Healthcare · head to head
Fullscript vs Therapixel

Fullscript
Healthcare
Supplement dispensing for practitioners, free to use because it earns on the products
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
Therapixel
Healthcare
French mammography AI with FDA clearances for 2D and tomosynthesis breast screening
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Fullscript has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Fullscript the practitioner sets their own margin on products they clinically recommend, which is a conflict of interest that some professional bodies and patients view badly, and the platform makes the arrangement easy rather than making it visible.; Therapixel european and American regulatory positions were established under different regimes, and under the EU Medical Device Regulation this class of diagnostic AI faces a higher classification and notified body scrutiny, so European buyers must verify the current MDR certificate and expiry rather than relying on a legacy CE reference.
- They diverge on capability: Fullscript covers Protocol dispensing, Therapixel covers MammoScreen 2D.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fullscript and Therapixel actually diverge.
| Attribute | Fullscript | Therapixel |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fullscript
- Protocol dispensing
- Profit dispensary
- Auto refill
- Lab ordering
- Patient app
- EHR integration
- Enterprise catalogue control
Only in Therapixel
- MammoScreen 2D
- MammoScreen DBT
- One to ten suspicion score
- Summary report
- Workstation and PACS delivery
- Reading workflow configurations
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fullscript
- A functional medicine practice that wants to stop holding supplement stock, cash and expiry risk in the clinicnot Therapixel
- A dietitian or naturopath adding a dispensary revenue stream without buying inventory upfrontnot Therapixel
- A clinic that needs patients to actually keep taking a protocol, where auto refills and dose reminders address the adherence problem directlynot Therapixel
- A multi site integrative health group that wants a single approved catalogue rather than each clinician choosing their own brandsnot Therapixel
Therapixel
- A European breast screening programme running mandatory double reading that wants to evaluate AI as a concurrent or second reader within what national guidance permitsnot Fullscript
- An American breast centre that has moved to tomosynthesis and needs reading support on DBT specifically, which Therapixel holds a clearance fornot Fullscript
- A screening service wanting a graded suspicion score rather than a binary flag so readers can calibrate their own thresholdnot Fullscript
- A radiology group evaluating multiple mammography AI vendors head to head on their own historic case set before committingnot Fullscript
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fullscript
- The practitioner sets their own margin on products they clinically recommend, which is a conflict of interest that some professional bodies and patients view badly, and the platform makes the arrangement easy rather than making it visible.
- The account is free but the practice does not control pricing, catalogue, shipping cost or the patient discount, so the entire economics of the dispensary can be changed by the vendor without the practice having any lever.
- Converting to a profit account requires personal identity verification, tax details and a bank account, and makes dispensary earnings the practitioner personal taxable income to report, which is administrative work no one warns about at signup.
- Product availability and shipping are geographically limited, so practices outside the supported countries cannot use it at all and cross border patients will find items unavailable at checkout.
- Patient refill schedules, plan history and a slice of practice revenue accumulate inside a platform the practice cannot export in a form another dispensary would accept, so switching later means asking every patient to re-enrol somewhere else.
Therapixel
- European and American regulatory positions were established under different regimes, and under the EU Medical Device Regulation this class of diagnostic AI faces a higher classification and notified body scrutiny, so European buyers must verify the current MDR certificate and expiry rather than relying on a legacy CE reference.
- MammoScreen does mammography only, so a hospital wanting AI across head CT, chest and breast needs several vendors and several PACS integrations, or an orchestration layer bought from someone else.
- Therapixel is a small French company competing against Hologic and iCAD, which have incumbency inside the mammography reading workstation, so integration into an American breast centre is more work than it is for the workstation vendor own AI.
- Detection performance is sensitive to the mammography unit vendor and acquisition protocol, so published results do not transfer between estates and each site needs local validation it must fund itself.
- Whether AI can substitute for one of two human readers is a national workforce and liability question, not a product capability, so the labour saving that justifies the purchase in one country is not permitted in another.
Pricing, plan by plan
Fullscript
Free- PractitionerFree
- Full catalogue and dispensing at no account fee
- Lab ordering and results
- Standard EHR integrations
- PatientFree
- No account fee
- Mobile app with dose reminders
- Auto refills, cancellable at any time
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Quoted for health systems and multi site groups
- Centrally managed catalogue with quality standards
- API level EHR integration
Therapixel
On request- MammoScreen$undefined/year
- Priced per examination or by annual screening volume
- 2D and tomosynthesis licensed by the versions cleared for each
- Cloud or on premises deployment quoted differently
Which should you pick?
Choose Fullscript if
- You need protocol dispensing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want profit dispensary.
Questions people ask
- Is Fullscript or Therapixel better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fullscript starts at Free and Therapixel at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fullscript or Therapixel?
- Fullscript has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Fullscript and On request for Therapixel.
- Does Fullscript or Therapixel run on more platforms?
- Fullscript runs on Web, iOS, Android. Therapixel runs on Web.
- Can I use Fullscript for free?
- Yes. Fullscript has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Therapixel starts at On request.
- What is Fullscript best used for?
- Fullscript is most often used for a functional medicine practice that wants to stop holding supplement stock, cash and expiry risk in the clinic, a dietitian or naturopath adding a dispensary revenue stream without buying inventory upfront, a clinic that needs patients to actually keep taking a protocol, where auto refills and dose reminders address the adherence problem directly, a multi site integrative health group that wants a single approved catalogue rather than each clinician choosing their own brands. Of those, a functional medicine practice that wants to stop holding supplement stock, cash and expiry risk in the clinic and a dietitian or naturopath adding a dispensary revenue stream without buying inventory upfront are not what Therapixel is typically brought in for.
- What can Fullscript do that Therapixel cannot?
- Fullscript covers Protocol dispensing, Profit dispensary, Auto refill, Lab ordering. Therapixel covers MammoScreen 2D, MammoScreen DBT, One to ten suspicion score, Summary report.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fullscript: Is Fullscript really free for practitioners?
Yes, the account has no fee. Fullscript earns on the supplements sold through it, and a practitioner on a profit account also earns a margin on those sales.
Therapixel: Is MammoScreen FDA cleared?
Yes. It holds 510(k) clearance K192854 for two dimensional mammography from July 2020, a November 2021 clearance for digital breast tomosynthesis, and two further clearances in October 2024 for later versions.
Fullscript: How do practitioners make money on it?
By converting to a profit dispensary and setting a margin. That requires tax information and a bank account, and the earnings are taxable income.
Therapixel: Is it CE marked?
Yes, but European buyers should ask specifically for the current certificate under the Medical Device Regulation and its expiry date, because this class of diagnostic AI moved to a higher classification under MDR.
Fullscript: What do patients pay?
No account fee, and a ten per cent discount on orders if the practitioner runs a no profit dispensary rather than taking a margin.
Therapixel: What does the one to ten score mean?
It is a graded suspicion score per finding and per study, designed to be integrated alongside a radiologist BI-RADS assessment rather than treated as a positive or negative result.
Fullscript: Is there an enterprise option?
Yes, quoted for health systems, adding central catalogue control, API EHR integration and cross site reporting.
Therapixel: Does it cover anything besides mammography?
No. It is a mammography product only, including tomosynthesis. Other body regions need a different vendor.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Fullscript vs Epic MyChart
- Fullscript vs Healthgrades
- Fullscript vs Techcyte
- Fullscript vs Jane App
- Fullscript vs Ambra Health
- Fullscript vs Lunit
- Fullscript vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Fullscript vs Doctor on Demand
- Fullscript vs DHIS2
- Fullscript vs OpenClinica
- Fullscript vs Paige
- Fullscript vs Beckman Coulter DxONE
- Fullscript vs Tebra
- Fullscript vs TheraNest
- Fullscript vs Updox
- Fullscript vs UpToDate
- Fullscript vs Woebot Health
- Fullscript vs Zanda Health
- Fullscript vs Aidoc
- Fullscript vs Gleamer
- Fullscript vs PathAI
- Fullscript vs Clue
- Fullscript vs Rx30
- Fullscript vs Annalise.ai
- Fullscript vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Fullscript vs Quantum Health
- Fullscript vs Sysmex
- Fullscript vs Epocrates
- Fullscript vs Figure 1
- Fullscript vs GNU Health
- Fullscript vs GoodRx
- Fullscript vs Halaxy
- Therapixel vs Epic MyChart
- Therapixel vs Healthgrades
- Therapixel vs Techcyte
- Therapixel vs Jane App
- Therapixel vs Ambra Health
- Therapixel vs Lunit
- Therapixel vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Therapixel vs Doctor on Demand
- Therapixel vs DHIS2
- Therapixel vs OpenClinica
- Therapixel vs Paige
- Therapixel vs Beckman Coulter DxONE
- Therapixel vs Tebra
- Therapixel vs TheraNest
- Therapixel vs Updox
- Therapixel vs UpToDate
- Therapixel vs Woebot Health
- Therapixel vs Zanda Health
- Therapixel vs Aidoc
- Therapixel vs Gleamer
- Therapixel vs PathAI
- Therapixel vs Clue
- Therapixel vs Rx30
- Therapixel vs Annalise.ai
- Therapixel vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Therapixel vs Quantum Health
- Therapixel vs Sysmex
- Therapixel vs Epocrates
- Therapixel vs Figure 1
- Therapixel vs GNU Health
- Therapixel vs GoodRx
- Therapixel vs Halaxy
