Automation Integration · head to head
Cyclr vs Temporal

Cyclr
Automation Integration
Embedded integration platform that SaaS vendors ship inside their own product
- From
- $1595/month
- Rated
- -

Temporal
Automation Integration
Durable execution platform for fault-tolerant workflows.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Temporal has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Cyclr entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.; Temporal cloud pricing scales with action volume, with per-million overage fees ($50 per million initially)
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cyclr and Temporal actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cyclr
- White-label integration UI
- Connector library
- Workflow builder
- Custom connectors
- Regional hosting
- MCP server offering
- Usage metering
- Templates
Only in Temporal
Nothing recorded that Cyclr does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cyclr
- A mid-market SaaS vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a CRM integration it has not builtnot Temporal
- A product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectorsnot Temporal
- A European software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the EU for procurement reasonsnot Temporal
- A vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connectornot Temporal
Temporal
- AI pipeline orchestration and long-running AI workflowsnot Cyclr
- Distributed system workflows requiring state durabilitynot Cyclr
- Complex backend processes with retry requirementsnot Cyclr
- High-volume asynchronous task executionnot Cyclr
- Microservices coordination with guaranteed state consistencynot Cyclr
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cyclr
- Entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.
- Connectors and API calls are metered separately, so a successful integration marketplace pushes you up tiers as your customers adopt it, meaning the cost rises with usage rather than with the revenue that usage generates.
- Custom connectors to APIs outside the library are your work to build and maintain, so the promise of not building integrations only holds for applications Cyclr already covers.
- Debugging is harder when the integration runs in a third-party runtime, because your support team sees a failed workflow rather than an HTTP response and has to escalate to Cyclr for anything non-obvious.
- Deep embedding creates real switching cost: your customers' live integrations run on Cyclr, so migrating later means recreating every customer workflow, which in practice means you rarely leave.
Temporal
- Cloud pricing scales with action volume, with per-million overage fees ($50 per million initially)
- Enterprise customers incur additional storage costs beyond base allocations
- Self-hosted deployments require operational expertise to deploy and maintain the Temporal Service
- No native workflow UI builder; workflows must be defined in code
- Free tier limited to self-hosted option only; no free cloud tier
Pricing, plan by plan
Cyclr
$1595/month- PAYG$1595/month
- 100,000 API calls included
- 1 connector included
- Unlimited integrations and users
- Growth$2595/month
- 1,000,000 API calls included
- 10 connectors included
- Everything in PAYG
- Scale$7195/month
- 5,000,000 API calls included
- Unlimited connectors
- Everything in Growth
- Private Cloud$undefined/month
- Dedicated hosting in US, UK or EU
- Configurable processing and runtime
- Quoted pricing
Temporal
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Self-hosted deployment
- Full platform functionality
- Community support
- Essentials$100/month
- 1 million actions monthly
- 1 GB active storage
- 40 GB retained storage
- Business$500/month
- 2.5 million actions monthly
- 2.5 GB active storage
- 100 GB retained storage
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- 10 million actions monthly
- 10 GB active storage
- 400 GB retained storage
Which should you pick?
Choose Cyclr if
- You need white-label integration ui.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want connector library.
Choose Temporal if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, API, Self-hosted.
Questions people ask
- Is Cyclr or Temporal better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cyclr starts at $1595/month and Temporal at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cyclr or Temporal?
- Temporal has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $1595/month for Cyclr and Free for Temporal.
- Does Cyclr or Temporal run on more platforms?
- Cyclr runs on Web, API. Temporal runs on Web, API, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Temporal for free?
- Yes. Temporal has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Cyclr starts at $1595/month.
- What is Cyclr best used for?
- Cyclr is most often used for a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built, a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors, a european software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the eu for procurement reasons, a vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connector. Of those, a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built and a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors are not what Temporal is typically brought in for.
- What can Cyclr do that Temporal cannot?
- Cyclr covers White-label integration UI, Connector library, Workflow builder, Custom connectors.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cyclr: What does Cyclr actually cost?
Published tiers start at 1,595 US dollars per month for 100,000 API calls and one connector, rising to 7,195 for unlimited connectors and five million calls.
Temporal: What programming languages does Temporal support?
Temporal provides native SDKs for Go, Java, .NET, PHP, Python, Ruby, Rust, and TypeScript.
SourceCyclr: Do my customers know they are using Cyclr?
No. The interface is white-labelled to appear as part of your product.
Temporal: Can I run Temporal on-premises or self-hosted?
Yes. Temporal is available as open-source software under the MIT license, allowing self-hosted deployment. Temporal Cloud is also available as a managed service alternative.
SourceCyclr: Can I host it in the EU or UK?
Yes, on the private cloud tiers, which matters for European procurement requirements.
Temporal: What is included in the free tier?
$1,000 in free credits for new users to explore Temporal Cloud. Self-hosted Temporal is available free with full platform functionality.
SourceCyclr: What if the connector I need does not exist?
You build a custom connector using Cyclr tooling, which is work you own rather than work the platform removes.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cyclr vs Tray.io
- Cyclr vs Celigo
- Cyclr vs Workato
- Cyclr vs Alloy Automation
- Cyclr vs Paragon
- Cyclr vs Nango
- Cyclr vs Merge
- Cyclr vs Hatchet
- Cyclr vs Zapier
- Cyclr vs MuleSoft
- Cyclr vs Dagster
- Cyclr vs Fivetran
- Cyclr vs Informatica
- Cyclr vs Integromat
- Cyclr vs jBPM
- Cyclr vs Kogito
- Cyclr vs Letta
- Cyclr vs Lytics
- Cyclr vs Flowable
- Cyclr vs Orkes
- Cyclr vs Camunda
- Cyclr vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Cyclr vs Activiti
- Cyclr vs n8n
- Cyclr vs Census
- Cyclr vs Decodable
- Cyclr vs Dify
- Cyclr vs Flowise
- Temporal vs Tray.io
- Temporal vs Celigo
- Temporal vs Workato
- Temporal vs Alloy Automation
- Temporal vs Paragon
- Temporal vs Nango
- Temporal vs Merge
- Temporal vs Hatchet
- Temporal vs Zapier
- Temporal vs MuleSoft
- Temporal vs Dagster
- Temporal vs Fivetran
- Temporal vs Informatica
- Temporal vs Integromat
- Temporal vs jBPM
- Temporal vs Kogito
- Temporal vs Letta
- Temporal vs Lytics
- Temporal vs Flowable
- Temporal vs Orkes
- Temporal vs Camunda
- Temporal vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Temporal vs Activiti
- Temporal vs n8n
- Temporal vs Census
- Temporal vs Decodable
- Temporal vs Dify
- Temporal vs Flowise
