Automation Integration · head to head
Inngest vs Temporal

Temporal
Automation Integration
Durable execution platform for fault-tolerant workflows.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Inngest hobby plans pause execution once free quota exhausted; upgrade required to continue; Temporal cloud pricing scales with action volume, with per-million overage fees ($50 per million initially)
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Inngest and Temporal actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Inngest
- Handling unpredictable LLM behavior with fine-grained error controlnot Temporal
- Retrying failed workflow steps independently without restartingnot Temporal
- Rate limiting per-tenant usage on shared infrastructurenot Temporal
- Processing thousands of webhooks per event with replay capabilitynot Temporal
- Persisting state across serverless function invocationsnot Temporal
Temporal
- AI pipeline orchestration and long-running AI workflowsnot Inngest
- Distributed system workflows requiring state durabilitynot Inngest
- Complex backend processes with retry requirementsnot Inngest
- High-volume asynchronous task executionnot Inngest
- Microservices coordination with guaranteed state consistencynot Inngest
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Inngest
- Hobby plans pause execution once free quota exhausted; upgrade required to continue
- Pro plan overages carry tiered metering: additional concurrent steps at $25 per 25, span data at $3/GB, scores at $1.50 per 1K, events at $0.50 per 1M
Temporal
- Cloud pricing scales with action volume, with per-million overage fees ($50 per million initially)
- Enterprise customers incur additional storage costs beyond base allocations
- Self-hosted deployments require operational expertise to deploy and maintain the Temporal Service
- No native workflow UI builder; workflows must be defined in code
- Free tier limited to self-hosted option only; no free cloud tier
Pricing, plan by plan
Inngest
Free- HobbyFree
- 50k executions/month
- 5 concurrent steps
- 500 MB span data
- Pro$99/month starting
- 1M executions included, pay-as-you-go up to 20M
- 100+ concurrent steps
- 5 GB span data ingested
- Enterprise$null/custom
- customizable metrics
- 90-day trace retention
- SAML, RBAC, audit trails
Temporal
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Self-hosted deployment
- Full platform functionality
- Community support
- Essentials$100/month
- 1 million actions monthly
- 1 GB active storage
- 40 GB retained storage
- Business$500/month
- 2.5 million actions monthly
- 2.5 GB active storage
- 100 GB retained storage
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- 10 million actions monthly
- 10 GB active storage
- 400 GB retained storage
Which should you pick?
Choose Temporal if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, API, Self-hosted.
Questions people ask
- Is Inngest or Temporal better?
- Neither clearly leads. Inngest starts at Free and Temporal at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Inngest or Temporal?
- Inngest starts at Free and Temporal at Free.
- Does Inngest or Temporal run on more platforms?
- Inngest runs on Web. Temporal runs on Web, API, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Inngest for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Inngest best used for?
- Inngest is most often used for handling unpredictable llm behavior with fine-grained error control, retrying failed workflow steps independently without restarting, rate limiting per-tenant usage on shared infrastructure, processing thousands of webhooks per event with replay capability. Of those, handling unpredictable llm behavior with fine-grained error control and retrying failed workflow steps independently without restarting are not what Temporal is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Inngest: How much does Inngest cost?
Inngest offers a free Hobby plan with 50k executions per month and up to 3 users. Pro plans start at $99 per month with 1M executions included and support for up to 15 users. Additional Pro users cost $10 each. Enterprise plans require custom pricing.
SourceTemporal: What programming languages does Temporal support?
Temporal provides native SDKs for Go, Java, .NET, PHP, Python, Ruby, Rust, and TypeScript.
SourceInngest: Is there a free version of Inngest?
Yes, the Hobby plan is completely free and includes 50k executions per month, 5 concurrent steps, 500 MB span data ingested, 10K scores, 500k events ingested, and support for up to 3 users. Plan changes pause execution once the free quota is exhausted.
SourceTemporal: Can I run Temporal on-premises or self-hosted?
Yes. Temporal is available as open-source software under the MIT license, allowing self-hosted deployment. Temporal Cloud is also available as a managed service alternative.
SourceInngest: What are the overage costs on Inngest Pro?
Inngest Pro includes 1M executions with additional executions at $0.50 per 1M up to 20M. Span data overages cost $3 per GB, scores at $1.50 per 1K, and events at $0.50 per 1M. Additional concurrent steps cost $25 per 25 steps beyond the included 100+.
SourceTemporal: What is included in the free tier?
$1,000 in free credits for new users to explore Temporal Cloud. Self-hosted Temporal is available free with full platform functionality.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Inngest vs Hatchet
- Inngest vs n8n
- Inngest vs Zapier
- Inngest vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Inngest vs MuleSoft
- Inngest vs Trigger.dev
- Inngest vs Prefect
- Inngest vs Mage AI
- Inngest vs Windmill
- Inngest vs Browserbase
- Inngest vs Flowise
- Inngest vs Informatica
- Inngest vs Integromat
- Inngest vs jBPM
- Inngest vs Kogito
- Inngest vs Letta
- Inngest vs Lytics
- Inngest vs Flowable
- Inngest vs Orkes
- Inngest vs Camunda
- Inngest vs Activiti
- Inngest vs Nango
- Inngest vs Census
- Inngest vs Decodable
- Inngest vs Dify
- Temporal vs Hatchet
- Temporal vs n8n
- Temporal vs Zapier
- Temporal vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Temporal vs MuleSoft
- Temporal vs Trigger.dev
- Temporal vs Prefect
- Temporal vs Mage AI
- Temporal vs Windmill
- Temporal vs Browserbase
- Temporal vs Flowise
- Temporal vs Informatica
- Temporal vs Integromat
- Temporal vs jBPM
- Temporal vs Kogito
- Temporal vs Letta
- Temporal vs Lytics
- Temporal vs Flowable
- Temporal vs Orkes
- Temporal vs Camunda
- Temporal vs Activiti
- Temporal vs Nango
- Temporal vs Census
- Temporal vs Decodable
- Temporal vs Dify

