Construction · head to head
Bluebeam Revu vs GCPay

Bluebeam Revu
Construction
PDF markup and collaboration for construction
- From
- $260/year
- Rated
- -

GCPay
Construction
Subcontractor pay application and lien waiver exchange for general contractors in North America
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bluebeam Revu hosting a Studio collaboration requires the $330 Core plan; the $260 Basics plan can only participate in one; GCPay the subcontractor is a compelled user who did not choose the tool, so adoption friction and support load fall on the general contractor, and small trades with one bookkeeper resent every extra portal.
- They diverge on capability: Bluebeam Revu covers PDF markup, GCPay covers Pay application workflow.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bluebeam Revu and GCPay actually diverge.
| Attribute | Bluebeam Revu | GCPay |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $260/year | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Android | Web |
| Founded | 2002 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bluebeam Revu
- PDF markup
- Document creation
- Measurement tools
- Cloud collaboration
- Takeoffs
- Procore
- PlanGrid
- Box
Only in GCPay
- Pay application workflow
- Lien waiver exchange
- Compliance tracking
- Change order management
- ePayments
- Retainage handling
- ERP integration
- Subcontractor portal
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bluebeam Revu
- Marking up and measuring construction drawings as PDFsnot GCPay
- Overlaying and comparing drawing revisionsnot GCPay
- Running takeoff quantities into Excel on the Complete plannot GCPay
GCPay
- A general contractor in a strict lien state that has been burned by a missing unconditional waiver and needs waiver status tied to each payment rather than filed in a shared drivenot Bluebeam Revu
- A contractor whose accounts payable team spends the first week of every month rekeying pay applications from PDF emails into Sage or Viewpointnot Bluebeam Revu
- An owner-facing GC that must produce a clean audit trail of who was paid what and when, with insurance compliance evidence attachednot Bluebeam Revu
- A construction group standardising on Autodesk Construction Cloud that wants payment application data in the same estate as the project recordnot Bluebeam Revu
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bluebeam Revu
- Hosting a Studio collaboration requires the $330 Core plan; the $260 Basics plan can only participate in one
- Quantity Link with Excel and batch automation are held back to the $440 Complete plan
- The $590 Max price is labelled introductory on the vendor's own pricing page, so it is not a settled rate
GCPay
- The subcontractor is a compelled user who did not choose the tool, so adoption friction and support load fall on the general contractor, and small trades with one bookkeeper resent every extra portal.
- Pricing is entirely quoted and keyed to annual subcontracted construction value, which means a contractor with a few very large subcontracts can pay far more than one with many small ones for identical functionality.
- The ePayment fee structure is decided per general contractor, so a subcontractor cannot predict its cost of getting paid across clients and may be charged on one job and not another for the same work.
- It is a payment and compliance system, not job costing; commitments still have to reconcile against the ERP, and integration gaps mean many contractors run a manual check anyway.
- Autodesk acquired parent Payapps in 2024, and the strategic direction is convergence with Autodesk Construction Cloud, so buyers on Procore or a non-Autodesk stack should ask directly what the roadmap commitment to their platform is.
Pricing, plan by plan
Bluebeam Revu
$260/year- Basics$260/year
- Per user, billed annually
- PDF creation, viewing, editing and markups
- Measure length and area
- Core$330/year
- Per user, billed annually
- 2D and 3D PDF markup tools
- Overlay and compare drawings
- Complete$440/year
- Per user, billed annually
- Dynamic Fill measurements
- Quantity Link with Excel
- Max$590/year
- Per user, billed annually, introductory pricing
- AI drawing reviews and comparisons
- AI multi-view stitching
GCPay
On request- GCPay for General Contractors$undefined/year
- Priced on project count, subcontractor count and annual subcontracted volume
- Unlimited free subcontractor accounts
- Lien waiver and compliance tracking
- ePayments and Waiver Exchange$undefined/month
- Per-transaction fee disclosed at submission
- General contractor may absorb the fee or pass it to the subcontractor
- Subcontractor must acknowledge the fee before submitting
Which should you pick?
Choose Bluebeam Revu if
- You need pdf markup.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want document creation.
Questions people ask
- Is Bluebeam Revu or GCPay better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bluebeam Revu starts at $260/year and GCPay at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bluebeam Revu or GCPay?
- Bluebeam Revu starts at $260/year and GCPay at On request.
- Does Bluebeam Revu or GCPay run on more platforms?
- Bluebeam Revu runs on Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Android. GCPay runs on Web.
- What is Bluebeam Revu best used for?
- Bluebeam Revu is most often used for marking up and measuring construction drawings as pdfs, overlaying and comparing drawing revisions, running takeoff quantities into excel on the complete plan. Of those, marking up and measuring construction drawings as pdfs and overlaying and comparing drawing revisions are not what GCPay is typically brought in for.
- What can Bluebeam Revu do that GCPay cannot?
- Bluebeam Revu covers PDF markup, Document creation, Measurement tools, Cloud collaboration. GCPay covers Pay application workflow, Lien waiver exchange, Compliance tracking, Change order management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bluebeam Revu: How much does Bluebeam Revu cost?
Bluebeam publishes four annual per user plans: Basics at $260, Core at $330, Complete at $440 and Max at $590 per user per year. Max is listed as introductory pricing.
SourceGCPay: Who pays for GCPay, the GC or the sub?
The general contractor pays the subscription. Subcontractor accounts are free. Only the optional ePayment and waiver exchange transaction fee can be passed to the subcontractor, and only with their acknowledgement.
Bluebeam Revu: What is the difference between Bluebeam Basics and Core?
Core adds specialty markup tools for 2D and 3D PDFs, measurement of perimeters, counts, angles and volume, drawing overlay and comparison, CAD plug-ins, and the ability to host Studio collaborations rather than only join them.
SourceGCPay: How much is the ePayment fee?
It is a flat per-transaction fee, disclosed at the point the pay application is submitted. GCPay has published a $15 figure for the ePayments and waiver exchange service, and the GC decides who bears it.
GCPay: Is GCPay owned by Autodesk?
Yes. Autodesk agreed to acquire Payapps, which trades as GCPay in North America and Payapps elsewhere, in January 2024.
GCPay: Does it replace our construction accounting system?
No. It handles the application, approval and compliance workflow and then pushes approved payments into your ERP.
GCPay: Can subcontractors export their own records?
Subcontractors can download their submitted applications and waivers, but the project record belongs to the general contractor's account, so a sub should keep its own copies rather than rely on continued portal access.
Related pages
More on Bluebeam Revu
Other head to heads
- Bluebeam Revu vs SketchUp
- Bluebeam Revu vs Procore
- Bluebeam Revu vs ArchiCAD
- Bluebeam Revu vs Autodesk Revit
- Bluebeam Revu vs Cubit Estimating
- Bluebeam Revu vs Openspace
- Bluebeam Revu vs On-Screen Takeoff
- Bluebeam Revu vs RIB CostX
- Bluebeam Revu vs Togal.AI
- Bluebeam Revu vs Trunk Tools
- Bluebeam Revu vs Egnyte
- Bluebeam Revu vs Kahua
- Bluebeam Revu vs HammerTech
- Bluebeam Revu vs Handoff
- Bluebeam Revu vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Bluebeam Revu vs Houzz Pro
- Bluebeam Revu vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- Bluebeam Revu vs Foundation Software
- Bluebeam Revu vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Bluebeam Revu vs Trimble Pay
- Bluebeam Revu vs Assignar
- Bluebeam Revu vs Siteline
- Bluebeam Revu vs Clearstory
- Bluebeam Revu vs Kojo
- Bluebeam Revu vs Adaptive
- Bluebeam Revu vs Document Crunch
- Bluebeam Revu vs ConstructConnect
- Bluebeam Revu vs Buildots
- Bluebeam Revu vs Buildxact
- Bluebeam Revu vs Chief Architect
- Bluebeam Revu vs CMiC
- Bluebeam Revu vs CoConstruct
- GCPay vs SketchUp
- GCPay vs Procore
- GCPay vs ArchiCAD
- GCPay vs Autodesk Revit
- GCPay vs Cubit Estimating
- GCPay vs Openspace
- GCPay vs On-Screen Takeoff
- GCPay vs RIB CostX
- GCPay vs Togal.AI
- GCPay vs Trunk Tools
- GCPay vs Egnyte
- GCPay vs Kahua
- GCPay vs HammerTech
- GCPay vs Handoff
- GCPay vs HCSS HeavyBid
- GCPay vs Houzz Pro
- GCPay vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- GCPay vs Foundation Software
- GCPay vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- GCPay vs Trimble Pay
- GCPay vs Assignar
- GCPay vs Siteline
- GCPay vs Clearstory
- GCPay vs Kojo
- GCPay vs Adaptive
- GCPay vs Document Crunch
- GCPay vs ConstructConnect
- GCPay vs Buildots
- GCPay vs Buildxact
- GCPay vs Chief Architect
- GCPay vs CMiC
- GCPay vs CoConstruct
