Softwr

CRM · head to head

Krayin vs RingCentral Contact Center

Krayin logo

Krayin

CRM

Open source Laravel CRM for sales teams that want to own the code

From
Free
Free plan
Yes
RingCentral Contact Center logo

RingCentral Contact Center

Customer Support

Intelligent, connected, omnichannel contact center

From
On request
Free plan
No

The short version

  • Only Krayin has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Krayin it is far less mature than EspoCRM, SuiteCRM or Vtiger, with thinner reporting, weaker forecasting and fewer built-in integrations, so evaluations that start from a feature checklist will not favour it.; RingCentral Contact Center no pricing details published on contact center product pages
  • They diverge on capability: Krayin covers Lead pipelines, RingCentral Contact Center covers Omnichannel routing.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Krayin and RingCentral Contact Center actually diverge.

Attributes where Krayin and RingCentral Contact Center differ
AttributeKrayinRingCentral Contact Center
Starting priceFreeOn request
Pricing modelOpen source, no licence feesubscription
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsWeb, Self-hosted, Docker, LinuxWeb, Desktop, Ios, Android
CategoryCRMCustomer Support
FoundedUnknown1999

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Krayin

  • Lead pipelines
  • Contacts and organisations
  • Quotes
  • Workflow automation
  • Email integration
  • Custom attributes
  • Roles and permissions
  • Laravel package architecture

Only in RingCentral Contact Center

  • Omnichannel routing
  • IVR
  • WFM
  • Quality management
  • Speech analytics
  • AI capabilities
  • Salesforce
  • ServiceNow

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Krayin

  • A PHP or Laravel development shop wants a CRM it can fork and rebrand for clients without paying per seat or negotiating an OEM licence.not RingCentral Contact Center
  • An organisation under data residency rules needs the customer database physically on its own infrastructure, which rules out every hosted CRM.not RingCentral Contact Center
  • A small sales team wants an unlimited-user CRM where adding a tenth or fiftieth user costs nothing beyond server capacity.not RingCentral Contact Center
  • A Bagisto ecommerce store wants a CRM from the same vendor that shares its technology stack and conventions rather than a bridged integration.not RingCentral Contact Center

RingCentral Contact Center

  • Unified communicationsnot Krayin
  • Contact centernot Krayin
  • Customer experiencenot Krayin

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Krayin

  • It is far less mature than EspoCRM, SuiteCRM or Vtiger, with thinner reporting, weaker forecasting and fewer built-in integrations, so evaluations that start from a feature checklist will not favour it.
  • Practical functionality such as certain telephony, messaging and marketing connectors sits in paid marketplace extensions from Webkul, so the free CRM plus the extensions you actually need is not free.
  • The roadmap is controlled by a single services company whose revenue depends on selling implementation and extensions, so there is a structural incentive against making the core complete.
  • You are responsible for the whole operational burden: PHP and MySQL hosting, backups, security patching, mail deliverability and upgrades, and a botched upgrade of a customised install is your problem alone.
  • The cloud hosting page does not publish prices, so the managed option that would remove that burden cannot be budgeted without contacting sales, which undercuts the transparency the open licence otherwise offers.

RingCentral Contact Center

  • No pricing details published on contact center product pages
  • Enterprise customers must contact sales for pricing
  • Feature comparison guide does not include cost information

Pricing, plan by plan

Krayin

Free
  • Self-hostedFree
    • Full MIT-licensed source
    • Unlimited users
    • No feature gating
  • Cloud hosting and extensions$undefined/month
    • Starter and Pro managed hosting packs from Webkul
    • Premium extensions sold individually in the Krayin marketplace
    • White label and custom development quoted separately

RingCentral Contact Center

On request
  • Essentials$undefined/month
    • Voice
    • Digital
    • IVR
  • Standard$undefined/month
    • Essentials + WFM
    • Quality management
  • Premium$undefined/month
    • Standard + AI
    • Speech analytics

Which should you pick?

Choose Krayin if

  • You need lead pipelines.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Self-hosted, Docker, Linux.
  • You also want contacts and organisations.

Choose RingCentral Contact Center if

  • You need omnichannel routing.
  • You work on Web, Desktop, Ios, Android.
  • You also want ivr.

Questions people ask

Is Krayin or RingCentral Contact Center better?
Neither clearly leads. Krayin starts at Free and RingCentral Contact Center at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Krayin or RingCentral Contact Center?
Krayin has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Krayin and On request for RingCentral Contact Center.
Does Krayin or RingCentral Contact Center run on more platforms?
Krayin runs on Web, Self-hosted, Docker, Linux. RingCentral Contact Center runs on Web, Desktop, Ios, Android.
Can I use Krayin for free?
Yes. Krayin has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. RingCentral Contact Center starts at On request.
What is Krayin best used for?
Krayin is most often used for a php or laravel development shop wants a crm it can fork and rebrand for clients without paying per seat or negotiating an oem licence., an organisation under data residency rules needs the customer database physically on its own infrastructure, which rules out every hosted crm., a small sales team wants an unlimited-user crm where adding a tenth or fiftieth user costs nothing beyond server capacity., a bagisto ecommerce store wants a crm from the same vendor that shares its technology stack and conventions rather than a bridged integration.. Of those, a php or laravel development shop wants a crm it can fork and rebrand for clients without paying per seat or negotiating an oem licence. and an organisation under data residency rules needs the customer database physically on its own infrastructure, which rules out every hosted crm. are not what RingCentral Contact Center is typically brought in for.
What can Krayin do that RingCentral Contact Center cannot?
Krayin covers Lead pipelines, Contacts and organisations, Quotes, Workflow automation. RingCentral Contact Center covers Omnichannel routing, IVR, WFM, Quality management.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Krayin: Is Krayin really free?

The CRM itself is MIT licensed with no user limit and no enterprise edition. Premium extensions, managed hosting and custom development from Webkul are paid.

RingCentral Contact Center: How much does RingCentral Contact Center cost?

Specific pricing is not published. RingCentral Contact Center is a custom-quote enterprise product where costs depend on deployment, features, and usage.

Source
Krayin: Who maintains it?

Webkul Software of Noida, India, the same company behind the Bagisto open source ecommerce platform.

RingCentral Contact Center: What is the pricing model for RingCentral Contact Center?

RingCentral Contact Center operates on a quote-based model. Customers must contact sales to receive pricing based on their specific requirements and scale.

Source
Krayin: What do I need to run it?

A standard LAMP or LEMP stack with PHP, Composer and MySQL or MariaDB. Any host that runs Laravel will run Krayin.

Krayin: How does it compare to EspoCRM?

EspoCRM is more mature with deeper reporting and a longer track record. Krayin is easier for a Laravel developer to extend and has a more permissive licence.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads