Automation Integration · head to head
Cyclr vs Windmill

Cyclr
Automation Integration
Embedded integration platform that SaaS vendors ship inside their own product
- From
- $1595/month
- Rated
- -

Windmill
Automation Integration
Open-source developer platform for building scripts, workflows, and internal apps
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Windmill has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Cyclr entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.; Windmill free self-hosted tier caps SSO users at 10 and workspaces at 3, requiring Enterprise for larger teams.
- They diverge on capability: Cyclr covers White-label integration UI, Windmill covers Script-to-workflow engine.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cyclr and Windmill actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cyclr
- White-label integration UI
- Connector library
- Workflow builder
- Custom connectors
- Regional hosting
- MCP server offering
- Usage metering
- Templates
Only in Windmill
- Script-to-workflow engine
- Auto-generated UIs
- Self-hosted deployment
- Git sync
- SSO support
- Audit logs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cyclr
- A mid-market SaaS vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a CRM integration it has not builtnot Windmill
- A product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectorsnot Windmill
- A European software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the EU for procurement reasonsnot Windmill
- A vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connectornot Windmill
Windmill
- Turning ad-hoc scripts into scheduled jobs and APIsnot Cyclr
- Building internal tools from existing Python/TypeScript codenot Cyclr
- Self-hosted automation for engineering teamsnot Cyclr
- Orchestrating multi-language workflowsnot Cyclr
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cyclr
- Entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.
- Connectors and API calls are metered separately, so a successful integration marketplace pushes you up tiers as your customers adopt it, meaning the cost rises with usage rather than with the revenue that usage generates.
- Custom connectors to APIs outside the library are your work to build and maintain, so the promise of not building integrations only holds for applications Cyclr already covers.
- Debugging is harder when the integration runs in a third-party runtime, because your support team sees a failed workflow rather than an HTTP response and has to escalate to Cyclr for anything non-obvious.
- Deep embedding creates real switching cost: your customers' live integrations run on Cyclr, so migrating later means recreating every customer workflow, which in practice means you rarely leave.
Windmill
- Free self-hosted tier caps SSO users at 10 and workspaces at 3, requiring Enterprise for larger teams.
- Compute unit and seat-based pricing (developer vs. operator seats, worker compute units) adds pricing complexity beyond a flat monthly fee.
- Email triggers are capped at 100/day on the free tier, limiting event-driven use cases without upgrading.
- Smaller ecosystem of pre-built integrations compared to more established automation tools like n8n.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cyclr
$1595/month- PAYG$1595/month
- 100,000 API calls included
- 1 connector included
- Unlimited integrations and users
- Growth$2595/month
- 1,000,000 API calls included
- 10 connectors included
- Everything in PAYG
- Scale$7195/month
- 5,000,000 API calls included
- Unlimited connectors
- Everything in Growth
- Private Cloud$undefined/month
- Dedicated hosting in US, UK or EU
- Configurable processing and runtime
- Quoted pricing
Windmill
Free- Free / Open-sourceFree
- Unlimited executions
- Self-hosted deployment
- Max 10 users with SSO
- Enterprise$120/month
- Unlimited executions and workspaces
- Uncapped SSO seats
- 24/7 priority support (3-hour response)
Which should you pick?
Choose Cyclr if
- You need white-label integration ui.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want connector library.
Choose Windmill if
- You need script-to-workflow engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api, linux, windows, mac.
- You also want auto-generated uis.
Questions people ask
- Is Cyclr or Windmill better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cyclr starts at $1595/month and Windmill at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cyclr or Windmill?
- Windmill has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $1595/month for Cyclr and Free for Windmill.
- Does Cyclr or Windmill run on more platforms?
- Cyclr runs on Web, API. Windmill runs on web, api, linux, windows, mac.
- Can I use Windmill for free?
- Yes. Windmill has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Cyclr starts at $1595/month.
- What is Cyclr best used for?
- Cyclr is most often used for a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built, a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors, a european software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the eu for procurement reasons, a vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connector. Of those, a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built and a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors are not what Windmill is typically brought in for.
- What can Cyclr do that Windmill cannot?
- Cyclr covers White-label integration UI, Connector library, Workflow builder, Custom connectors. Windmill covers Script-to-workflow engine, Auto-generated UIs, Self-hosted deployment, Git sync.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cyclr: What does Cyclr actually cost?
Published tiers start at 1,595 US dollars per month for 100,000 API calls and one connector, rising to 7,195 for unlimited connectors and five million calls.
Windmill: What does Windmill cost?
Windmill's Free and Open-source edition is $0/month for self-hosted use with unlimited executions, while Enterprise starts at $120/month with unlimited workspaces and uncapped SSO seats, priced further by developer/operator seats and compute units.
SourceCyclr: Do my customers know they are using Cyclr?
No. The interface is white-labelled to appear as part of your product.
Windmill: Is there a free plan and what are its limits?
The free self-hosted plan supports unlimited executions but caps SSO at 10 users, workspaces at 3, groups/permissions at 4, and email triggers at 100 per day.
SourceCyclr: Can I host it in the EU or UK?
Yes, on the private cloud tiers, which matters for European procurement requirements.
Windmill: How is usage metered on Windmill Enterprise?
Enterprise usage is metered through seats (developer seats at $20/month, operator seats at $10/month) and compute units, e.g. $100/month for 2 standard-worker compute units.
SourceCyclr: What if the connector I need does not exist?
You build a custom connector using Cyclr tooling, which is work you own rather than work the platform removes.
Windmill: What happens to a self-hosted Windmill deployment if the company shuts down?
The pricing page addresses this directly as an FAQ topic, noting that self-hosted applications built on the open-source edition can continue running independently of Windmill the company.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Cyclr vs Tray.io
- Cyclr vs Celigo
- Cyclr vs Workato
- Cyclr vs Alloy Automation
- Cyclr vs Paragon
- Cyclr vs Nango
- Cyclr vs Merge
- Cyclr vs Hatchet
- Cyclr vs Zapier
- Cyclr vs MuleSoft
- Cyclr vs Dagster
- Cyclr vs Fivetran
- Cyclr vs Informatica
- Cyclr vs Integromat
- Cyclr vs jBPM
- Cyclr vs Kogito
- Cyclr vs Letta
- Cyclr vs Lytics
- Cyclr vs n8n
- Cyclr vs Airbyte
- Cyclr vs Flowable
- Cyclr vs Meltano
- Cyclr vs RudderStack
- Cyclr vs Grouparoo
- Cyclr vs Activiti
- Cyclr vs Camunda
- Cyclr vs Flowise
- Cyclr vs Automate.io
- Cyclr vs Autonoly
- Cyclr vs Boomi
- Cyclr vs Browser Use
- Cyclr vs Browserbase
- Windmill vs Tray.io
- Windmill vs Celigo
- Windmill vs Workato
- Windmill vs Alloy Automation
- Windmill vs Paragon
- Windmill vs Nango
- Windmill vs Merge
- Windmill vs Hatchet
- Windmill vs Zapier
- Windmill vs MuleSoft
- Windmill vs Dagster
- Windmill vs Fivetran
- Windmill vs Informatica
- Windmill vs Integromat
- Windmill vs jBPM
- Windmill vs Kogito
- Windmill vs Letta
- Windmill vs Lytics
- Windmill vs n8n
- Windmill vs Airbyte
- Windmill vs Flowable
- Windmill vs Meltano
- Windmill vs RudderStack
- Windmill vs Grouparoo
- Windmill vs Activiti
- Windmill vs Camunda
- Windmill vs Flowise
- Windmill vs Automate.io
- Windmill vs Autonoly
- Windmill vs Boomi
- Windmill vs Browser Use
- Windmill vs Browserbase
