Softwr

Healthcare · head to head

Therapixel vs WebPT

Therapixel logo

Therapixel

Healthcare

French mammography AI with FDA clearances for 2D and tomosynthesis breast screening

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
WebPT logo

WebPT

Healthcare

EHR and practice management for physical therapy

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Therapixel european and American regulatory positions were established under different regimes, and under the EU Medical Device Regulation this class of diagnostic AI faces a higher classification and notified body scrutiny, so European buyers must verify the current MDR certificate and expiry rather than relying on a legacy CE reference.; WebPT no rate published on pricing page; vendor requires demo booking or sales contact for quotes
  • They diverge on capability: Therapixel covers MammoScreen 2D, WebPT covers Electronic Health Records.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Therapixel and WebPT actually diverge.

Attributes where Therapixel and WebPT differ
AttributeTherapixelWebPT
Pricing modelquotesubscription
PlatformsWebCloud-based SaaS
FoundedUnknown2005

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Therapixel

  • MammoScreen 2D
  • MammoScreen DBT
  • One to ten suspicion score
  • Summary report
  • Workstation and PACS delivery
  • Reading workflow configurations

Only in WebPT

  • Electronic Health Records
  • Scheduling
  • Documentation
  • Patient Portal
  • Analytics
  • Billing
  • Insurance
  • PECOS

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Therapixel

  • A European breast screening programme running mandatory double reading that wants to evaluate AI as a concurrent or second reader within what national guidance permitsnot WebPT
  • An American breast centre that has moved to tomosynthesis and needs reading support on DBT specifically, which Therapixel holds a clearance fornot WebPT
  • A screening service wanting a graded suspicion score rather than a binary flag so readers can calibrate their own thresholdnot WebPT
  • A radiology group evaluating multiple mammography AI vendors head to head on their own historic case set before committingnot WebPT

WebPT

  • Multi-location physical therapy practices needing comprehensive billing automation and insurance processingnot Therapixel
  • Rehabilitation therapy clinics requiring integrated AI-powered clinical documentationnot Therapixel

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Therapixel

  • European and American regulatory positions were established under different regimes, and under the EU Medical Device Regulation this class of diagnostic AI faces a higher classification and notified body scrutiny, so European buyers must verify the current MDR certificate and expiry rather than relying on a legacy CE reference.
  • MammoScreen does mammography only, so a hospital wanting AI across head CT, chest and breast needs several vendors and several PACS integrations, or an orchestration layer bought from someone else.
  • Therapixel is a small French company competing against Hologic and iCAD, which have incumbency inside the mammography reading workstation, so integration into an American breast centre is more work than it is for the workstation vendor own AI.
  • Detection performance is sensitive to the mammography unit vendor and acquisition protocol, so published results do not transfer between estates and each site needs local validation it must fund itself.
  • Whether AI can substitute for one of two human readers is a national workforce and liability question, not a product capability, so the labour saving that justifies the purchase in one country is not permitted in another.

WebPT

  • No rate published on pricing page; vendor requires demo booking or sales contact for quotes
  • Specific pricing amounts not disclosed despite three pricing tiers being described

Pricing, plan by plan

Therapixel

On request
  • MammoScreen$undefined/year
    • Priced per examination or by annual screening volume
    • 2D and tomosynthesis licensed by the versions cleared for each
    • Cloud or on premises deployment quoted differently

WebPT

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the WebPT review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Therapixel if

  • You need mammoscreen 2d.
  • You also want mammoscreen dbt.
Therapixel review

Choose WebPT if

  • You need electronic health records.
  • You work on Cloud-based SaaS.
  • You also want scheduling.
WebPT review

Questions people ask

Is Therapixel or WebPT better?
Neither clearly leads. Therapixel starts at On request and WebPT at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Therapixel or WebPT?
Therapixel starts at On request and WebPT at On request.
Does Therapixel or WebPT run on more platforms?
Therapixel runs on Web. WebPT runs on Cloud-based SaaS.
What is Therapixel best used for?
Therapixel is most often used for a european breast screening programme running mandatory double reading that wants to evaluate ai as a concurrent or second reader within what national guidance permits, an american breast centre that has moved to tomosynthesis and needs reading support on dbt specifically, which therapixel holds a clearance for, a screening service wanting a graded suspicion score rather than a binary flag so readers can calibrate their own threshold, a radiology group evaluating multiple mammography ai vendors head to head on their own historic case set before committing. Of those, a european breast screening programme running mandatory double reading that wants to evaluate ai as a concurrent or second reader within what national guidance permits and an american breast centre that has moved to tomosynthesis and needs reading support on dbt specifically, which therapixel holds a clearance for are not what WebPT is typically brought in for.
What can Therapixel do that WebPT cannot?
Therapixel covers MammoScreen 2D, MammoScreen DBT, One to ten suspicion score, Summary report. WebPT covers Electronic Health Records, Scheduling, Documentation, Patient Portal.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Therapixel: Is MammoScreen FDA cleared?

Yes. It holds 510(k) clearance K192854 for two dimensional mammography from July 2020, a November 2021 clearance for digital breast tomosynthesis, and two further clearances in October 2024 for later versions.

WebPT: How much does WebPT cost?

WebPT pricing is customized based on your selected plan (Starter, Enhanced, or Ultimate) and any customizations your practice needs. Organizations must book a demo or contact sales to receive personalized pricing.

Source
Therapixel: Is it CE marked?

Yes, but European buyers should ask specifically for the current certificate under the Medical Device Regulation and its expiry date, because this class of diagnostic AI moved to a higher classification under MDR.

WebPT: What are the three WebPT pricing tiers?

WebPT offers Starter for small cash-pay practices, Enhanced for growing practices that accept insurance and need billing, and Ultimate for larger practices requiring customization and advanced reporting.

Source
Therapixel: What does the one to ten score mean?

It is a graded suspicion score per finding and per study, designed to be integrated alongside a radiologist BI-RADS assessment rather than treated as a positive or negative result.

Therapixel: Does it cover anything besides mammography?

No. It is a mammography product only, including tomosynthesis. Other body regions need a different vendor.

Share

Related pages

More on Therapixel

More on WebPT

Keep looking

Other head to heads