Construction · head to head
GCPay vs Trimble Pay

GCPay
Construction
Subcontractor pay application and lien waiver exchange for general contractors in North America
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Trimble Pay
Construction
Subcontractor billing and lien waiver automation, formerly sold as Flashtract
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GCPay the subcontractor is a compelled user who did not choose the tool, so adoption friction and support load fall on the general contractor, and small trades with one bookkeeper resent every extra portal.; Trimble Pay the Flashtract name is being retired in favour of Trimble Pay, so existing documentation, comparison articles and integration listings are split across two names and buyers should confirm which contract entity and which support channel applies
- They diverge on capability: GCPay covers Pay application workflow, Trimble Pay covers Automated pay applications.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GCPay and Trimble Pay actually diverge.
| Attribute | GCPay | Trimble Pay |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GCPay
- Pay application workflow
- Lien waiver exchange
- Change order management
- ePayments
- Retainage handling
- ERP integration
- Subcontractor portal
Only in Trimble Pay
- Automated pay applications
- State-specific lien waivers
- Waiver release on payment
- Lower-tier tracking
- Payments
- ERP posting
Both cover
- Compliance tracking
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GCPay
- A general contractor in a strict lien state that has been burned by a missing unconditional waiver and needs waiver status tied to each payment rather than filed in a shared drivenot Trimble Pay
- A contractor whose accounts payable team spends the first week of every month rekeying pay applications from PDF emails into Sage or Viewpointnot Trimble Pay
- An owner-facing GC that must produce a clean audit trail of who was paid what and when, with insurance compliance evidence attachednot Trimble Pay
- A construction group standardising on Autodesk Construction Cloud that wants payment application data in the same estate as the project recordnot Trimble Pay
Trimble Pay
- A general contractor whose accounts payable team rejects a third of subcontractor billings each month for arithmetic or form errorsnot GCPay
- A contractor working across several states that needs the right statutory waiver language selected automatically rather than from a shared template foldernot GCPay
- A company that has been quoted Oracle Textura and wants to compare the total cost when the fee falls on the contractor rather than on the tradesnot GCPay
- A contractor that needs the unconditional waiver to be released only after funds clear, so it is not holding a waiver that a court would treat as ineffectivenot GCPay
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GCPay
- The subcontractor is a compelled user who did not choose the tool, so adoption friction and support load fall on the general contractor, and small trades with one bookkeeper resent every extra portal.
- Pricing is entirely quoted and keyed to annual subcontracted construction value, which means a contractor with a few very large subcontracts can pay far more than one with many small ones for identical functionality.
- The ePayment fee structure is decided per general contractor, so a subcontractor cannot predict its cost of getting paid across clients and may be charged on one job and not another for the same work.
- It is a payment and compliance system, not job costing; commitments still have to reconcile against the ERP, and integration gaps mean many contractors run a manual check anyway.
- Autodesk acquired parent Payapps in 2024, and the strategic direction is convergence with Autodesk Construction Cloud, so buyers on Procore or a non-Autodesk stack should ask directly what the roadmap commitment to their platform is.
Trimble Pay
- The Flashtract name is being retired in favour of Trimble Pay, so existing documentation, comparison articles and integration listings are split across two names and buyers should confirm which contract entity and which support channel applies
- Pricing is not published, and because it is bought by the general contractor rather than charged to subcontractors, the whole cost lands in one budget line rather than being distributed across the supply chain
- It is billing and compliance only, so a contractor still needs a project management system for drawings and RFIs and a construction ERP for the general ledger, and the value depends heavily on the quality of those two integrations
- Lien waiver correctness is a legal question, and the system generates forms rather than giving advice, so a contractor operating in an unusual jurisdiction still needs counsel to confirm the templates match current statute
- Under Trimble the product now sits alongside other Trimble construction financial assets, and buyers signing multi-year terms should ask directly how it is positioned against Viewpoint and the rest of the Trimble construction portfolio
Pricing, plan by plan
GCPay
On request- GCPay for General Contractors$undefined/year
- Priced on project count, subcontractor count and annual subcontracted volume
- Unlimited free subcontractor accounts
- Lien waiver and compliance tracking
- ePayments and Waiver Exchange$undefined/month
- Per-transaction fee disclosed at submission
- General contractor may absorb the fee or pass it to the subcontractor
- Subcontractor must acknowledge the fee before submitting
Trimble Pay
On request- Trimble Pay$undefined/year
- Bought by the general contractor, typically priced by project volume or contract value under management
- Subcontractors are not charged a per-project usage fee
- ERP integration and onboarding scoped separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Trimble Pay if
- You need automated pay applications.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want state-specific lien waivers.
Questions people ask
- Is GCPay or Trimble Pay better?
- Neither clearly leads. GCPay starts at On request and Trimble Pay at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GCPay or Trimble Pay?
- GCPay starts at On request and Trimble Pay at On request.
- Does GCPay or Trimble Pay run on more platforms?
- GCPay runs on Web. Trimble Pay runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is GCPay best used for?
- GCPay is most often used for a general contractor in a strict lien state that has been burned by a missing unconditional waiver and needs waiver status tied to each payment rather than filed in a shared drive, a contractor whose accounts payable team spends the first week of every month rekeying pay applications from pdf emails into sage or viewpoint, an owner-facing gc that must produce a clean audit trail of who was paid what and when, with insurance compliance evidence attached, a construction group standardising on autodesk construction cloud that wants payment application data in the same estate as the project record. Of those, a general contractor in a strict lien state that has been burned by a missing unconditional waiver and needs waiver status tied to each payment rather than filed in a shared drive and a contractor whose accounts payable team spends the first week of every month rekeying pay applications from pdf emails into sage or viewpoint are not what Trimble Pay is typically brought in for.
- What can GCPay do that Trimble Pay cannot?
- GCPay covers Pay application workflow, Lien waiver exchange, Change order management, ePayments. Trimble Pay covers Automated pay applications, State-specific lien waivers, Waiver release on payment, Lower-tier tracking. Both handle Compliance tracking.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GCPay: Who pays for GCPay, the GC or the sub?
The general contractor pays the subscription. Subcontractor accounts are free. Only the optional ePayment and waiver exchange transaction fee can be passed to the subcontractor, and only with their acknowledgement.
Trimble Pay: Is Flashtract still sold under that name?
No. Trimble acquired Flashtract and now sells it as Trimble Pay. The flashtract.com content redirects into the Trimble product pages.
GCPay: How much is the ePayment fee?
It is a flat per-transaction fee, disclosed at the point the pay application is submitted. GCPay has published a $15 figure for the ePayments and waiver exchange service, and the GC decides who bears it.
Trimble Pay: Do subcontractors pay to use it?
No. The general contractor buys it. This is the main commercial difference from Oracle Textura, where subcontractors are billed a percentage of their contract value per project.
GCPay: Is GCPay owned by Autodesk?
Yes. Autodesk agreed to acquire Payapps, which trades as GCPay in North America and Payapps elsewhere, in January 2024.
Trimble Pay: Does it replace my accounting system?
No. It generates and approves the billing and the waivers, then posts to your construction ERP. You still need the ledger.
GCPay: Does it replace our construction accounting system?
No. It handles the application, approval and compliance workflow and then pushes approved payments into your ERP.
Trimble Pay: Does it handle lower-tier subcontractors?
Yes, it tracks sub-tier amounts and sworn statements against the prime commitment, which is the usual source of surprise lien exposure.
GCPay: Can subcontractors export their own records?
Subcontractors can download their submitted applications and waivers, but the project record belongs to the general contractor's account, so a sub should keep its own copies rather than rely on continued portal access.
Related pages
More on Trimble Pay
Other head to heads
- GCPay vs Foundation Software
- GCPay vs Procore
- GCPay vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- GCPay vs Assignar
- GCPay vs Siteline
- GCPay vs Clearstory
- GCPay vs Kojo
- GCPay vs Adaptive
- GCPay vs Document Crunch
- GCPay vs HammerTech
- GCPay vs ConstructConnect
- GCPay vs Buildots
- GCPay vs Buildxact
- GCPay vs Chief Architect
- GCPay vs CMiC
- GCPay vs CoConstruct
- GCPay vs Sage 300 Construction
- GCPay vs Bridgit Bravo
- GCPay vs BuildingConnected
- GCPay vs Levelset
- GCPay vs ALICE Technologies
- GCPay vs Billd
- GCPay vs HCSS HeavyBid
- GCPay vs Houzz Pro
- GCPay vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- GCPay vs JobTread
- GCPay vs Jonas Premier
- GCPay vs Kahua
- Trimble Pay vs Foundation Software
- Trimble Pay vs Procore
- Trimble Pay vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Trimble Pay vs Assignar
- Trimble Pay vs Siteline
- Trimble Pay vs Clearstory
- Trimble Pay vs Kojo
- Trimble Pay vs Adaptive
- Trimble Pay vs Document Crunch
- Trimble Pay vs HammerTech
- Trimble Pay vs ConstructConnect
- Trimble Pay vs Buildots
- Trimble Pay vs Buildxact
- Trimble Pay vs Chief Architect
- Trimble Pay vs CMiC
- Trimble Pay vs CoConstruct
- Trimble Pay vs Sage 300 Construction
- Trimble Pay vs Bridgit Bravo
- Trimble Pay vs BuildingConnected
- Trimble Pay vs Levelset
- Trimble Pay vs ALICE Technologies
- Trimble Pay vs Billd
- Trimble Pay vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Trimble Pay vs Houzz Pro
- Trimble Pay vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- Trimble Pay vs JobTread
- Trimble Pay vs Jonas Premier
- Trimble Pay vs Kahua
