Automation Integration · head to head
Cyclr vs Mage AI

Cyclr
Automation Integration
Embedded integration platform that SaaS vendors ship inside their own product
- From
- $1595/month
- Rated
- -

Mage AI
Automation Integration
Data pipeline platform with AI-generated workflows and governance
- From
- $100/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cyclr entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.; Mage AI usage-based pricing lacks transparency for cost forecasting
- They diverge on capability: Cyclr covers White-label integration UI, Mage AI covers AI-generated workflows.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cyclr and Mage AI actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cyclr
- White-label integration UI
- Connector library
- Workflow builder
- Custom connectors
- Regional hosting
- MCP server offering
- Usage metering
- Templates
Only in Mage AI
- AI-generated workflows
- Pipeline building
- Data validation
- Workflow orchestration
- Automatic recovery
- Reusable components
- Governance controls
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cyclr
- A mid-market SaaS vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a CRM integration it has not builtnot Mage AI
- A product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectorsnot Mage AI
- A European software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the EU for procurement reasonsnot Mage AI
- A vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connectornot Mage AI
Mage AI
- Building and orchestrating data pipelines with visual interfacenot Cyclr
- Automating ETL workflows with AI assistancenot Cyclr
- Validating data quality across transformationsnot Cyclr
- Distributing transformed data to multiple destinationsnot Cyclr
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cyclr
- Entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.
- Connectors and API calls are metered separately, so a successful integration marketplace pushes you up tiers as your customers adopt it, meaning the cost rises with usage rather than with the revenue that usage generates.
- Custom connectors to APIs outside the library are your work to build and maintain, so the promise of not building integrations only holds for applications Cyclr already covers.
- Debugging is harder when the integration runs in a third-party runtime, because your support team sees a failed workflow rather than an HTTP response and has to escalate to Cyclr for anything non-obvious.
- Deep embedding creates real switching cost: your customers' live integrations run on Cyclr, so migrating later means recreating every customer workflow, which in practice means you rarely leave.
Mage AI
- Usage-based pricing lacks transparency for cost forecasting
- Limited standalone pricing details on website
- Requires contact for enterprise deployment options
- Smaller ecosystem compared to established competitors
- May require significant customization for complex data models
Pricing, plan by plan
Cyclr
$1595/month- PAYG$1595/month
- 100,000 API calls included
- 1 connector included
- Unlimited integrations and users
- Growth$2595/month
- 1,000,000 API calls included
- 10 connectors included
- Everything in PAYG
- Scale$7195/month
- 5,000,000 API calls included
- Unlimited connectors
- Everything in Growth
- Private Cloud$undefined/month
- Dedicated hosting in US, UK or EU
- Configurable processing and runtime
- Quoted pricing
Mage AI
$100/month- Cloud$100/month
- 1 development environment
- Unlimited users
- Usage-based infrastructure pricing
- Hybrid Cloud$null/custom
- Private data processing
- Custom infrastructure
- Contact sales
- Private Cloud$null/custom
- Complete isolation
- Full infrastructure control
- Contact sales
- On-Premises$null/custom
- Full local control
- Enterprise deployment
- Contact sales
Which should you pick?
Choose Cyclr if
- You need white-label integration ui.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want connector library.
Choose Mage AI if
- You need ai-generated workflows.
- You work on Cloud, Hybrid, Private Cloud, On-Premises.
- You also want pipeline building.
Questions people ask
- Is Cyclr or Mage AI better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cyclr starts at $1595/month and Mage AI at $100/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cyclr or Mage AI?
- Cyclr starts at $1595/month and Mage AI at $100/month.
- Does Cyclr or Mage AI run on more platforms?
- Cyclr runs on Web, API. Mage AI runs on Cloud, Hybrid, Private Cloud, On-Premises.
- What is Cyclr best used for?
- Cyclr is most often used for a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built, a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors, a european software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the eu for procurement reasons, a vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connector. Of those, a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built and a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors are not what Mage AI is typically brought in for.
- What can Cyclr do that Mage AI cannot?
- Cyclr covers White-label integration UI, Connector library, Workflow builder, Custom connectors. Mage AI covers AI-generated workflows, Pipeline building, Data validation, Workflow orchestration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cyclr: What does Cyclr actually cost?
Published tiers start at 1,595 US dollars per month for 100,000 API calls and one connector, rising to 7,195 for unlimited connectors and five million calls.
Mage AI: What is the starting price for Mage Cloud?
Cloud plan starts at $100/month for one development environment with unlimited users, plus usage-based compute charges.
SourceCyclr: Do my customers know they are using Cyclr?
No. The interface is white-labelled to appear as part of your product.
Mage AI: How is compute usage billed on Mage?
CPU is charged at $0.50 per hour and RAM at $0.50 per 4GB per hour of utilization.
SourceCyclr: Can I host it in the EU or UK?
Yes, on the private cloud tiers, which matters for European procurement requirements.
Cyclr: What if the connector I need does not exist?
You build a custom connector using Cyclr tooling, which is work you own rather than work the platform removes.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cyclr vs Tray.io
- Cyclr vs Celigo
- Cyclr vs Workato
- Cyclr vs Alloy Automation
- Cyclr vs Paragon
- Cyclr vs Nango
- Cyclr vs Merge
- Cyclr vs Hatchet
- Cyclr vs Zapier
- Cyclr vs MuleSoft
- Cyclr vs Dagster
- Cyclr vs Fivetran
- Cyclr vs Informatica
- Cyclr vs Integromat
- Cyclr vs jBPM
- Cyclr vs Kogito
- Cyclr vs Letta
- Cyclr vs Lytics
- Cyclr vs Prefect
- Cyclr vs Airbyte
- Cyclr vs Inngest
- Cyclr vs Dify
- Cyclr vs Meltano
- Cyclr vs Temporal
- Cyclr vs Blue Prism
- Cyclr vs CrewAI
- Cyclr vs Automation Anywhere
- Mage AI vs Tray.io
- Mage AI vs Celigo
- Mage AI vs Workato
- Mage AI vs Alloy Automation
- Mage AI vs Paragon
- Mage AI vs Nango
- Mage AI vs Merge
- Mage AI vs Hatchet
- Mage AI vs Zapier
- Mage AI vs MuleSoft
- Mage AI vs Dagster
- Mage AI vs Fivetran
- Mage AI vs Informatica
- Mage AI vs Integromat
- Mage AI vs jBPM
- Mage AI vs Kogito
- Mage AI vs Letta
- Mage AI vs Lytics
- Mage AI vs Prefect
- Mage AI vs Airbyte
- Mage AI vs Inngest
- Mage AI vs Dify
- Mage AI vs Meltano
- Mage AI vs Temporal
- Mage AI vs Blue Prism
- Mage AI vs CrewAI
- Mage AI vs Automation Anywhere
