Healthcare · head to head
Gleamer vs Kareo

Gleamer
Healthcare
CE marked and FDA cleared imaging AI suite for bone trauma and chest, now owned by RadNet
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Gleamer radNet, an imaging provider that competes with many independent Gleamer customers, now owns the company and also owns the competing DeepHealth AI portfolio, so roadmap and pricing priorities are an open question for non-RadNet buyers.; Kareo kareo is now part of Tebra and sold under the Tebra brand rather than as a standalone product
- They diverge on capability: Gleamer covers BoneView, Kareo covers Electronic Health Records.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Gleamer and Kareo actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Gleamer
- BoneView
- ChestView
- BoneAge
- BoneMetrics
- LungCT and BoneCT
- BreastView
- Pixyl.Neuro
- Gleamer Copilot
Only in Kareo
- Electronic Health Records
- Scheduling
- Patient Portal
- Medical Billing
- Payment Processing
- Labs
- Pharmacies
- Clearinghouses
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Gleamer
- An emergency department where junior doctors read plain films before radiology review and missed fractures are a recurring incident themenot Kareo
- An urgent care network standardising musculoskeletal reading quality across sites with variable radiology covernot Kareo
- A paediatric service automating bone age assessment to remove a slow manual atlas comparisonnot Kareo
- An orthopaedic service that needs automated limb alignment and measurement before surgical planning rather than manual measurement on the workstationnot Kareo
Kareo
- Practice management, scheduling and billing for independent medical practicesnot Gleamer
- Electronic health records and e-prescribing for small clinicsnot Gleamer
- Insurance claim submission and patient payment collectionnot Gleamer
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Gleamer
- RadNet, an imaging provider that competes with many independent Gleamer customers, now owns the company and also owns the competing DeepHealth AI portfolio, so roadmap and pricing priorities are an open question for non-RadNet buyers.
- The measured benefit is largest for less experienced readers, so a specialist musculoskeletal service will see far less improvement than the published reader studies suggest.
- Cleared indications differ per module and per market, and the FDA cleared set is narrower than the CE marked European set, so an American buyer cannot rely on European reference sites.
- Each additional module adds alert volume into the same worklist, and departments running several Gleamer algorithms report needing local threshold tuning to keep radiologist trust.
- Pricing is per exam and not published, which makes budgeting difficult for an emergency department whose plain film volume swings seasonally.
Kareo
- Kareo is now part of Tebra and sold under the Tebra brand rather than as a standalone product
- Tebra publishes no rate: pricing varies with provider count, features and implementation requirements and is quoted during a demo
- Billing counts clinical providers such as MDs, DOs, NPs and PAs, so adding a prescriber raises the bill even though non clinical staff are free
- Electronic prescribing of controlled substances setup costs about $75 per provider as a one time fee
- PDMP integration costs $500 one time per facility plus about $50 per user per year
Pricing, plan by plan
Gleamer
On request- Gleamer Copilot$undefined/year
- Priced per exam analysed or as an annual volume subscription
- Modules licensed individually or bundled as Copilot
- Cleared and CE marked indication differs per module and per market
Kareo
$99/month- Starter$99/month
- EHR
- Scheduling
- Patient Portal
- Professional$199/month
- Everything in Starter
- Billing
- Reporting
Which should you pick?
Choose Gleamer if
- You need boneview.
- You work on Web, Cloud, On-premise.
- You also want chestview.
Choose Kareo if
- You need electronic health records.
- You work on Web, Mobile.
- You also want scheduling.
Questions people ask
- Is Gleamer or Kareo better?
- Neither clearly leads. Gleamer starts at On request and Kareo at $99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Gleamer or Kareo?
- Gleamer starts at On request and Kareo at $99/month.
- Does Gleamer or Kareo run on more platforms?
- Gleamer runs on Web, Cloud, On-premise. Kareo runs on Web, Mobile.
- What is Gleamer best used for?
- Gleamer is most often used for an emergency department where junior doctors read plain films before radiology review and missed fractures are a recurring incident theme, an urgent care network standardising musculoskeletal reading quality across sites with variable radiology cover, a paediatric service automating bone age assessment to remove a slow manual atlas comparison, an orthopaedic service that needs automated limb alignment and measurement before surgical planning rather than manual measurement on the workstation. Of those, an emergency department where junior doctors read plain films before radiology review and missed fractures are a recurring incident theme and an urgent care network standardising musculoskeletal reading quality across sites with variable radiology cover are not what Kareo is typically brought in for.
- What can Gleamer do that Kareo cannot?
- Gleamer covers BoneView, ChestView, BoneAge, BoneMetrics. Kareo covers Electronic Health Records, Scheduling, Patient Portal, Medical Billing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Gleamer: Who owns Gleamer?
RadNet agreed to acquire Gleamer in February 2026 for around two hundred and fifteen million euros upfront. RadNet also owns DeepHealth, a competing AI portfolio.
Kareo: Does Kareo publish its pricing?
No. Kareo (now rebranded as Tebra) uses custom per-practice pricing that varies based on the number of providers, features needed, and implementation requirements. Pricing is determined during a demo with the sales team.
SourceGleamer: Is BoneView FDA cleared?
Yes, BoneView holds 510(k) clearance including for paediatric fracture detection, but the cleared finding set is narrower than the CE marked indication in Europe.
Kareo: Are there discounts for adding multiple modules?
Yes. Tebra states that many practices qualify for bundled pricing or volume incentives when adopting multiple modules like EHR, billing, and patient experience tools together.
SourceGleamer: What does the evidence actually show?
Multi-reader studies reported improved reader sensitivity for fracture detection and fewer false negatives, with the gain concentrated among less experienced readers in emergency settings.
Kareo: What are the additional costs for controlled substance prescribing?
For providers who prescribe controlled substances, EPCS setup costs approximately $75 per provider as a one-time fee, and PDMP integration costs $500 one-time per facility plus around $50 per user per year.
SourceGleamer: Can I buy just BoneView?
Yes, modules are licensed individually, though the commercial pitch is now the Copilot bundle across modalities.
Kareo: Does Kareo offer a free trial?
Kareo's website does not mention a free trial option. Access to pricing and trial arrangements requires contacting the sales team to request a demo.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Gleamer vs Annalise.ai
- Gleamer vs Sectra
- Gleamer vs Rad AI
- Gleamer vs Lunit
- Gleamer vs Techcyte
- Gleamer vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Gleamer vs Visage Imaging
- Gleamer vs Paige
- Gleamer vs Therapixel
- Gleamer vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Gleamer vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Gleamer vs Hinge Health
- Gleamer vs Meru Health
- Gleamer vs NextGen Healthcare
- Gleamer vs Nookal
- Gleamer vs Open Dental
- Gleamer vs Oracle Clinical One
- Gleamer vs Phreesia
- Gleamer vs DrChrono
- Gleamer vs Athenahealth
- Gleamer vs Epic Systems
- Gleamer vs Cerner
- Gleamer vs Amwell
- Gleamer vs Practice Fusion
- Gleamer vs WebPT
- Gleamer vs TherapyNotes
- Gleamer vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Gleamer vs ChiroTouch
- Gleamer vs Liberty Software
- Gleamer vs PioneerRx
- Gleamer vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Kareo vs Annalise.ai
- Kareo vs Sectra
- Kareo vs Rad AI
- Kareo vs Lunit
- Kareo vs Techcyte
- Kareo vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Kareo vs Visage Imaging
- Kareo vs Paige
- Kareo vs Therapixel
- Kareo vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Kareo vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Kareo vs Hinge Health
- Kareo vs Meru Health
- Kareo vs NextGen Healthcare
- Kareo vs Nookal
- Kareo vs Open Dental
- Kareo vs Oracle Clinical One
- Kareo vs Phreesia
- Kareo vs DrChrono
- Kareo vs Athenahealth
- Kareo vs Epic Systems
- Kareo vs Cerner
- Kareo vs Amwell
- Kareo vs Practice Fusion
- Kareo vs WebPT
- Kareo vs TherapyNotes
- Kareo vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Kareo vs ChiroTouch
- Kareo vs Liberty Software
- Kareo vs PioneerRx
- Kareo vs Allscripts TouchWorks

