Construction · head to head
Clearstory vs GCPay

Clearstory
Construction
Digital change order and time and materials tag exchange between subcontractors and general contractors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

GCPay
Construction
Subcontractor pay application and lien waiver exchange for general contractors in North America
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Clearstory value depends on the counterparty using it, so a subcontractor whose general contractors have not adopted it ends up running the digital process and the emailed one at the same time.; GCPay the subcontractor is a compelled user who did not choose the tool, so adoption friction and support load fall on the general contractor, and small trades with one bookkeeper resent every extra portal.
- They diverge on capability: Clearstory covers Digital time and materials tags, GCPay covers Pay application workflow.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Clearstory and GCPay actually diverge.
| Attribute | Clearstory | GCPay |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Clearstory
- Digital time and materials tags
- Review and signature routing
- Change order log
- Cost exposure reporting
- Field mobile capture
- Document export
Only in GCPay
- Pay application workflow
- Lien waiver exchange
- Compliance tracking
- Change order management
- ePayments
- Retainage handling
- ERP integration
- Subcontractor portal
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Clearstory
- A speciality subcontractor that regularly performs extra work and struggles to get tags signednot GCPay
- A general contractor tired of receiving a stack of disputed tags at project closeoutnot GCPay
- A project team that needs the value of pending extras visible during the job rather than after itnot GCPay
- A contractor standardising change documentation across trades on a large projectnot GCPay
GCPay
- A general contractor in a strict lien state that has been burned by a missing unconditional waiver and needs waiver status tied to each payment rather than filed in a shared drivenot Clearstory
- A contractor whose accounts payable team spends the first week of every month rekeying pay applications from PDF emails into Sage or Viewpointnot Clearstory
- An owner-facing GC that must produce a clean audit trail of who was paid what and when, with insurance compliance evidence attachednot Clearstory
- A construction group standardising on Autodesk Construction Cloud that wants payment application data in the same estate as the project recordnot Clearstory
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Clearstory
- Value depends on the counterparty using it, so a subcontractor whose general contractors have not adopted it ends up running the digital process and the emailed one at the same time.
- It documents extra work but does not settle it; a general contractor determined not to pay is not persuaded by better paperwork, only better positioned to be argued with.
- Field staff have to complete tags properly for the record to hold up, and the discipline required is the same discipline that was failing on paper.
- Poor connectivity in basements, plant rooms and lift shafts is exactly where extra work gets documented, so offline reliability needs testing before rollout rather than after.
- It overlaps with change management already present in Procore and similar platforms, so buyers must be clear about which system holds the authoritative log or they will maintain two.
GCPay
- The subcontractor is a compelled user who did not choose the tool, so adoption friction and support load fall on the general contractor, and small trades with one bookkeeper resent every extra portal.
- Pricing is entirely quoted and keyed to annual subcontracted construction value, which means a contractor with a few very large subcontracts can pay far more than one with many small ones for identical functionality.
- The ePayment fee structure is decided per general contractor, so a subcontractor cannot predict its cost of getting paid across clients and may be charged on one job and not another for the same work.
- It is a payment and compliance system, not job costing; commitments still have to reconcile against the ERP, and integration gaps mean many contractors run a manual check anyway.
- Autodesk acquired parent Payapps in 2024, and the strategic direction is convergence with Autodesk Construction Cloud, so buyers on Procore or a non-Autodesk stack should ask directly what the roadmap commitment to their platform is.
Pricing, plan by plan
Clearstory
On request- Clearstory$undefined/year
- Digital time and materials tags
- Change order log
- Mobile field capture
GCPay
On request- GCPay for General Contractors$undefined/year
- Priced on project count, subcontractor count and annual subcontracted volume
- Unlimited free subcontractor accounts
- Lien waiver and compliance tracking
- ePayments and Waiver Exchange$undefined/month
- Per-transaction fee disclosed at submission
- General contractor may absorb the fee or pass it to the subcontractor
- Subcontractor must acknowledge the fee before submitting
Which should you pick?
Choose Clearstory if
- You need digital time and materials tags.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want review and signature routing.
Questions people ask
- Is Clearstory or GCPay better?
- Neither clearly leads. Clearstory starts at On request and GCPay at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Clearstory or GCPay?
- Clearstory starts at On request and GCPay at On request.
- Does Clearstory or GCPay run on more platforms?
- Clearstory runs on Web, iOS, Android. GCPay runs on Web.
- What is Clearstory best used for?
- Clearstory is most often used for a speciality subcontractor that regularly performs extra work and struggles to get tags signed, a general contractor tired of receiving a stack of disputed tags at project closeout, a project team that needs the value of pending extras visible during the job rather than after it, a contractor standardising change documentation across trades on a large project. Of those, a speciality subcontractor that regularly performs extra work and struggles to get tags signed and a general contractor tired of receiving a stack of disputed tags at project closeout are not what GCPay is typically brought in for.
- What can Clearstory do that GCPay cannot?
- Clearstory covers Digital time and materials tags, Review and signature routing, Change order log, Cost exposure reporting. GCPay covers Pay application workflow, Lien waiver exchange, Compliance tracking, Change order management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Clearstory: Is Clearstory for subcontractors or general contractors?
Both, because the workflow crosses between them. The subcontractor originates the tag, the general contractor reviews it, and adoption works best when the general contractor mandates it.
GCPay: Who pays for GCPay, the GC or the sub?
The general contractor pays the subscription. Subcontractor accounts are free. Only the optional ePayment and waiver exchange transaction fee can be passed to the subcontractor, and only with their acknowledgement.
Clearstory: Does it replace change management in Procore?
It can, for time and materials tags and the change order log, but you must decide which system is authoritative. Running both without that decision creates reconciliation work.
GCPay: How much is the ePayment fee?
It is a flat per-transaction fee, disclosed at the point the pay application is submitted. GCPay has published a $15 figure for the ePayments and waiver exchange service, and the GC decides who bears it.
Clearstory: What happens on sites without signal?
Tags are captured on the device and synchronised later. Test that path with photographs attached before relying on it.
GCPay: Is GCPay owned by Autodesk?
Yes. Autodesk agreed to acquire Payapps, which trades as GCPay in North America and Payapps elsewhere, in January 2024.
GCPay: Does it replace our construction accounting system?
No. It handles the application, approval and compliance workflow and then pushes approved payments into your ERP.
GCPay: Can subcontractors export their own records?
Subcontractors can download their submitted applications and waivers, but the project record belongs to the general contractor's account, so a sub should keep its own copies rather than rely on continued portal access.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Clearstory vs Procore
- Clearstory vs eSUB
- Clearstory vs Raken
- Clearstory vs Document Crunch
- Clearstory vs Siteline
- Clearstory vs Bridgit Bravo
- Clearstory vs Kojo
- Clearstory vs Assignar
- Clearstory vs ConstructConnect
- Clearstory vs Reconstruct
- Clearstory vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Clearstory vs Adaptive
- Clearstory vs ALICE Technologies
- Clearstory vs B2W Estimate
- Clearstory vs Billd
- Clearstory vs Foundation Software
- Clearstory vs Trimble Pay
- Clearstory vs HammerTech
- Clearstory vs Buildots
- Clearstory vs Buildxact
- Clearstory vs Chief Architect
- Clearstory vs CMiC
- Clearstory vs CoConstruct
- GCPay vs Procore
- GCPay vs eSUB
- GCPay vs Raken
- GCPay vs Document Crunch
- GCPay vs Siteline
- GCPay vs Bridgit Bravo
- GCPay vs Kojo
- GCPay vs Assignar
- GCPay vs ConstructConnect
- GCPay vs Reconstruct
- GCPay vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- GCPay vs Adaptive
- GCPay vs ALICE Technologies
- GCPay vs B2W Estimate
- GCPay vs Billd
- GCPay vs Foundation Software
- GCPay vs Trimble Pay
- GCPay vs HammerTech
- GCPay vs Buildots
- GCPay vs Buildxact
- GCPay vs Chief Architect
- GCPay vs CMiC
- GCPay vs CoConstruct
