Healthcare · head to head
Kareo vs Paige

Paige
Healthcare
Digital pathology AI holding the first FDA De Novo authorisation for a pathology algorithm, now part of Tempus
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kareo kareo is now part of Tebra and sold under the Tebra brand rather than as a standalone product; Paige the FDA authorisation is confined to prostate core needle biopsies, on compatible scanners, viewed through FullFocus, as an adjunct only; every other tissue type and every grading claim is outside that authorisation in the United States.
- They diverge on capability: Kareo covers Electronic Health Records, Paige covers Paige Prostate Detect.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kareo and Paige actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kareo
- Electronic Health Records
- Scheduling
- Patient Portal
- Medical Billing
- Payment Processing
- Labs
- Pharmacies
- Clearinghouses
Only in Paige
- Paige Prostate Detect
- Paige Prostate Grade and Quantify
- Perineural invasion detection
- Breast and lymph node applications
- FullFocus viewer
- Foundation models
- OmniScreen
- Paige Alba
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kareo
- Practice management, scheduling and billing for independent medical practicesnot Paige
- Electronic health records and e-prescribing for small clinicsnot Paige
- Insurance claim submission and patient payment collectionnot Paige
Paige
- A reference laboratory processing high volumes of prostate core needle biopsies where a second read on every case is not staffablenot Kareo
- A pathology department already digitised that wants a documented safety net against missed small foci of cancernot Kareo
- A hospital laboratory struggling to recruit uropathology subspecialists and needing consistency across generalist reportingnot Kareo
- A pharmaceutical company needing consistent biomarker scoring across trial sites rather than site-by-site pathologist variabilitynot Kareo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kareo
- Kareo is now part of Tebra and sold under the Tebra brand rather than as a standalone product
- Tebra publishes no rate: pricing varies with provider count, features and implementation requirements and is quoted during a demo
- Billing counts clinical providers such as MDs, DOs, NPs and PAs, so adding a prescriber raises the bill even though non clinical staff are free
- Electronic prescribing of controlled substances setup costs about $75 per provider as a one time fee
- PDMP integration costs $500 one time per facility plus about $50 per user per year
Paige
- The FDA authorisation is confined to prostate core needle biopsies, on compatible scanners, viewed through FullFocus, as an adjunct only; every other tissue type and every grading claim is outside that authorisation in the United States.
- The algorithm is worthless without a digital pathology programme already running, and slide scanning, storage and workflow typically cost far more than the software licence.
- Tempus acquired Paige in 2025, so the roadmap now competes for attention inside a genomics-led business, and the pathology-only buyer is no longer the primary customer.
- Scanner compatibility is a hard constraint rather than a preference, and a laboratory with an unsupported scanner fleet cannot use the authorised indication at all.
- Pricing is per case or per slide and unpublished, so a laboratory cannot model cost per reported case without entering a sales process.
Pricing, plan by plan
Kareo
$99/month- Starter$99/month
- EHR
- Scheduling
- Patient Portal
- Professional$199/month
- Everything in Starter
- Billing
- Reporting
Paige
On request- Paige clinical applications$undefined/year
- Priced per case or per slide analysed under annual agreement
- Prostate, breast and other applications licensed separately
- Requires compatible whole slide scanner and the FullFocus viewer for the authorised indication
Which should you pick?
Choose Kareo if
- You need electronic health records.
- You work on Web, Mobile.
- You also want scheduling.
Choose Paige if
- You need paige prostate detect.
- You work on Web, Cloud, On-premise.
- You also want paige prostate grade and quantify.
Questions people ask
- Is Kareo or Paige better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kareo starts at $99/month and Paige at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kareo or Paige?
- Kareo starts at $99/month and Paige at On request.
- Does Kareo or Paige run on more platforms?
- Kareo runs on Web, Mobile. Paige runs on Web, Cloud, On-premise.
- What is Kareo best used for?
- Kareo is most often used for practice management, scheduling and billing for independent medical practices, electronic health records and e-prescribing for small clinics, insurance claim submission and patient payment collection. Of those, practice management, scheduling and billing for independent medical practices and electronic health records and e-prescribing for small clinics are not what Paige is typically brought in for.
- What can Kareo do that Paige cannot?
- Kareo covers Electronic Health Records, Scheduling, Patient Portal, Medical Billing. Paige covers Paige Prostate Detect, Paige Prostate Grade and Quantify, Perineural invasion detection, Breast and lymph node applications.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kareo: Does Kareo publish its pricing?
No. Kareo (now rebranded as Tebra) uses custom per-practice pricing that varies based on the number of providers, features needed, and implementation requirements. Pricing is determined during a demo with the sales team.
SourcePaige: What exactly is FDA authorised?
Paige Prostate Detect, as an adjunct for identifying areas of interest on digitised prostate core needle biopsy slides, viewed through the Paige FullFocus viewer on a compatible scanner. Nothing else in the portfolio holds that authorisation in the United States.
Kareo: Are there discounts for adding multiple modules?
Yes. Tebra states that many practices qualify for bundled pricing or volume incentives when adopting multiple modules like EHR, billing, and patient experience tools together.
SourcePaige: Is the European position broader?
Yes. The Paige Prostate suite including grading and quantification received IVDR certification in 2025, which covers more than the United States authorisation.
Kareo: What are the additional costs for controlled substance prescribing?
For providers who prescribe controlled substances, EPCS setup costs approximately $75 per provider as a one-time fee, and PDMP integration costs $500 one-time per facility plus around $50 per user per year.
SourcePaige: What did the pivotal study measure?
Pathologist cancer detection on individual slide images improved, with reported reductions in false negative and false positive readings. It measured pathologist performance with the tool, not standalone algorithm accuracy.
Kareo: Does Kareo offer a free trial?
Kareo's website does not mention a free trial option. Access to pricing and trial arrangements requires contacting the sales team to request a demo.
SourcePaige: Who owns Paige now?
Tempus AI acquired Paige in 2025. Products remain branded Paige.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Kareo vs DrChrono
- Kareo vs Athenahealth
- Kareo vs Epic Systems
- Kareo vs Cerner
- Kareo vs Amwell
- Kareo vs Practice Fusion
- Kareo vs NextGen Healthcare
- Kareo vs WebPT
- Kareo vs TherapyNotes
- Kareo vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Kareo vs ChiroTouch
- Kareo vs Liberty Software
- Kareo vs Lunit
- Kareo vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Kareo vs PioneerRx
- Kareo vs Rad AI
- Kareo vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Kareo vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Kareo vs Sectra
- Kareo vs PathAI
- Kareo vs Techcyte
- Kareo vs Gleamer
- Kareo vs Annalise.ai
- Kareo vs Therapixel
- Kareo vs Aidoc
- Kareo vs Koa Health
- Kareo vs Ambra Health
- Kareo vs DHIS2
- Kareo vs NextGen Enterprise EHR
- Kareo vs Omada Health
- Kareo vs OpenClinica
- Kareo vs Kareo Clinical
- Paige vs DrChrono
- Paige vs Athenahealth
- Paige vs Epic Systems
- Paige vs Cerner
- Paige vs Amwell
- Paige vs Practice Fusion
- Paige vs NextGen Healthcare
- Paige vs WebPT
- Paige vs TherapyNotes
- Paige vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Paige vs ChiroTouch
- Paige vs Liberty Software
- Paige vs Lunit
- Paige vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Paige vs PioneerRx
- Paige vs Rad AI
- Paige vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Paige vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Paige vs Sectra
- Paige vs PathAI
- Paige vs Techcyte
- Paige vs Gleamer
- Paige vs Annalise.ai
- Paige vs Therapixel
- Paige vs Aidoc
- Paige vs Koa Health
- Paige vs Ambra Health
- Paige vs DHIS2
- Paige vs NextGen Enterprise EHR
- Paige vs Omada Health
- Paige vs OpenClinica
- Paige vs Kareo Clinical

