Automation Integration · head to head
Inngest vs Integromat
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Inngest hobby plans pause execution once free quota exhausted; upgrade required to continue; Integromat the free plan enforces a 15 minute minimum interval between runs, so nothing near real time is possible without paying
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Inngest and Integromat actually diverge.
| Attribute | Inngest | Integromat |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web | Web, Api |
| Founded | Unknown | 2013 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Inngest
Nothing recorded that Integromat does not also cover.
Only in Integromat
- Visual workflow builder
- Webhooks
- Data transformation
- Error handling
- Conditional logic
- Scheduling
- Team collaboration
- 1000+ apps
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Inngest
- Handling unpredictable LLM behavior with fine-grained error controlnot Integromat
- Retrying failed workflow steps independently without restartingnot Integromat
- Rate limiting per-tenant usage on shared infrastructurenot Integromat
- Processing thousands of webhooks per event with replay capabilitynot Integromat
- Persisting state across serverless function invocationsnot Integromat
Integromat
- workflow automationnot Inngest
- integration between appsnot Inngest
- task automationnot Inngest
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Inngest
- Hobby plans pause execution once free quota exhausted; upgrade required to continue
- Pro plan overages carry tiered metering: additional concurrent steps at $25 per 25, span data at $3/GB, scores at $1.50 per 1K, events at $0.50 per 1M
Integromat
- The free plan enforces a 15 minute minimum interval between runs, so nothing near real time is possible without paying
- Free is limited to 2 active scenarios, a 5 MB file size and 7 days of execution logs
- Billing is per credit where each module action counts as one, so a scenario with many steps consumes credits far faster than its run count suggests
- Make API access requires a paid plan
- Priority execution and full text log search are Pro features
- Overage protection is Enterprise only, so cheaper plans can run up charges
Pricing, plan by plan
Inngest
Free- HobbyFree
- 50k executions/month
- 5 concurrent steps
- 500 MB span data
- Pro$99/month starting
- 1M executions included, pay-as-you-go up to 20M
- 100+ concurrent steps
- 5 GB span data ingested
- Enterprise$null/custom
- customizable metrics
- 90-day trace retention
- SAML, RBAC, audit trails
Integromat
Free- FreeFree
- 1000 credits monthly
- basic workflow builder
- access to 3000+ apps
- Core$9/month
- 10k credits
- unlimited active scenarios
- scheduled scenarios down to the minute
- Pro$16/month
- 10k credits
- priority execution
- custom variables
- Teams$29/month
- 10k credits
- team collaboration
- team roles
Which should you pick?
Choose Integromat if
- You need visual workflow builder.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want webhooks.
Questions people ask
- Is Inngest or Integromat better?
- Neither clearly leads. Inngest starts at Free and Integromat at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Inngest or Integromat?
- Inngest starts at Free and Integromat at Free.
- Does Inngest or Integromat run on more platforms?
- Inngest runs on Web. Integromat runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Inngest for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Inngest best used for?
- Inngest is most often used for handling unpredictable llm behavior with fine-grained error control, retrying failed workflow steps independently without restarting, rate limiting per-tenant usage on shared infrastructure, processing thousands of webhooks per event with replay capability. Of those, handling unpredictable llm behavior with fine-grained error control and retrying failed workflow steps independently without restarting are not what Integromat is typically brought in for.
- What can Inngest do that Integromat cannot?
- Integromat covers Visual workflow builder, Webhooks, Data transformation, Error handling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Inngest: How much does Inngest cost?
Inngest offers a free Hobby plan with 50k executions per month and up to 3 users. Pro plans start at $99 per month with 1M executions included and support for up to 15 users. Additional Pro users cost $10 each. Enterprise plans require custom pricing.
SourceIntegromat: What is the free tier for Make?
Make's free tier provides 1,000 credits monthly, access to 3,000+ apps, a basic no-code workflow builder, and a 15-minute minimum interval between scenario runs.
SourceInngest: Is there a free version of Inngest?
Yes, the Hobby plan is completely free and includes 50k executions per month, 5 concurrent steps, 500 MB span data ingested, 10K scores, 500k events ingested, and support for up to 3 users. Plan changes pause execution once the free quota is exhausted.
SourceIntegromat: Can I save money with annual billing on Make?
Yes, Make offers 15% or more savings when paying annually instead of monthly billing.
SourceInngest: What are the overage costs on Inngest Pro?
Inngest Pro includes 1M executions with additional executions at $0.50 per 1M up to 20M. Span data overages cost $3 per GB, scores at $1.50 per 1K, and events at $0.50 per 1M. Additional concurrent steps cost $25 per 25 steps beyond the included 100+.
SourceIntegromat: How does Make's credit system work?
Each module action in Make consumes credits, with most basic actions using one credit per execution. Credits expire monthly for monthly plans or annually for yearly subscriptions.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Inngest vs Hatchet
- Inngest vs n8n
- Inngest vs Zapier
- Inngest vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Inngest vs MuleSoft
- Inngest vs Temporal
- Inngest vs Trigger.dev
- Inngest vs Prefect
- Inngest vs Mage AI
- Inngest vs Windmill
- Inngest vs Browserbase
- Inngest vs Flowise
- Inngest vs Informatica
- Inngest vs jBPM
- Inngest vs Kogito
- Inngest vs Letta
- Inngest vs Lytics
- Inngest vs Xano
- Inngest vs Pipedream
- Inngest vs Automate.io
- Inngest vs Parabola
- Inngest vs Nintex
- Inngest vs Tray.io
- Inngest vs Paragon
- Inngest vs HighLevel
- Inngest vs Grouparoo
- Inngest vs Hevo Data
- Inngest vs HighByte Intelligence Hub
- Inngest vs Salesforce Flows
- Integromat vs Hatchet
- Integromat vs n8n
- Integromat vs Zapier
- Integromat vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Integromat vs MuleSoft
- Integromat vs Temporal
- Integromat vs Trigger.dev
- Integromat vs Prefect
- Integromat vs Mage AI
- Integromat vs Windmill
- Integromat vs Browserbase
- Integromat vs Flowise
- Integromat vs Informatica
- Integromat vs jBPM
- Integromat vs Kogito
- Integromat vs Letta
- Integromat vs Lytics
- Integromat vs Xano
- Integromat vs Pipedream
- Integromat vs Automate.io
- Integromat vs Parabola
- Integromat vs Nintex
- Integromat vs Tray.io
- Integromat vs Paragon
- Integromat vs HighLevel
- Integromat vs Grouparoo
- Integromat vs Hevo Data
- Integromat vs HighByte Intelligence Hub
- Integromat vs Salesforce Flows


