Automation & Integration · head to head
Inngest vs n8n
Inngest
Automation & Integration
Unbreakable Agents. Invisible Infra.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only n8n has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Inngest the free Hobby tier pauses function execution entirely once its 50,000 monthly executions are used, rather than allowing pay-as-you-go overage, as of August 2026.; n8n starter tier limited to 1 project and 5 concurrent executions
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Inngest and n8n actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation & Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Inngest
Nothing recorded that n8n does not also cover.
Only in n8n
- Workflow automation
- Visual editor
- Conditional execution
- Looping
- Error handling
- Scheduling
- Webhooks
- REST API
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Inngest
No use cases recorded yet. See the Inngest review.
n8n
- Building AI agents and workflow automation for technical teamsnot Inngest
- Visual workflow design with capability to write custom JavaScript or Python codenot Inngest
- Enterprise deployments with self-hosted or cloud optionsnot Inngest
- Integrating 500+ pre-built applications with custom API connectionsnot Inngest
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Inngest
- The free Hobby tier pauses function execution entirely once its 50,000 monthly executions are used, rather than allowing pay-as-you-go overage, as of August 2026.
n8n
- Starter tier limited to 1 project and 5 concurrent executions
- Starter and Pro tiers restricted to Cloud hosting only, not self-hosted
- Business tier requires 6 months minimum commitment at €667/month
- SSO/SAML/LDAP authentication requires Business or Enterprise tier
- Dedicated support with SLA available only on Enterprise plan
Pricing, plan by plan
Inngest
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Inngest review.
n8n
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the n8n review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Inngest if
Nothing in the data separates Inngest from n8n on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose n8n if
- You need workflow automation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Docker, Self-hosted.
- You also want visual editor.
Questions people ask
- Is Inngest or n8n better?
- Neither clearly leads. Inngest starts at On request and n8n at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Inngest or n8n?
- n8n has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Inngest and Free for n8n.
- Does Inngest or n8n run on more platforms?
- Inngest runs on Web. n8n runs on Web, Docker, Self-hosted.
- Can I use n8n for free?
- Yes. n8n has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Inngest starts at On request.
- What can Inngest do that n8n cannot?
- n8n covers Workflow automation, Visual editor, Conditional execution, Looping.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Inngest vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Inngest vs Zapier
- Inngest vs MuleSoft
- Inngest vs Parabola
- Inngest vs Zapier Plus
- Inngest vs Jitterbit
- Inngest vs mParticle
- Inngest vs Paragon
- Inngest vs RudderStack
- Inngest vs Workato
- Inngest vs Airbyte
- Inngest vs Automate.io
- Inngest vs Boomi
- Inngest vs Browser Use
- Inngest vs Browserbase
- Inngest vs Celigo
- Inngest vs Census
- Inngest vs CrewAI
- n8n vs Microsoft Power Automate
- n8n vs Zapier
- n8n vs MuleSoft
- n8n vs Parabola
- n8n vs Zapier Plus
- n8n vs Jitterbit
- n8n vs mParticle
- n8n vs Paragon
- n8n vs RudderStack
- n8n vs Workato
- n8n vs Airbyte
- n8n vs Automate.io
- n8n vs Boomi
- n8n vs Browser Use
- n8n vs Browserbase
- n8n vs Celigo
- n8n vs Census
- n8n vs CrewAI

