Automation Integration · head to head
Cyclr vs Inngest

Cyclr
Automation Integration
Embedded integration platform that SaaS vendors ship inside their own product
- From
- $1595/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Inngest has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Cyclr entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.; Inngest hobby plans pause execution once free quota exhausted; upgrade required to continue
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cyclr and Inngest actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cyclr
- White-label integration UI
- Connector library
- Workflow builder
- Custom connectors
- Regional hosting
- MCP server offering
- Usage metering
- Templates
Only in Inngest
Nothing recorded that Cyclr does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cyclr
- A mid-market SaaS vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a CRM integration it has not builtnot Inngest
- A product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectorsnot Inngest
- A European software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the EU for procurement reasonsnot Inngest
- A vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connectornot Inngest
Inngest
- Handling unpredictable LLM behavior with fine-grained error controlnot Cyclr
- Retrying failed workflow steps independently without restartingnot Cyclr
- Rate limiting per-tenant usage on shared infrastructurenot Cyclr
- Processing thousands of webhooks per event with replay capabilitynot Cyclr
- Persisting state across serverless function invocationsnot Cyclr
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cyclr
- Entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.
- Connectors and API calls are metered separately, so a successful integration marketplace pushes you up tiers as your customers adopt it, meaning the cost rises with usage rather than with the revenue that usage generates.
- Custom connectors to APIs outside the library are your work to build and maintain, so the promise of not building integrations only holds for applications Cyclr already covers.
- Debugging is harder when the integration runs in a third-party runtime, because your support team sees a failed workflow rather than an HTTP response and has to escalate to Cyclr for anything non-obvious.
- Deep embedding creates real switching cost: your customers' live integrations run on Cyclr, so migrating later means recreating every customer workflow, which in practice means you rarely leave.
Inngest
- Hobby plans pause execution once free quota exhausted; upgrade required to continue
- Pro plan overages carry tiered metering: additional concurrent steps at $25 per 25, span data at $3/GB, scores at $1.50 per 1K, events at $0.50 per 1M
Pricing, plan by plan
Cyclr
$1595/month- PAYG$1595/month
- 100,000 API calls included
- 1 connector included
- Unlimited integrations and users
- Growth$2595/month
- 1,000,000 API calls included
- 10 connectors included
- Everything in PAYG
- Scale$7195/month
- 5,000,000 API calls included
- Unlimited connectors
- Everything in Growth
- Private Cloud$undefined/month
- Dedicated hosting in US, UK or EU
- Configurable processing and runtime
- Quoted pricing
Inngest
Free- HobbyFree
- 50k executions/month
- 5 concurrent steps
- 500 MB span data
- Pro$99/month starting
- 1M executions included, pay-as-you-go up to 20M
- 100+ concurrent steps
- 5 GB span data ingested
- Enterprise$null/custom
- customizable metrics
- 90-day trace retention
- SAML, RBAC, audit trails
Which should you pick?
Choose Cyclr if
- You need white-label integration ui.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want connector library.
Questions people ask
- Is Cyclr or Inngest better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cyclr starts at $1595/month and Inngest at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cyclr or Inngest?
- Inngest has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $1595/month for Cyclr and Free for Inngest.
- Does Cyclr or Inngest run on more platforms?
- Cyclr runs on Web, API. Inngest runs on Web.
- Can I use Inngest for free?
- Yes. Inngest has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Cyclr starts at $1595/month.
- What is Cyclr best used for?
- Cyclr is most often used for a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built, a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors, a european software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the eu for procurement reasons, a vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connector. Of those, a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built and a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors are not what Inngest is typically brought in for.
- What can Cyclr do that Inngest cannot?
- Cyclr covers White-label integration UI, Connector library, Workflow builder, Custom connectors.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cyclr: What does Cyclr actually cost?
Published tiers start at 1,595 US dollars per month for 100,000 API calls and one connector, rising to 7,195 for unlimited connectors and five million calls.
Inngest: How much does Inngest cost?
Inngest offers a free Hobby plan with 50k executions per month and up to 3 users. Pro plans start at $99 per month with 1M executions included and support for up to 15 users. Additional Pro users cost $10 each. Enterprise plans require custom pricing.
SourceCyclr: Do my customers know they are using Cyclr?
No. The interface is white-labelled to appear as part of your product.
Inngest: Is there a free version of Inngest?
Yes, the Hobby plan is completely free and includes 50k executions per month, 5 concurrent steps, 500 MB span data ingested, 10K scores, 500k events ingested, and support for up to 3 users. Plan changes pause execution once the free quota is exhausted.
SourceCyclr: Can I host it in the EU or UK?
Yes, on the private cloud tiers, which matters for European procurement requirements.
Inngest: What are the overage costs on Inngest Pro?
Inngest Pro includes 1M executions with additional executions at $0.50 per 1M up to 20M. Span data overages cost $3 per GB, scores at $1.50 per 1K, and events at $0.50 per 1M. Additional concurrent steps cost $25 per 25 steps beyond the included 100+.
SourceCyclr: What if the connector I need does not exist?
You build a custom connector using Cyclr tooling, which is work you own rather than work the platform removes.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cyclr vs Tray.io
- Cyclr vs Celigo
- Cyclr vs Workato
- Cyclr vs Alloy Automation
- Cyclr vs Paragon
- Cyclr vs Nango
- Cyclr vs Merge
- Cyclr vs Hatchet
- Cyclr vs Zapier
- Cyclr vs MuleSoft
- Cyclr vs Dagster
- Cyclr vs Fivetran
- Cyclr vs Informatica
- Cyclr vs Integromat
- Cyclr vs jBPM
- Cyclr vs Kogito
- Cyclr vs Letta
- Cyclr vs Lytics
- Cyclr vs n8n
- Cyclr vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Cyclr vs Temporal
- Cyclr vs Trigger.dev
- Cyclr vs Prefect
- Cyclr vs Mage AI
- Cyclr vs Windmill
- Cyclr vs Browserbase
- Cyclr vs Flowise
- Inngest vs Tray.io
- Inngest vs Celigo
- Inngest vs Workato
- Inngest vs Alloy Automation
- Inngest vs Paragon
- Inngest vs Nango
- Inngest vs Merge
- Inngest vs Hatchet
- Inngest vs Zapier
- Inngest vs MuleSoft
- Inngest vs Dagster
- Inngest vs Fivetran
- Inngest vs Informatica
- Inngest vs Integromat
- Inngest vs jBPM
- Inngest vs Kogito
- Inngest vs Letta
- Inngest vs Lytics
- Inngest vs n8n
- Inngest vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Inngest vs Temporal
- Inngest vs Trigger.dev
- Inngest vs Prefect
- Inngest vs Mage AI
- Inngest vs Windmill
- Inngest vs Browserbase
- Inngest vs Flowise

