Automation Integration · head to head
Inngest vs Microsoft Power Automate

Microsoft Power Automate
Automation Integration
Automate tasks across cloud and on-premises apps
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Inngest hobby plans pause execution once free quota exhausted; upgrade required to continue; Microsoft Power Automate free plan limited to 750 flow runs/month and standard connectors only; premium connectors require paid plans
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Inngest and Microsoft Power Automate actually diverge.
| Attribute | Inngest | Microsoft Power Automate |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Unknown |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Cloud, Desktop |
| Founded | Unknown | 2016 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Inngest
Nothing recorded that Microsoft Power Automate does not also cover.
Only in Microsoft Power Automate
- Automated flows
- Instant flows
- Scheduled flows
- Desktop automation
- Process mining
- Business process flows
- Approval workflows
- 500+ connectors
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Inngest
- Handling unpredictable LLM behavior with fine-grained error controlnot Microsoft Power Automate
- Retrying failed workflow steps independently without restartingnot Microsoft Power Automate
- Rate limiting per-tenant usage on shared infrastructurenot Microsoft Power Automate
- Processing thousands of webhooks per event with replay capabilitynot Microsoft Power Automate
- Persisting state across serverless function invocationsnot Microsoft Power Automate
Microsoft Power Automate
- Workflow Automationnot Inngest
- Data Integrationnot Inngest
- Process Automationnot Inngest
- App Integrationnot Inngest
- API Connectivitynot Inngest
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Inngest
- Hobby plans pause execution once free quota exhausted; upgrade required to continue
- Pro plan overages carry tiered metering: additional concurrent steps at $25 per 25, span data at $3/GB, scores at $1.50 per 1K, events at $0.50 per 1M
Microsoft Power Automate
- Free plan limited to 750 flow runs/month and standard connectors only; premium connectors require paid plans
- Not suitable for long-running workflows; can fail unexpectedly without warning
- Limited to simple linear logic; fails with complex workflows involving multiple stakeholders
- Tasks cannot automate at scale when requiring more than approximately 60 users
Pricing, plan by plan
Inngest
Free- HobbyFree
- 50k executions/month
- 5 concurrent steps
- 500 MB span data
- Pro$99/month starting
- 1M executions included, pay-as-you-go up to 20M
- 100+ concurrent steps
- 5 GB span data ingested
- Enterprise$null/custom
- customizable metrics
- 90-day trace retention
- SAML, RBAC, audit trails
Microsoft Power Automate
Free- FreeFree
- 750 flow runs/month
- Standard connectors only
- Basic cloud flows
- Premium$15/user/month
- Cloud flows (DPA)
- Attended RPA
- 250 MB Dataverse database
- Process$150/bot/month
- Unattended automation
- Cloud and desktop flows
- 50 MB Dataverse database
- Hosted Process$215/bot/month
- Microsoft-managed virtual machine
- Unattended automation
- Same Dataverse entitlements as Process plan
Which should you pick?
Choose Microsoft Power Automate if
- You need automated flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Cloud, Desktop.
- You also want instant flows.
Questions people ask
- Is Inngest or Microsoft Power Automate better?
- Neither clearly leads. Inngest starts at Free and Microsoft Power Automate at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Inngest or Microsoft Power Automate?
- Inngest starts at Free and Microsoft Power Automate at Free.
- Does Inngest or Microsoft Power Automate run on more platforms?
- Inngest runs on Web. Microsoft Power Automate runs on Web, Cloud, Desktop.
- Can I use Inngest for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Inngest best used for?
- Inngest is most often used for handling unpredictable llm behavior with fine-grained error control, retrying failed workflow steps independently without restarting, rate limiting per-tenant usage on shared infrastructure, processing thousands of webhooks per event with replay capability. Of those, handling unpredictable llm behavior with fine-grained error control and retrying failed workflow steps independently without restarting are not what Microsoft Power Automate is typically brought in for.
- What can Inngest do that Microsoft Power Automate cannot?
- Microsoft Power Automate covers Automated flows, Instant flows, Scheduled flows, Desktop automation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Inngest: How much does Inngest cost?
Inngest offers a free Hobby plan with 50k executions per month and up to 3 users. Pro plans start at $99 per month with 1M executions included and support for up to 15 users. Additional Pro users cost $10 each. Enterprise plans require custom pricing.
SourceMicrosoft Power Automate: Is Power Automate included with Microsoft 365?
Yes. If you have an eligible Microsoft 365 subscription, you can use Power Automate at no extra cost for flows relying only on standard connectors (SharePoint, Outlook, Teams). Premium connectors (Salesforce, SAP, Oracle) require paid plans.
SourceInngest: Is there a free version of Inngest?
Yes, the Hobby plan is completely free and includes 50k executions per month, 5 concurrent steps, 500 MB span data ingested, 10K scores, 500k events ingested, and support for up to 3 users. Plan changes pause execution once the free quota is exhausted.
SourceMicrosoft Power Automate: How many flow runs are allowed on the free plan?
Power Automate's free tier (included with Microsoft 365) is limited to 750 flow runs per month and standard connectors only. Out of 900+ total connectors, the free plan only includes Microsoft ecosystem apps and limited third-party apps.
SourceInngest: What are the overage costs on Inngest Pro?
Inngest Pro includes 1M executions with additional executions at $0.50 per 1M up to 20M. Span data overages cost $3 per GB, scores at $1.50 per 1K, and events at $0.50 per 1M. Additional concurrent steps cost $25 per 25 steps beyond the included 100+.
SourceMicrosoft Power Automate: What's the difference between Premium and Process plans?
Premium ($15/user/month) provides attended automation with cloud flows and standard RPA. Process plan ($150/bot/month) enables unattended automation where bots run without human intervention on virtual machines for high-volume, repetitive tasks.
SourceMicrosoft Power Automate: Does Power Automate support long-running workflows?
No. Power Automate is not suitable for long-lasting workflows because they can run without warning and fail unexpectedly. The platform is built for linear, branching logic (if-then) rather than complex, multi-step business processes involving multiple stakeholders.
SourceRelated pages
More on Microsoft Power Automate
Other head to heads
- Inngest vs Hatchet
- Inngest vs n8n
- Inngest vs Zapier
- Inngest vs MuleSoft
- Inngest vs Temporal
- Inngest vs Trigger.dev
- Inngest vs Prefect
- Inngest vs Mage AI
- Inngest vs Windmill
- Inngest vs Browserbase
- Inngest vs Flowise
- Inngest vs Informatica
- Inngest vs Integromat
- Inngest vs jBPM
- Inngest vs Kogito
- Inngest vs Letta
- Inngest vs Lytics
- Inngest vs Paragon
- Inngest vs Celigo
- Inngest vs Workato
- Inngest vs Nintex
- Inngest vs Talend
- Inngest vs Tray.io
- Inngest vs Boomi
- Inngest vs Jitterbit
- Inngest vs Salesforce Flows
- Inngest vs Automate.io
- Inngest vs SnapLogic
- Inngest vs Hightouch
- Inngest vs Nango
- Inngest vs Pipedream
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Hatchet
- Microsoft Power Automate vs n8n
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Zapier
- Microsoft Power Automate vs MuleSoft
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Temporal
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Trigger.dev
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Prefect
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Mage AI
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Windmill
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Browserbase
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Flowise
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Informatica
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Integromat
- Microsoft Power Automate vs jBPM
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Kogito
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Letta
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Lytics
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Paragon
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Celigo
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Workato
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Nintex
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Talend
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Tray.io
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Boomi
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Jitterbit
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Salesforce Flows
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Automate.io
- Microsoft Power Automate vs SnapLogic
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Hightouch
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Nango
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Pipedream

