Therapixelvs
Lunit

Lunit: Lunit covers mammography, tomosynthesis and chest radiography in one portfolio and owns Volpara for density and risk
French mammography AI with FDA clearances for 2D and tomosynthesis breast screening
As of 1 September 2026, Therapixel's pricing is not published; the vendor quotes on request. Therapixel makes MammoScreen, an AI that scores mammographic findings for suspicion on a one to ten scale. Softwr lists it under Healthcare. Therapixel is made by Therapixel SA, available on Web.
Overview
Therapixel is a French medical imaging company whose product is MammoScreen, software that automatically detects and characterises soft tissue lesions and calcifications on mammograms and returns a suspicion score from one to ten per finding, plus a study level score. The one to ten scale is deliberate: it is designed to sit alongside a radiologist BI-RADS assessment as a graded signal rather than as a binary positive or negative, which changes how a reader integrates it into a decision. The regulatory history is the fact that decides a purchase. Therapixel received FDA 510(k) clearance K192854 for MammoScreen on two dimensional mammography in July 2020, a second clearance extending it to digital breast tomosynthesis in November 2021, and two further clearances in October 2024 covering later versions. In Europe it is CE marked, but European medical device rules moved from the old Medical Device Directive to the Medical Device Regulation, and diagnostic AI of this class sits at a higher risk classification under MDR with notified body scrutiny to match. European buyers should ask for the current MDR certificate and its expiry, not a legacy CE reference, because a lapsed or transitional certificate is a procurement blocker in public screening programmes. Buyers are breast screening programmes and breast imaging centres, and they are much more concentrated in Europe than in the United States, where Hologic and iCAD have incumbency in the mammography workstation. The trade off is scope: MammoScreen does one thing, mammography, and a hospital wanting AI across head CT, chest and breast will need several vendors and several integrations unless it buys an orchestration layer.
The honest half
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Therapixel.
Cross-shopped
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.

Lunit: Lunit covers mammography, tomosynthesis and chest radiography in one portfolio and owns Volpara for density and risk

Aidoc: Aidoc is the choice when the need is acute triage across multiple body regions rather than breast screening
Pricing
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
MammoScreen
On request
Capabilities
MammoScreen 2D
Detection and characterisation of soft tissue lesions and calcifications on full field digital mammography
MammoScreen DBT
Cleared extension to digital breast tomosynthesis, which is the reading time problem in most modern breast centres
One to ten suspicion score
Per finding and per study suspicion scores designed to be read as a graded signal alongside BI-RADS rather than as a binary flag
Summary report
A single per study report characterising each finding, intended to be reviewed before or alongside the radiologist read
Workstation and PACS delivery
Results returned into mammography reading workstations and PACS through standard DICOM output
Reading workflow configurations
Supports concurrent reading, second reader and triage configurations depending on what local regulation permits
Answered, with sources
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
Yes. It holds 510(k) clearance K192854 for two dimensional mammography from July 2020, a November 2021 clearance for digital breast tomosynthesis, and two further clearances in October 2024 for later versions.
Yes, but European buyers should ask specifically for the current certificate under the Medical Device Regulation and its expiry date, because this class of diagnostic AI moved to a higher classification under MDR.
It is a graded suspicion score per finding and per study, designed to be integrated alongside a radiologist BI-RADS assessment rather than treated as a positive or negative result.
No. It is a mammography product only, including tomosynthesis. Other body regions need a different vendor.
Keep looking
FDA cleared and CE marked AI for mammography, tomosynthesis and chest radiography
FDA cleared radiology AI for triage and notification of time critical findings
CE marked and FDA cleared imaging AI suite for bone trauma and chest, now owned by RadNet
AI digital pathology across clinical, veterinary and environmental laboratory disciplines
Digital pathology AI holding the first FDA De Novo authorisation for a pathology algorithm, now part of Tempus
Digital pathology image management with an FDA cleared platform for primary diagnosis
Period and cycle tracking app owned by German company Biowink, positioned around science based tracking and a published stance against sharing data with law enforcement
Long-established pharmacy management system for independents and small chains
Multi-finding chest X-ray and head CT triage AI with FDA clearance on named findings, not on the whole model
Cancer detection AI for breast, prostate and gastric pathology deployed in routine clinical service, not just pilots
Healthcare navigation for self insured employers, delivered by pods of human care coordinators
Haematology and urinalysis analysers sold with the middleware that decides which results a scientist ever sees
Supplement dispensing for practitioners, free to use because it earns on the products
Free hospital and health information system from a small NGO, built on the Tryton framework
Practice management for allied health that charges nothing for the software and earns on payments
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Therapixel, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
What people switch to, and what they give up
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Clinical laboratory middleware and informatics from a diagnostics instrument manufacturer
quoteOpen source hospital information system and EMR for low-resource hospitals, built on OpenMRS
Open source, no licence feePeriod and cycle tracking app owned by German company Biowink, positioned around science based tracking and a published stance against sharing data with law enforcement
Free with a Plus subscriptionPeriod and cycle tracking app that settled with the US FTC in 2021 over sharing health data with third parties despite promising not to
Free with a Premium subscriptionOpen source health information platform run from the University of Oslo and used by national ministries
Open source, no licence feeMulti-finding chest X-ray and head CT triage AI with FDA clearance on named findings, not on the whole model
quote