tool was bought for.
Pricing, plan by plan
Microsoft Clarity
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Microsoft Clarity review.
Onclusive
On request- Onclusive$undefined/year
- Global media monitoring
- Broadcast and print coverage
- Onclusive Social listening
Which should you pick?
Choose Microsoft Clarity if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
Choose Onclusive if
- You need global media monitoring.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want broadcast monitoring.
Questions people ask
- Is Microsoft Clarity or Onclusive better?
- Neither clearly leads. Microsoft Clarity starts at Free and Onclusive at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Microsoft Clarity or Onclusive?
- Microsoft Clarity has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Microsoft Clarity and On request for Onclusive.
- Does Microsoft Clarity or Onclusive run on more platforms?
- Microsoft Clarity runs on Web, iOS, Android. Onclusive runs on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- Can I use Microsoft Clarity for free?
- Yes. Microsoft Clarity has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Onclusive starts at On request.
- What is Microsoft Clarity best used for?
- Microsoft Clarity is most often used for saas product teams identifying checkout and signup funnel friction, e-commerce sites optimising product discovery and purchase flows, content websites understanding reading patterns and article engagement, mobile app teams (ios/android) analysing user journey and drop-off points. Of those, saas product teams identifying checkout and signup funnel friction and e-commerce sites optimising product discovery and purchase flows are not what Onclusive is typically brought in for.
- What can Microsoft Clarity do that Onclusive cannot?
- Onclusive covers Global media monitoring, Broadcast monitoring, Social listening, Media contacts database.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Microsoft Clarity: Is Microsoft Clarity truly free?
Yes. Microsoft Clarity is completely free with no traffic limits, no paid tier, and no restrictions based on session volume. It integrates with web properties via a single tracking snippet.
SourceOnclusive: Is Onclusive one product or several?
Several. It was formed from Kantar Reputation Intelligence, PRgloo and the original Onclusive in January 2022, then absorbed Critical Mention and Digimind later that year, and the modules retain distinguishable lineages.
Microsoft Clarity: Does Clarity comply with GDPR and CCPA?
Yes. Clarity automatically masks sensitive form field data before transmission and supports privacy-by-default configuration. EU and California data residency options are available.
SourceOnclusive: Who owns it?
Symphony Technology Group, a US private equity firm, with debt financing on the Critical Mention acquisition from Stellus Capital Management.
Microsoft Clarity: Can Clarity track mobile apps?
Yes. Clarity provides native SDKs for iOS and Android, as well as support for React Native and Flutter apps.
SourceOnclusive: What happened to Digimind?
Digimind was acquired in July 2022 and rebranded as Onclusive Social in October 2022. If social listening is your main requirement, that is the platform you are evaluating.
Onclusive: Does it publish pricing?
No. Contracts are annual and quoted according to markets monitored, sources covered and seat count.
Related pages
More on Microsoft Clarity
Other head to heads
- Microsoft Clarity vs Crazy Egg
- Microsoft Clarity vs Ruler Analytics
- Microsoft Clarity vs VWO
- Microsoft Clarity vs Northbeam
- Microsoft Clarity vs Lucky Orange
- Microsoft Clarity vs Leadpages
- Microsoft Clarity vs Octoboard
- Microsoft Clarity vs Unbounce
- Microsoft Clarity vs Vimeo
- Microsoft Clarity vs Google Analytics
- Microsoft Clarity vs Instapage
- Microsoft Clarity vs Madgicx
- Microsoft Clarity vs Marketing Evolution
- Microsoft Clarity vs Mautic
- Microsoft Clarity vs Netcore Cloud
- Microsoft Clarity vs Roxhill
- Microsoft Clarity vs Buffer
- Microsoft Clarity vs Hootsuite
- Microsoft Clarity vs Bloomreach
- Microsoft Clarity vs Freshpaint
- Microsoft Clarity vs Umami
- Microsoft Clarity vs Moz
- Microsoft Clarity vs MoEngage
- Microsoft Clarity vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Microsoft Clarity vs Adverity
- Microsoft Clarity vs Whatagraph
- Microsoft Clarity vs Optimizely
- Microsoft Clarity vs Attribution
- Microsoft Clarity vs Countly
- Onclusive vs Crazy Egg
- Onclusive vs Ruler Analytics
- Onclusive vs VWO
- Onclusive vs Northbeam
- Onclusive vs Lucky Orange
- Onclusive vs Leadpages
- Onclusive vs Octoboard
- Onclusive vs Unbounce
- Onclusive vs Vimeo
- Onclusive vs Google Analytics
- Onclusive vs Instapage
- Onclusive vs Madgicx
- Onclusive vs Marketing Evolution
- Onclusive vs Mautic
- Onclusive vs Netcore Cloud
- Onclusive vs Roxhill
- Onclusive vs Buffer
- Onclusive vs Hootsuite
- Onclusive vs Bloomreach
- Onclusive vs Freshpaint
- Onclusive vs Umami
- Onclusive vs Moz
- Onclusive vs MoEngage
- Onclusive vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Onclusive vs Adverity
- Onclusive vs Whatagraph
- Onclusive vs Optimizely
- Onclusive vs Attribution
- Onclusive vs Countly
