Softwr

Marketing · head to head

Bloomreach vs Microsoft Clarity

Bloomreach logo

Bloomreach

Marketing

Ecommerce search, merchandising and customer engagement sold as three separately bought products

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Microsoft Clarity logo

Microsoft Clarity

Marketing

Free behaviour analytics tool with session recordings, heatmaps, and AI insights

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only Microsoft Clarity has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Bloomreach the three products have separate origins, separate pricing units and separate onboarding, so a single bundled quote hides which parts you are actually committing to.; Microsoft Clarity no paid tier means no premium support; enterprise SLAs and dedicated account management are unavailable
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Bloomreach and Microsoft Clarity actually diverge.

Attributes where Bloomreach and Microsoft Clarity differ
AttributeBloomreachMicrosoft Clarity
Starting priceOn requestFree
Pricing modelquotefree
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsWeb, iOS, Android, REST APIWeb, iOS, Android

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Marketing).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Bloomreach

  • Engagement CDP
  • Campaign orchestration
  • Discovery search
  • Recommendations
  • Jinja templating
  • Reports and dashboards

Only in Microsoft Clarity

Nothing recorded that Bloomreach does not also cover.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Bloomreach

  • A retailer replacing a legacy ESP that needs event-level segmentation rather than list-based sendingnot Microsoft Clarity
  • Merchandising a large catalogue where site search relevance is the main conversion levernot Microsoft Clarity
  • Building weblayers and email content from the same customer profile without duplicating logic in two toolsnot Microsoft Clarity
  • Running campaign analytics over raw events instead of exporting to a separate warehouse and BI stacknot Microsoft Clarity

Microsoft Clarity

  • SaaS product teams identifying checkout and signup funnel frictionnot Bloomreach
  • E-commerce sites optimising product discovery and purchase flowsnot Bloomreach
  • Content websites understanding reading patterns and article engagementnot Bloomreach
  • Mobile app teams (iOS/Android) analysing user journey and drop-off pointsnot Bloomreach
  • B2B platforms optimising onboarding and feature discoverynot Bloomreach
  • Agencies and consultants providing UX analysis to clients free of chargenot Bloomreach

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Bloomreach

  • The three products have separate origins, separate pricing units and separate onboarding, so a single bundled quote hides which parts you are actually committing to.
  • Engagement is priced on tracked profiles, so a customer database that keeps every inactive account raises the bill whether or not those people are ever messaged.
  • The flexibility of the data model and Jinja templating needs technical ownership, and marketing teams without a developer typically use a fraction of the product they pay for.
  • Content is the least invested of the three lines and buyers evaluating it against dedicated headless CMS vendors usually find the gap widening.
  • Support and implementation quality vary between the Bratislava engineering base for Engagement and the US organisation, and escalation paths differ by product.

Microsoft Clarity

  • No paid tier means no premium support; enterprise SLAs and dedicated account management are unavailable
  • Dependency on JavaScript tracking; websites with strict CSP (content security policy) may struggle with integration
  • Session replay is limited to browser-based interactions; native app behaviour in web wrappers is not captured
  • AI Chat and summaries require adequate session volume; low-traffic sites lack sufficient data for meaningful pattern detection
  • Privacy masking is automatic but lacks granular configuration; custom masking rules for proprietary data require workarounds

Pricing, plan by plan

Bloomreach

On request
  • Bloomreach Engagement$undefined/year
    • Priced by tracked customer profiles and event volume
    • Channels and AI modules licensed separately
    • Annual contract
  • Bloomreach Discovery$undefined/year
    • Priced by search and recommendation request volume
    • Catalogue size and traffic bands
    • Annual contract

Microsoft Clarity

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the Microsoft Clarity review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Bloomreach if

  • You need engagement cdp.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android, REST API.
  • You also want campaign orchestration.
Bloomreach review

Choose Microsoft Clarity if

  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
Microsoft Clarity review

Questions people ask

Is Bloomreach or Microsoft Clarity better?
Neither clearly leads. Bloomreach starts at On request and Microsoft Clarity at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Bloomreach or Microsoft Clarity?
Microsoft Clarity has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Bloomreach and Free for Microsoft Clarity.
Does Bloomreach or Microsoft Clarity run on more platforms?
Bloomreach runs on Web, iOS, Android, REST API. Microsoft Clarity runs on Web, iOS, Android.
Can I use Microsoft Clarity for free?
Yes. Microsoft Clarity has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Bloomreach starts at On request.
What is Bloomreach best used for?
Bloomreach is most often used for a retailer replacing a legacy esp that needs event-level segmentation rather than list-based sending, merchandising a large catalogue where site search relevance is the main conversion lever, building weblayers and email content from the same customer profile without duplicating logic in two tools, running campaign analytics over raw events instead of exporting to a separate warehouse and bi stack. Of those, a retailer replacing a legacy esp that needs event-level segmentation rather than list-based sending and merchandising a large catalogue where site search relevance is the main conversion lever are not what Microsoft Clarity is typically brought in for.
What can Bloomreach do that Microsoft Clarity cannot?
Bloomreach covers Engagement CDP, Campaign orchestration, Discovery search, Recommendations.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Bloomreach: Is Engagement just Exponea renamed?

It is the Exponea product line, continued and extended after the 2021 acquisition, with its engineering still centred in Slovakia. Buying it standalone is common.

Microsoft Clarity: Is Microsoft Clarity truly free?

Yes. Microsoft Clarity is completely free with no traffic limits, no paid tier, and no restrictions based on session volume. It integrates with web properties via a single tracking snippet.

Source
Bloomreach: Do we have to take Discovery to get Engagement?

No. They are sold and priced separately, and plenty of customers run Engagement alongside a different search vendor.

Microsoft Clarity: Does Clarity comply with GDPR and CCPA?

Yes. Clarity automatically masks sensitive form field data before transmission and supports privacy-by-default configuration. EU and California data residency options are available.

Source
Bloomreach: How is it priced?

Engagement by tracked profiles and event volume, Discovery by request volume. Neither is published, and both are annual commitments.

Microsoft Clarity: Can Clarity track mobile apps?

Yes. Clarity provides native SDKs for iOS and Android, as well as support for React Native and Flutter apps.

Source
Share

Related pages

More on Bloomreach

More on Microsoft Clarity

Keep looking

Other head to heads