Healthcare · head to head
Kareo vs Therapixel
Therapixel
Healthcare
French mammography AI with FDA clearances for 2D and tomosynthesis breast screening
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kareo kareo is now part of Tebra and sold under the Tebra brand rather than as a standalone product; Therapixel european and American regulatory positions were established under different regimes, and under the EU Medical Device Regulation this class of diagnostic AI faces a higher classification and notified body scrutiny, so European buyers must verify the current MDR certificate and expiry rather than relying on a legacy CE reference.
- They diverge on capability: Kareo covers Electronic Health Records, Therapixel covers MammoScreen 2D.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kareo and Therapixel actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kareo | Therapixel |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $99/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Mobile | Web |
| Founded | 2010 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kareo
- Electronic Health Records
- Scheduling
- Patient Portal
- Medical Billing
- Payment Processing
- Labs
- Pharmacies
- Clearinghouses
Only in Therapixel
- MammoScreen 2D
- MammoScreen DBT
- One to ten suspicion score
- Summary report
- Workstation and PACS delivery
- Reading workflow configurations
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kareo
- Practice management, scheduling and billing for independent medical practicesnot Therapixel
- Electronic health records and e-prescribing for small clinicsnot Therapixel
- Insurance claim submission and patient payment collectionnot Therapixel
Therapixel
- A European breast screening programme running mandatory double reading that wants to evaluate AI as a concurrent or second reader within what national guidance permitsnot Kareo
- An American breast centre that has moved to tomosynthesis and needs reading support on DBT specifically, which Therapixel holds a clearance fornot Kareo
- A screening service wanting a graded suspicion score rather than a binary flag so readers can calibrate their own thresholdnot Kareo
- A radiology group evaluating multiple mammography AI vendors head to head on their own historic case set before committingnot Kareo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kareo
- Kareo is now part of Tebra and sold under the Tebra brand rather than as a standalone product
- Tebra publishes no rate: pricing varies with provider count, features and implementation requirements and is quoted during a demo
- Billing counts clinical providers such as MDs, DOs, NPs and PAs, so adding a prescriber raises the bill even though non clinical staff are free
- Electronic prescribing of controlled substances setup costs about $75 per provider as a one time fee
- PDMP integration costs $500 one time per facility plus about $50 per user per year
Therapixel
- European and American regulatory positions were established under different regimes, and under the EU Medical Device Regulation this class of diagnostic AI faces a higher classification and notified body scrutiny, so European buyers must verify the current MDR certificate and expiry rather than relying on a legacy CE reference.
- MammoScreen does mammography only, so a hospital wanting AI across head CT, chest and breast needs several vendors and several PACS integrations, or an orchestration layer bought from someone else.
- Therapixel is a small French company competing against Hologic and iCAD, which have incumbency inside the mammography reading workstation, so integration into an American breast centre is more work than it is for the workstation vendor own AI.
- Detection performance is sensitive to the mammography unit vendor and acquisition protocol, so published results do not transfer between estates and each site needs local validation it must fund itself.
- Whether AI can substitute for one of two human readers is a national workforce and liability question, not a product capability, so the labour saving that justifies the purchase in one country is not permitted in another.
Pricing, plan by plan
Kareo
$99/month- Starter$99/month
- EHR
- Scheduling
- Patient Portal
- Professional$199/month
- Everything in Starter
- Billing
- Reporting
Therapixel
On request- MammoScreen$undefined/year
- Priced per examination or by annual screening volume
- 2D and tomosynthesis licensed by the versions cleared for each
- Cloud or on premises deployment quoted differently
Which should you pick?
Choose Kareo if
- You need electronic health records.
- You work on Web, Mobile.
- You also want scheduling.
Questions people ask
- Is Kareo or Therapixel better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kareo starts at $99/month and Therapixel at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kareo or Therapixel?
- Kareo starts at $99/month and Therapixel at On request.
- Does Kareo or Therapixel run on more platforms?
- Kareo runs on Web, Mobile. Therapixel runs on Web.
- What is Kareo best used for?
- Kareo is most often used for practice management, scheduling and billing for independent medical practices, electronic health records and e-prescribing for small clinics, insurance claim submission and patient payment collection. Of those, practice management, scheduling and billing for independent medical practices and electronic health records and e-prescribing for small clinics are not what Therapixel is typically brought in for.
- What can Kareo do that Therapixel cannot?
- Kareo covers Electronic Health Records, Scheduling, Patient Portal, Medical Billing. Therapixel covers MammoScreen 2D, MammoScreen DBT, One to ten suspicion score, Summary report.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kareo: Does Kareo publish its pricing?
No. Kareo (now rebranded as Tebra) uses custom per-practice pricing that varies based on the number of providers, features needed, and implementation requirements. Pricing is determined during a demo with the sales team.
SourceTherapixel: Is MammoScreen FDA cleared?
Yes. It holds 510(k) clearance K192854 for two dimensional mammography from July 2020, a November 2021 clearance for digital breast tomosynthesis, and two further clearances in October 2024 for later versions.
Kareo: Are there discounts for adding multiple modules?
Yes. Tebra states that many practices qualify for bundled pricing or volume incentives when adopting multiple modules like EHR, billing, and patient experience tools together.
SourceTherapixel: Is it CE marked?
Yes, but European buyers should ask specifically for the current certificate under the Medical Device Regulation and its expiry date, because this class of diagnostic AI moved to a higher classification under MDR.
Kareo: What are the additional costs for controlled substance prescribing?
For providers who prescribe controlled substances, EPCS setup costs approximately $75 per provider as a one-time fee, and PDMP integration costs $500 one-time per facility plus around $50 per user per year.
SourceTherapixel: What does the one to ten score mean?
It is a graded suspicion score per finding and per study, designed to be integrated alongside a radiologist BI-RADS assessment rather than treated as a positive or negative result.
Kareo: Does Kareo offer a free trial?
Kareo's website does not mention a free trial option. Access to pricing and trial arrangements requires contacting the sales team to request a demo.
SourceTherapixel: Does it cover anything besides mammography?
No. It is a mammography product only, including tomosynthesis. Other body regions need a different vendor.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Kareo vs DrChrono
- Kareo vs Athenahealth
- Kareo vs Epic Systems
- Kareo vs Cerner
- Kareo vs Amwell
- Kareo vs Practice Fusion
- Kareo vs NextGen Healthcare
- Kareo vs WebPT
- Kareo vs TherapyNotes
- Kareo vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Kareo vs ChiroTouch
- Kareo vs Liberty Software
- Kareo vs Lunit
- Kareo vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Kareo vs PioneerRx
- Kareo vs Rad AI
- Kareo vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Kareo vs Aidoc
- Kareo vs Gleamer
- Kareo vs Techcyte
- Kareo vs Paige
- Kareo vs PathAI
- Kareo vs Clue
- Kareo vs Rx30
- Kareo vs Annalise.ai
- Kareo vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Kareo vs Quantum Health
- Kareo vs Sysmex
- Kareo vs Epocrates
- Kareo vs Figure 1
- Kareo vs Fullscript
- Kareo vs GNU Health
- Kareo vs GoodRx
- Kareo vs Halaxy
- Therapixel vs DrChrono
- Therapixel vs Athenahealth
- Therapixel vs Epic Systems
- Therapixel vs Cerner
- Therapixel vs Amwell
- Therapixel vs Practice Fusion
- Therapixel vs NextGen Healthcare
- Therapixel vs WebPT
- Therapixel vs TherapyNotes
- Therapixel vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Therapixel vs ChiroTouch
- Therapixel vs Liberty Software
- Therapixel vs Lunit
- Therapixel vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Therapixel vs PioneerRx
- Therapixel vs Rad AI
- Therapixel vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Therapixel vs Aidoc
- Therapixel vs Gleamer
- Therapixel vs Techcyte
- Therapixel vs Paige
- Therapixel vs PathAI
- Therapixel vs Clue
- Therapixel vs Rx30
- Therapixel vs Annalise.ai
- Therapixel vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Therapixel vs Quantum Health
- Therapixel vs Sysmex
- Therapixel vs Epocrates
- Therapixel vs Figure 1
- Therapixel vs Fullscript
- Therapixel vs GNU Health
- Therapixel vs GoodRx
- Therapixel vs Halaxy

