Healthcare · head to head
Practice Fusion vs Therapixel
Therapixel
Healthcare
French mammography AI with FDA clearances for 2D and tomosynthesis breast screening
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Practice Fusion has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Practice Fusion cloud-based architecture requires constant internet connectivity; Therapixel european and American regulatory positions were established under different regimes, and under the EU Medical Device Regulation this class of diagnostic AI faces a higher classification and notified body scrutiny, so European buyers must verify the current MDR certificate and expiry rather than relying on a legacy CE reference.
- They diverge on capability: Practice Fusion covers Electronic Health Records, Therapixel covers MammoScreen 2D.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Practice Fusion and Therapixel actually diverge.
| Attribute | Practice Fusion | Therapixel |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
| Founded | 2005 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Practice Fusion
- Electronic Health Records
- e-Prescribing
- Lab Orders
- Patient Portal
- Scheduling
- Labs
- Pharmacies
- Imaging Centers
Only in Therapixel
- MammoScreen 2D
- MammoScreen DBT
- One to ten suspicion score
- Summary report
- Workstation and PACS delivery
- Reading workflow configurations
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Practice Fusion
- Small to medium medical practicesnot Therapixel
- Primary care clinicsnot Therapixel
- Independent clinicians needing electronic chartingnot Therapixel
- Practice management and billing workflowsnot Therapixel
Therapixel
- A European breast screening programme running mandatory double reading that wants to evaluate AI as a concurrent or second reader within what national guidance permitsnot Practice Fusion
- An American breast centre that has moved to tomosynthesis and needs reading support on DBT specifically, which Therapixel holds a clearance fornot Practice Fusion
- A screening service wanting a graded suspicion score rather than a binary flag so readers can calibrate their own thresholdnot Practice Fusion
- A radiology group evaluating multiple mammography AI vendors head to head on their own historic case set before committingnot Practice Fusion
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Practice Fusion
- Cloud-based architecture requires constant internet connectivity
- Requires annual commitment for pricing
Therapixel
- European and American regulatory positions were established under different regimes, and under the EU Medical Device Regulation this class of diagnostic AI faces a higher classification and notified body scrutiny, so European buyers must verify the current MDR certificate and expiry rather than relying on a legacy CE reference.
- MammoScreen does mammography only, so a hospital wanting AI across head CT, chest and breast needs several vendors and several PACS integrations, or an orchestration layer bought from someone else.
- Therapixel is a small French company competing against Hologic and iCAD, which have incumbency inside the mammography reading workstation, so integration into an American breast centre is more work than it is for the workstation vendor own AI.
- Detection performance is sensitive to the mammography unit vendor and acquisition protocol, so published results do not transfer between estates and each site needs local validation it must fund itself.
- Whether AI can substitute for one of two human readers is a national workforce and liability question, not a product capability, so the labour saving that justifies the purchase in one country is not permitted in another.
Pricing, plan by plan
Practice Fusion
Free- Standard$199/month
- Provider license with e-prescribing and chart signing
- 3 signing staff licenses included
- Unlimited non-signing staff licenses
Therapixel
On request- MammoScreen$undefined/year
- Priced per examination or by annual screening volume
- 2D and tomosynthesis licensed by the versions cleared for each
- Cloud or on premises deployment quoted differently
Which should you pick?
Choose Practice Fusion if
- You need electronic health records.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want e-prescribing.
Questions people ask
- Is Practice Fusion or Therapixel better?
- Neither clearly leads. Practice Fusion starts at Free and Therapixel at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Practice Fusion or Therapixel?
- Practice Fusion has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Practice Fusion and On request for Therapixel.
- Does Practice Fusion or Therapixel run on more platforms?
- Practice Fusion runs on Web, iOS, Android. Therapixel runs on Web.
- Can I use Practice Fusion for free?
- Yes. Practice Fusion has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Therapixel starts at On request.
- What is Practice Fusion best used for?
- Practice Fusion is most often used for small to medium medical practices, primary care clinics, independent clinicians needing electronic charting, practice management and billing workflows. Of those, small to medium medical practices and primary care clinics are not what Therapixel is typically brought in for.
- What can Practice Fusion do that Therapixel cannot?
- Practice Fusion covers Electronic Health Records, e-Prescribing, Lab Orders, Patient Portal. Therapixel covers MammoScreen 2D, MammoScreen DBT, One to ten suspicion score, Summary report.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Practice Fusion: How much does Practice Fusion cost?
Practice Fusion starts at $199 per month per provider with an annual commitment required. The pricing includes 3 signing staff licenses and unlimited non-signing staff licenses.
SourceTherapixel: Is MammoScreen FDA cleared?
Yes. It holds 510(k) clearance K192854 for two dimensional mammography from July 2020, a November 2021 clearance for digital breast tomosynthesis, and two further clearances in October 2024 for later versions.
Practice Fusion: Does Practice Fusion offer a free trial?
Yes, Practice Fusion offers a complimentary 2-week trial with no commitment, no upfront costs, and no credit card required.
SourceTherapixel: Is it CE marked?
Yes, but European buyers should ask specifically for the current certificate under the Medical Device Regulation and its expiry date, because this class of diagnostic AI moved to a higher classification under MDR.
Therapixel: What does the one to ten score mean?
It is a graded suspicion score per finding and per study, designed to be integrated alongside a radiologist BI-RADS assessment rather than treated as a positive or negative result.
Therapixel: Does it cover anything besides mammography?
No. It is a mammography product only, including tomosynthesis. Other body regions need a different vendor.
Related pages
More on Practice Fusion
Other head to heads
- Practice Fusion vs Athenahealth
- Practice Fusion vs Epic Systems
- Practice Fusion vs Cerner
- Practice Fusion vs Amwell
- Practice Fusion vs DrChrono
- Practice Fusion vs Kareo Clinical
- Practice Fusion vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Practice Fusion vs ChiroTouch
- Practice Fusion vs NextGen Healthcare
- Practice Fusion vs WebPT
- Practice Fusion vs eClinicalWorks
- Practice Fusion vs Healthie
- Practice Fusion vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Practice Fusion vs PioneerRx
- Practice Fusion vs Rad AI
- Practice Fusion vs Aidoc
- Practice Fusion vs Annalise.ai
- Practice Fusion vs Rx30
- Practice Fusion vs Lunit
- Practice Fusion vs Gleamer
- Practice Fusion vs Techcyte
- Practice Fusion vs Paige
- Practice Fusion vs PathAI
- Practice Fusion vs Clue
- Practice Fusion vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Practice Fusion vs Quantum Health
- Practice Fusion vs Sysmex
- Practice Fusion vs Epocrates
- Practice Fusion vs Figure 1
- Practice Fusion vs Fullscript
- Practice Fusion vs GNU Health
- Practice Fusion vs GoodRx
- Practice Fusion vs Halaxy
- Therapixel vs Athenahealth
- Therapixel vs Epic Systems
- Therapixel vs Cerner
- Therapixel vs Amwell
- Therapixel vs DrChrono
- Therapixel vs Kareo Clinical
- Therapixel vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Therapixel vs ChiroTouch
- Therapixel vs NextGen Healthcare
- Therapixel vs WebPT
- Therapixel vs eClinicalWorks
- Therapixel vs Healthie
- Therapixel vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Therapixel vs PioneerRx
- Therapixel vs Rad AI
- Therapixel vs Aidoc
- Therapixel vs Annalise.ai
- Therapixel vs Rx30
- Therapixel vs Lunit
- Therapixel vs Gleamer
- Therapixel vs Techcyte
- Therapixel vs Paige
- Therapixel vs PathAI
- Therapixel vs Clue
- Therapixel vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Therapixel vs Quantum Health
- Therapixel vs Sysmex
- Therapixel vs Epocrates
- Therapixel vs Figure 1
- Therapixel vs Fullscript
- Therapixel vs GNU Health
- Therapixel vs GoodRx
- Therapixel vs Halaxy

