Healthcare · head to head
Kareo vs Lunit

Lunit
Healthcare
FDA cleared and CE marked AI for mammography, tomosynthesis and chest radiography
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kareo kareo is now part of Tebra and sold under the Tebra brand rather than as a standalone product; Lunit the regulatory permission differs by product and by region, and INSIGHT Risk has been filed with the FDA but not cleared, so a buyer who reads a corporate press release rather than the specific clearance for their product and jurisdiction will plan a deployment they cannot legally run.
- They diverge on capability: Kareo covers Electronic Health Records, Lunit covers Lunit INSIGHT MMG.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kareo and Lunit actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kareo
- Electronic Health Records
- Scheduling
- Patient Portal
- Medical Billing
- Payment Processing
- Labs
- Pharmacies
- Clearinghouses
Only in Lunit
- Lunit INSIGHT MMG
- Lunit INSIGHT DBT
- Lunit INSIGHT CXR
- Volpara density assessment
- Volpara RiskPathways
- Volpara dose tracking
- PACS and mammography workstation integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kareo
- Practice management, scheduling and billing for independent medical practicesnot Lunit
- Electronic health records and e-prescribing for small clinicsnot Lunit
- Insurance claim submission and patient payment collectionnot Lunit
Lunit
- A national breast screening programme evaluating AI as a second reader to reduce double reading workload where two human readers are currently mandatednot Kareo
- A breast centre that moved to tomosynthesis and now has reading times it cannot staff, wanting detection support on DBT specificallynot Kareo
- An American breast imaging centre needing automated volumetric density assessment to meet patient density notification requirements, which is what Volpara is bought fornot Kareo
- A tuberculosis or lung screening programme in a high volume, radiologist scarce setting using chest radiography triage to prioritise filmsnot Kareo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kareo
- Kareo is now part of Tebra and sold under the Tebra brand rather than as a standalone product
- Tebra publishes no rate: pricing varies with provider count, features and implementation requirements and is quoted during a demo
- Billing counts clinical providers such as MDs, DOs, NPs and PAs, so adding a prescriber raises the bill even though non clinical staff are free
- Electronic prescribing of controlled substances setup costs about $75 per provider as a one time fee
- PDMP integration costs $500 one time per facility plus about $50 per user per year
Lunit
- The regulatory permission differs by product and by region, and INSIGHT Risk has been filed with the FDA but not cleared, so a buyer who reads a corporate press release rather than the specific clearance for their product and jurisdiction will plan a deployment they cannot legally run.
- Detection AI changes recall rates in screening, and the downstream cost of additional diagnostic workup lands on the programme rather than on the software budget, which is the cost most screening business cases omit.
- Performance is sensitive to the mammography vendor and acquisition protocol, so published results from a Hologic estate do not transfer to a GE or Siemens estate without local validation the buyer must fund.
- MMG, DBT and CXR are licensed separately and Volpara modules are separate again, so a breast centre wanting detection, density and risk pathways is assembling four line items rather than buying one product.
- Using AI as a replacement for one of two human readers is a workforce and liability decision that regulators and professional bodies treat differently in each country, so the saving that justifies the purchase may not be permitted where you operate.
Pricing, plan by plan
Kareo
$99/month- Starter$99/month
- EHR
- Scheduling
- Patient Portal
- Professional$199/month
- Everything in Starter
- Billing
- Reporting
Lunit
On request- Lunit INSIGHT$undefined/year
- Priced per study or per annual examination volume by product
- MMG, DBT and CXR licensed separately
- Volpara density and RiskPathways modules quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Kareo if
- You need electronic health records.
- You work on Web, Mobile.
- You also want scheduling.
Questions people ask
- Is Kareo or Lunit better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kareo starts at $99/month and Lunit at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kareo or Lunit?
- Kareo starts at $99/month and Lunit at On request.
- Does Kareo or Lunit run on more platforms?
- Kareo runs on Web, Mobile. Lunit runs on Web.
- What is Kareo best used for?
- Kareo is most often used for practice management, scheduling and billing for independent medical practices, electronic health records and e-prescribing for small clinics, insurance claim submission and patient payment collection. Of those, practice management, scheduling and billing for independent medical practices and electronic health records and e-prescribing for small clinics are not what Lunit is typically brought in for.
- What can Kareo do that Lunit cannot?
- Kareo covers Electronic Health Records, Scheduling, Patient Portal, Medical Billing. Lunit covers Lunit INSIGHT MMG, Lunit INSIGHT DBT, Lunit INSIGHT CXR, Volpara density assessment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kareo: Does Kareo publish its pricing?
No. Kareo (now rebranded as Tebra) uses custom per-practice pricing that varies based on the number of providers, features needed, and implementation requirements. Pricing is determined during a demo with the sales team.
SourceLunit: Is Lunit FDA cleared?
Yes for specific products. INSIGHT MMG, INSIGHT DBT and INSIGHT CXR Triage hold FDA 510(k) clearances. INSIGHT Risk, the five year risk prediction model, has been filed but was not cleared at the time of writing.
Kareo: Are there discounts for adding multiple modules?
Yes. Tebra states that many practices qualify for bundled pricing or volume incentives when adopting multiple modules like EHR, billing, and patient experience tools together.
SourceLunit: Can Lunit replace a second human reader in screening?
That depends entirely on your jurisdiction and professional body guidance, not on the software. The CE mark permits clinical use; it does not authorise a workforce model.
Kareo: What are the additional costs for controlled substance prescribing?
For providers who prescribe controlled substances, EPCS setup costs approximately $75 per provider as a one-time fee, and PDMP integration costs $500 one-time per facility plus around $50 per user per year.
SourceLunit: What did the Volpara acquisition add?
Volumetric breast density measurement, dose tracking and RiskPathways high risk programme management, which are the things American breast centres buy for density notification compliance rather than for detection.
Kareo: Does Kareo offer a free trial?
Kareo's website does not mention a free trial option. Access to pricing and trial arrangements requires contacting the sales team to request a demo.
SourceLunit: Is pricing published?
No. It is quoted per study or per annual volume, by product, with on premises and cloud priced differently.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Kareo vs DrChrono
- Kareo vs Athenahealth
- Kareo vs Epic Systems
- Kareo vs Cerner
- Kareo vs Amwell
- Kareo vs Practice Fusion
- Kareo vs NextGen Healthcare
- Kareo vs WebPT
- Kareo vs TherapyNotes
- Kareo vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Kareo vs ChiroTouch
- Kareo vs Liberty Software
- Kareo vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Kareo vs PioneerRx
- Kareo vs Rad AI
- Kareo vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Kareo vs Therapixel
- Kareo vs Aidoc
- Kareo vs Techcyte
- Kareo vs Gleamer
- Kareo vs PathAI
- Kareo vs Paige
- Kareo vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Kareo vs Annalise.ai
- Kareo vs Sysmex
- Kareo vs Sectra
- Kareo vs Lyra Health
- Kareo vs Visage Imaging
- Kareo vs Allscripts
- Kareo vs Clue
- Kareo vs Dentrix
- Kareo vs DHIS2
- Lunit vs DrChrono
- Lunit vs Athenahealth
- Lunit vs Epic Systems
- Lunit vs Cerner
- Lunit vs Amwell
- Lunit vs Practice Fusion
- Lunit vs NextGen Healthcare
- Lunit vs WebPT
- Lunit vs TherapyNotes
- Lunit vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Lunit vs ChiroTouch
- Lunit vs Liberty Software
- Lunit vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Lunit vs PioneerRx
- Lunit vs Rad AI
- Lunit vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Lunit vs Therapixel
- Lunit vs Aidoc
- Lunit vs Techcyte
- Lunit vs Gleamer
- Lunit vs PathAI
- Lunit vs Paige
- Lunit vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Lunit vs Annalise.ai
- Lunit vs Sysmex
- Lunit vs Sectra
- Lunit vs Lyra Health
- Lunit vs Visage Imaging
- Lunit vs Allscripts
- Lunit vs Clue
- Lunit vs Dentrix
- Lunit vs DHIS2

