Automation Integration · head to head
Inngest vs Nango

Nango
Automation Integration
Open source unified API and OAuth infrastructure for product integrations, licensed under Elastic License 2.0
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Inngest hobby plans pause execution once free quota exhausted; upgrade required to continue; Nango the licence is Elastic License 2.0, which is source available rather than OSI open source, and it forbids offering Nango to third parties as a managed service, so anyone planning to resell or embed it in a platform for their own customers has a genuine legal problem.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Inngest and Nango actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Inngest
Nothing recorded that Nango does not also cover.
Only in Nango
- Managed OAuth
- Pre-built integrations
- Custom syncs and actions
- Incremental sync
- Rate limit and retry handling
- Webhooks
- Self-hosting
- Unified models
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Inngest
- Handling unpredictable LLM behavior with fine-grained error controlnot Nango
- Retrying failed workflow steps independently without restartingnot Nango
- Rate limiting per-tenant usage on shared infrastructurenot Nango
- Processing thousands of webhooks per event with replay capabilitynot Nango
- Persisting state across serverless function invocationsnot Nango
Nango
- A SaaS product that needs to ship twenty customer-facing integrations without hiring a team to maintain OAuth and token refresh for eachnot Inngest
- A team that needs a niche or internal API integrated, which closed unified API vendors will not build for themnot Inngest
- A company with data residency or security constraints that must self-host the integration layer rather than send customer tokens to a vendornot Inngest
- An engineering team replacing a homegrown integration service whose main cost is silent token expiry and rate limit failures in productionnot Inngest
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Inngest
- Hobby plans pause execution once free quota exhausted; upgrade required to continue
- Pro plan overages carry tiered metering: additional concurrent steps at $25 per 25, span data at $3/GB, scores at $1.50 per 1K, events at $0.50 per 1M
Nango
- The licence is Elastic License 2.0, which is source available rather than OSI open source, and it forbids offering Nango to third parties as a managed service, so anyone planning to resell or embed it in a platform for their own customers has a genuine legal problem.
- Pricing is per connection where a connection is one authorised end-user account, so cost scales linearly with your customer base and a product where each user links several services multiplies quickly beyond what a headline plan price suggests.
- Pre-built integrations vary in depth, and a connection that exists is not the same as a connection that covers the endpoints and objects your feature needs, so each one must be verified before it is designed into a roadmap.
- Custom syncs are written in TypeScript and run in Nango model, which means integration logic lives in a vendor runtime and migrating away later requires rewriting it rather than lifting it out.
- Self-hosting removes the vendor from the data path but transfers operational responsibility for a component that holds customer OAuth tokens, and few teams appreciate the security burden that comes with running that themselves.
Pricing, plan by plan
Inngest
Free- HobbyFree
- 50k executions/month
- 5 concurrent steps
- 500 MB span data
- Pro$99/month starting
- 1M executions included, pay-as-you-go up to 20M
- 100+ concurrent steps
- 5 GB span data ingested
- Enterprise$null/custom
- customizable metrics
- 90-day trace retention
- SAML, RBAC, audit trails
Nango
Free- FreeFree
- 10 connections
- Pre-built integrations
- Managed OAuth
- Starter$50/month
- 20 connections included
- 1 USD per additional connection
- Custom syncs and actions
- Growth$500/month
- 100 connections included
- 1 USD per additional connection
- Higher limits
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Quoted
- Custom connection volumes
- Security review and SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Nango if
- You need managed oauth.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker.
- You also want pre-built integrations.
Questions people ask
- Is Inngest or Nango better?
- Neither clearly leads. Inngest starts at Free and Nango at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Inngest or Nango?
- Inngest starts at Free and Nango at Free.
- Does Inngest or Nango run on more platforms?
- Inngest runs on Web. Nango runs on Web, Linux, Docker.
- Can I use Inngest for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Inngest best used for?
- Inngest is most often used for handling unpredictable llm behavior with fine-grained error control, retrying failed workflow steps independently without restarting, rate limiting per-tenant usage on shared infrastructure, processing thousands of webhooks per event with replay capability. Of those, handling unpredictable llm behavior with fine-grained error control and retrying failed workflow steps independently without restarting are not what Nango is typically brought in for.
- What can Inngest do that Nango cannot?
- Nango covers Managed OAuth, Pre-built integrations, Custom syncs and actions, Incremental sync.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Inngest: How much does Inngest cost?
Inngest offers a free Hobby plan with 50k executions per month and up to 3 users. Pro plans start at $99 per month with 1M executions included and support for up to 15 users. Additional Pro users cost $10 each. Enterprise plans require custom pricing.
SourceNango: Is Nango open source?
It is source available under Elastic License 2.0. You can read, modify and self-host it, but you cannot offer it to third parties as a managed service. That is not the same as an OSI approved open source licence.
Inngest: Is there a free version of Inngest?
Yes, the Hobby plan is completely free and includes 50k executions per month, 5 concurrent steps, 500 MB span data ingested, 10K scores, 500k events ingested, and support for up to 3 users. Plan changes pause execution once the free quota is exhausted.
SourceNango: How is it priced?
Per connection per month, where a connection is one authorised end-user account. Free to 10 connections, 50 dollars a month for Starter with 20, 500 for Growth with 100, and one dollar per additional connection.
Inngest: What are the overage costs on Inngest Pro?
Inngest Pro includes 1M executions with additional executions at $0.50 per 1M up to 20M. Span data overages cost $3 per GB, scores at $1.50 per 1K, and events at $0.50 per 1M. Additional concurrent steps cost $25 per 25 steps beyond the included 100+.
SourceNango: Can we integrate an API Nango does not support?
Yes. Custom syncs and actions in TypeScript cover any API including internal ones, which is the main advantage over closed unified API products.
Nango: Can we self-host it?
Yes, under the Elastic License 2.0 terms, which permit self-hosting for your own use but not resale as a service.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Inngest vs Hatchet
- Inngest vs n8n
- Inngest vs Zapier
- Inngest vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Inngest vs MuleSoft
- Inngest vs Temporal
- Inngest vs Trigger.dev
- Inngest vs Prefect
- Inngest vs Mage AI
- Inngest vs Windmill
- Inngest vs Browserbase
- Inngest vs Flowise
- Inngest vs Informatica
- Inngest vs Integromat
- Inngest vs jBPM
- Inngest vs Kogito
- Inngest vs Letta
- Inngest vs Lytics
- Inngest vs Alloy Automation
- Inngest vs Merge
- Inngest vs Paragon
- Inngest vs Meltano
- Inngest vs RudderStack
- Inngest vs Flowable
- Inngest vs Grouparoo
- Inngest vs Airbyte
- Inngest vs Cyclr
- Inngest vs Activiti
- Inngest vs Workato
- Inngest vs Automation Anywhere
- Inngest vs Blue Prism
- Inngest vs CrewAI
- Nango vs Hatchet
- Nango vs n8n
- Nango vs Zapier
- Nango vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Nango vs MuleSoft
- Nango vs Temporal
- Nango vs Trigger.dev
- Nango vs Prefect
- Nango vs Mage AI
- Nango vs Windmill
- Nango vs Browserbase
- Nango vs Flowise
- Nango vs Informatica
- Nango vs Integromat
- Nango vs jBPM
- Nango vs Kogito
- Nango vs Letta
- Nango vs Lytics
- Nango vs Alloy Automation
- Nango vs Merge
- Nango vs Paragon
- Nango vs Meltano
- Nango vs RudderStack
- Nango vs Flowable
- Nango vs Grouparoo
- Nango vs Airbyte
- Nango vs Cyclr
- Nango vs Activiti
- Nango vs Workato
- Nango vs Automation Anywhere
- Nango vs Blue Prism
- Nango vs CrewAI

