Softwr

Automation Integration · alternatives

Alternatives to Inngest

24 automation integration tools sit alongside Inngest in this directory. Below is what separates each from Inngest on the figures we hold, price, model, tier count and rating, and a direct comparison for every one.

Alternatives listed
24
With a free tier
16
Cheaper to start
0
Inngest starts at
Free

Why people look past Inngest

Nothing on the record flags a reason to move. Inngest has a free tier, and starts at Free against a category median of $100/month. People still switch over fit and workflow, and those are not things a catalogue entry can measure, which is what the comparisons below are for.

What each alternative does differently

Ordered by the aggregated rating on each catalogue entry. Differences are drawn from price, pricing model, tier count and rating, the fields the category listing carries. For a feature-level difference, follow the head-to-head link on each card: those pages read both full records.

Free, then €20/month

The fair-code workflow automation tool

  • Starts $20 a month dearer, at €20/month.
  • Sold on a subscription model rather than freemium.
  • 4 tiers to Inngest's 3.
Free, then $15/month

Automate tasks across cloud and on-premises apps

  • Starts $15 a month dearer, at $15/month.
  • 4 tiers to Inngest's 3.
Free, then $19.99/month

Automate your work across 7,000+ app integrations

  • Starts $19.99 a month dearer, at $19.99/month.
  • Sold on a usage-based model rather than freemium.
$1500/monthly

Integration platform as a service (iPaaS) with robust API management

  • No free tier, where Inngest has one.
  • Starts $1500 a monthly dearer, at $1500/monthly.
  • Sold on a subscription model rather than freemium.

Managed Apache Flink and Debezium with credit-based pricing and a free tier

  • Sold on a Per credit by task hour model rather than freemium.
Free, then $500/month

Postgres-backed distributed task queue and workflow engine for Python, TypeScript and Go

  • Starts $500 a month dearer, at $500/month.
  • Sold on a Per month by task run count model rather than freemium.
  • 4 tiers to Inngest's 3.

Every Inngest alternative at a glance

A dash means the catalogue entry carries no figure, not that the answer is nothing.

Automation Integration alternatives to Inngest
ToolEntry priceModelTiersHead to head
Inngest (this page)FreeFreemium3
n8nThe fair-code workflow automation toolFree, then €20/monthSubscription4vs Inngest
Microsoft Power AutomateAutomate tasks across cloud and on-premises appsFree, then $15/month-4vs Inngest
ZapierAutomate your work across 7,000+ app integrationsFree, then $19.99/monthUsage-based3vs Inngest
MuleSoftIntegration platform as a service (iPaaS) with robust API management$1500/monthlySubscription3vs Inngest
DecodableFreePer credit by task hour3vs Inngest
HatchetFree, then $500/monthPer month by task run count4vs Inngest
NangoFree, then $50/monthPer connection per month4vs Inngest
KogitoFreeOpen source, no licence fee1vs Inngest
FlowableFreeQuote2vs Inngest
MeltanoFreeOpen source, no licence fee1vs Inngest
jBPMFreeOpen source, no licence fee1vs Inngest
ActivitiFreeOpen source, no licence fee1vs Inngest
OrkesFreeQuote2vs Inngest
PrefectFree, then $100/monthFreemium with per-user and usage-based tiers4vs Inngest
DagsterFree, then $10/monthFree open-source core plus paid cloud platform4vs Inngest
WindmillFree, then $120/monthOpen-source2vs Inngest
AutonolyFree, then $29/monthFreemium5vs Inngest
HighByte Intelligence Hub$18500/yearPer site per year4vs Inngest
Cyclr$1595/monthPer month by API call volume4vs Inngest
Alloy AutomationOn requestQuote1vs Inngest
IBM MQ$312/monthPer virtual processor core per month3vs Inngest
CamundaOn requestQuote1vs Inngest
Mage AI$100/monthUsage-based cloud platform4vs Inngest
HighLevel$97/monthSubscription4vs Inngest

Ratings are aggregated from third-party sources and imported with each catalogue entry; Softwr hosts no reviews of these products. How each figure is used is set out on the Inngest badges page.

Cheaper ways to solve the same problem

Free to start (16)

These publish a tier that costs nothing, so they can be evaluated before any money changes hands.

What you would be giving up

Inngest is most often brought in for handling unpredictable llm behavior with fine-grained error control, retrying failed workflow steps independently without restarting, rate limiting per-tenant usage on shared infrastructure, processing thousands of webhooks per event with replay capability, persisting state across serverless function invocations. Anything replacing it has to cover the ones you actually depend on, and a cheaper tool that misses one of them is not cheaper.

Two things this page cannot settle. It compares on price, model, tier count and rating, because those are the fields the category listing carries, feature-level differences need both full records, which is what the head-to-head pages load. And the ratings are third-party aggregates imported with each entry rather than reviews written here, so a 0.2 difference between two tools is noise rather than a finding.

If Inngest is broadly right and the question is cost, the Inngest pricing breakdown covers every tier and what each one adds. If you want the whole field rather than a shortlist, the Automation Integration category lists everything the directory holds, and best automation integration tools ranks them.

Inngest runs on not recorded. Platform coverage is not carried on the category listing for the alternatives, so it is one more thing to check on each head-to-head page rather than here.

Questions about Inngest alternatives

What are the main alternatives to Inngest?
24 other automation integration tools are listed in this directory, led by n8n, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier, MuleSoft. They are ordered by the aggregated rating on each catalogue entry, not by any Softwr ranking.
What is the best free alternative to Inngest?
16 of the alternatives listed here can be used without paying: n8n, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier, Decodable, Hatchet.
Is there a reason to switch away from Inngest?
Nothing in the data flags one. Inngest has a free tier, and starts at Free against a category median of $100/month. Fit and workflow are the usual reasons to move, and those are not things this record can measure.
What would I give up by switching from Inngest?
Inngest is most often brought in for handling unpredictable llm behavior with fine-grained error control, retrying failed workflow steps independently without restarting, rate limiting per-tenant usage on shared infrastructure, processing thousands of webhooks per event with replay capability, persisting state across serverless function invocations. Anything you replace it with has to cover the ones you actually rely on, the side-by-side comparisons linked from each alternative below put the two feature records against each other.
Is there an open-source alternative to Inngest?
Windmill is recorded with an open-source licence model.
How were these Inngest alternatives chosen?
They are the tools filed in the same category, Automation Integration, ordered by the aggregated rating on each entry. There is no editorial shortlist, and nothing on this page is paid: no sponsored placement runs on alternatives pages and the order cannot be bought. Softwr has not used these products.
Where can I compare Inngest against one of these directly?
Every alternative below has a side-by-side page against Inngest covering price, platforms, features and what each one is used for. Those pages read the full record for both products rather than the summary shown here.
Does this list cover every automation integration tool?
No. It covers what this directory holds in the Automation Integration category, 24 tools beside Inngest. The category page lists the rest of the catalogue as it grows.

Related pages