Healthcare · head to head
Epic Systems vs Therapixel

Epic Systems
Healthcare
Leading electronic health records system for healthcare organizations
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
Therapixel
Healthcare
French mammography AI with FDA clearances for 2D and tomosynthesis breast screening
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Epic Systems no free version or trial; enterprise pricing only with custom negotiation required; Therapixel european and American regulatory positions were established under different regimes, and under the EU Medical Device Regulation this class of diagnostic AI faces a higher classification and notified body scrutiny, so European buyers must verify the current MDR certificate and expiry rather than relying on a legacy CE reference.
- They diverge on capability: Epic Systems covers Electronic Health Records, Therapixel covers MammoScreen 2D.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Epic Systems and Therapixel actually diverge.
| Attribute | Epic Systems | Therapixel |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Desktop, Mobile | Web |
| Founded | 1979 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Epic Systems
- Electronic Health Records
- Revenue Cycle Management
- Patient Portal
- Clinical Decision Support
- Population Health
- Lab Systems
- Imaging Systems
- Pharmacy Systems
Only in Therapixel
- MammoScreen 2D
- MammoScreen DBT
- One to ten suspicion score
- Summary report
- Workstation and PACS delivery
- Reading workflow configurations
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Epic Systems
- Patient Carenot Therapixel
- Medical Recordsnot Therapixel
- Practice Managementnot Therapixel
- Telehealthnot Therapixel
Therapixel
- A European breast screening programme running mandatory double reading that wants to evaluate AI as a concurrent or second reader within what national guidance permitsnot Epic Systems
- An American breast centre that has moved to tomosynthesis and needs reading support on DBT specifically, which Therapixel holds a clearance fornot Epic Systems
- A screening service wanting a graded suspicion score rather than a binary flag so readers can calibrate their own thresholdnot Epic Systems
- A radiology group evaluating multiple mammography AI vendors head to head on their own historic case set before committingnot Epic Systems
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Epic Systems
- No free version or trial; enterprise pricing only with custom negotiation required
- Lengthy implementation timeline: 12-24 months for single hospitals, 3-5 years for multi-system rollouts
- Customization and workflow adaptation requires extensive consulting services
- Very high licensing costs ranging from 100,000 to 30 million USD depending on organization size
Therapixel
- European and American regulatory positions were established under different regimes, and under the EU Medical Device Regulation this class of diagnostic AI faces a higher classification and notified body scrutiny, so European buyers must verify the current MDR certificate and expiry rather than relying on a legacy CE reference.
- MammoScreen does mammography only, so a hospital wanting AI across head CT, chest and breast needs several vendors and several PACS integrations, or an orchestration layer bought from someone else.
- Therapixel is a small French company competing against Hologic and iCAD, which have incumbency inside the mammography reading workstation, so integration into an American breast centre is more work than it is for the workstation vendor own AI.
- Detection performance is sensitive to the mammography unit vendor and acquisition protocol, so published results do not transfer between estates and each site needs local validation it must fund itself.
- Whether AI can substitute for one of two human readers is a national workforce and liability question, not a product capability, so the labour saving that justifies the purchase in one country is not permitted in another.
Pricing, plan by plan
Epic Systems
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Epic Systems review.
Therapixel
On request- MammoScreen$undefined/year
- Priced per examination or by annual screening volume
- 2D and tomosynthesis licensed by the versions cleared for each
- Cloud or on premises deployment quoted differently
Which should you pick?
Choose Epic Systems if
- You need electronic health records.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Mobile.
- You also want revenue cycle management.
Questions people ask
- Is Epic Systems or Therapixel better?
- Neither clearly leads. Epic Systems starts at On request and Therapixel at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Epic Systems or Therapixel?
- Epic Systems starts at On request and Therapixel at On request.
- Does Epic Systems or Therapixel run on more platforms?
- Epic Systems runs on Web, Desktop, Mobile. Therapixel runs on Web.
- What is Epic Systems best used for?
- Epic Systems is most often used for patient care, medical records, practice management, telehealth. Of those, patient care and medical records are not what Therapixel is typically brought in for.
- What can Epic Systems do that Therapixel cannot?
- Epic Systems covers Electronic Health Records, Revenue Cycle Management, Patient Portal, Clinical Decision Support. Therapixel covers MammoScreen 2D, MammoScreen DBT, One to ten suspicion score, Summary report.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Epic Systems: What is Epic's market position?
Epic holds 36 percent of the U.S. EHR market and manages over 280 million patient records across 1,200+ healthcare organizations. Among hospitals with over 300 beds, Epic has 52 percent market share, and 71 percent market share in major academic medical centers as of 2026.
SourceTherapixel: Is MammoScreen FDA cleared?
Yes. It holds 510(k) clearance K192854 for two dimensional mammography from July 2020, a November 2021 clearance for digital breast tomosynthesis, and two further clearances in October 2024 for later versions.
Epic Systems: Is there a free trial or demo available?
Epic does not offer a free version or trial. The software is enterprise-only with custom pricing negotiated directly with organizations. Typical implementation timelines for single hospitals range from 12 to 24 months, and multi-hospital systems can take 3 to 5 years for phased rollouts.
SourceTherapixel: Is it CE marked?
Yes, but European buyers should ask specifically for the current certificate under the Medical Device Regulation and its expiry date, because this class of diagnostic AI moved to a higher classification under MDR.
Epic Systems: How does Epic integrate with third-party systems?
Epic provides multiple integration pathways: FHIR R4 APIs, HL7 v2 messaging, CCDA document exchange, and proprietary APIs through Epic Showroom (formerly App Orchard). Over 1,000 certified apps are available in the marketplace, enabling real-time data synchronization and interoperability.
SourceTherapixel: What does the one to ten score mean?
It is a graded suspicion score per finding and per study, designed to be integrated alongside a radiologist BI-RADS assessment rather than treated as a positive or negative result.
Epic Systems: What is included in Epic's unified platform?
Epic provides a truly unified system spanning inpatient, outpatient, emergency department, surgical, pharmacy, laboratory, radiology, billing, and population health on a single database. It includes appointment scheduling, medical billing, clinical decision support, patient portal (MyChart), telehealth capabilities, and analytics.
SourceTherapixel: Does it cover anything besides mammography?
No. It is a mammography product only, including tomosynthesis. Other body regions need a different vendor.
Related pages
More on Epic Systems
Other head to heads
- Epic Systems vs Cerner
- Epic Systems vs NextGen Enterprise EHR
- Epic Systems vs Meditech
- Epic Systems vs Allscripts
- Epic Systems vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Epic Systems vs eClinicalWorks
- Epic Systems vs Athenahealth
- Epic Systems vs Dentrix
- Epic Systems vs ChiroTouch
- Epic Systems vs Ambra Health
- Epic Systems vs BestRx
- Epic Systems vs DrChrono
- Epic Systems vs Liberty Software
- Epic Systems vs Lunit
- Epic Systems vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Epic Systems vs Cerner PowerChart
- Epic Systems vs NextGen Healthcare
- Epic Systems vs athenaOne
- Epic Systems vs Aidoc
- Epic Systems vs Gleamer
- Epic Systems vs Techcyte
- Epic Systems vs Paige
- Epic Systems vs PathAI
- Epic Systems vs Clue
- Epic Systems vs Rx30
- Epic Systems vs Annalise.ai
- Epic Systems vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Epic Systems vs Quantum Health
- Epic Systems vs Sysmex
- Epic Systems vs Epocrates
- Epic Systems vs Figure 1
- Epic Systems vs Fullscript
- Epic Systems vs GNU Health
- Epic Systems vs GoodRx
- Epic Systems vs Halaxy
- Therapixel vs Cerner
- Therapixel vs NextGen Enterprise EHR
- Therapixel vs Meditech
- Therapixel vs Allscripts
- Therapixel vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Therapixel vs eClinicalWorks
- Therapixel vs Athenahealth
- Therapixel vs Dentrix
- Therapixel vs ChiroTouch
- Therapixel vs Ambra Health
- Therapixel vs BestRx
- Therapixel vs DrChrono
- Therapixel vs Liberty Software
- Therapixel vs Lunit
- Therapixel vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Therapixel vs Cerner PowerChart
- Therapixel vs NextGen Healthcare
- Therapixel vs athenaOne
- Therapixel vs Aidoc
- Therapixel vs Gleamer
- Therapixel vs Techcyte
- Therapixel vs Paige
- Therapixel vs PathAI
- Therapixel vs Clue
- Therapixel vs Rx30
- Therapixel vs Annalise.ai
- Therapixel vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Therapixel vs Quantum Health
- Therapixel vs Sysmex
- Therapixel vs Epocrates
- Therapixel vs Figure 1
- Therapixel vs Fullscript
- Therapixel vs GNU Health
- Therapixel vs GoodRx
- Therapixel vs Halaxy
