Construction · head to head
GCPay vs Kahua

GCPay
Construction
Subcontractor pay application and lien waiver exchange for general contractors in North America
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Kahua
Construction
Cloud platform for construction and capital projects
- From
- $400/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GCPay the subcontractor is a compelled user who did not choose the tool, so adoption friction and support load fall on the general contractor, and small trades with one bookkeeper resent every extra portal.; Kahua no standard pricing tiers published; all pricing is custom and quote-based
- They diverge on capability: GCPay covers Pay application workflow, Kahua covers Project management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GCPay and Kahua actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GCPay
- Pay application workflow
- Lien waiver exchange
- Compliance tracking
- Change order management
- ePayments
- Retainage handling
- ERP integration
- Subcontractor portal
Only in Kahua
- Project management
- Document control
- Collaboration
- Issue tracking
- Reporting
- Microsoft 365
- Slack
- Box
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GCPay
- A general contractor in a strict lien state that has been burned by a missing unconditional waiver and needs waiver status tied to each payment rather than filed in a shared drivenot Kahua
- A contractor whose accounts payable team spends the first week of every month rekeying pay applications from PDF emails into Sage or Viewpointnot Kahua
- An owner-facing GC that must produce a clean audit trail of who was paid what and when, with insurance compliance evidence attachednot Kahua
- A construction group standardising on Autodesk Construction Cloud that wants payment application data in the same estate as the project recordnot Kahua
Kahua
- Acting as the system of record for a capital construction program across the asset lifecyclenot GCPay
- Public agencies and program managers tracking portfolios of projectsnot GCPay
- General contractors standardising project delivery and cost control across active projectsnot GCPay
- Specialty contractors managing crews, work orders and project financialsnot GCPay
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GCPay
- The subcontractor is a compelled user who did not choose the tool, so adoption friction and support load fall on the general contractor, and small trades with one bookkeeper resent every extra portal.
- Pricing is entirely quoted and keyed to annual subcontracted construction value, which means a contractor with a few very large subcontracts can pay far more than one with many small ones for identical functionality.
- The ePayment fee structure is decided per general contractor, so a subcontractor cannot predict its cost of getting paid across clients and may be charged on one job and not another for the same work.
- It is a payment and compliance system, not job costing; commitments still have to reconcile against the ERP, and integration gaps mean many contractors run a manual check anyway.
- Autodesk acquired parent Payapps in 2024, and the strategic direction is convergence with Autodesk Construction Cloud, so buyers on Procore or a non-Autodesk stack should ask directly what the roadmap commitment to their platform is.
Kahua
- No standard pricing tiers published; all pricing is custom and quote-based
- Pricing varies by organization type, program or construction scale, selected package, and deployment environment
- Implementation costs for data migration, integrations, training, and configuration scoped separately and included in quote
Pricing, plan by plan
GCPay
On request- GCPay for General Contractors$undefined/year
- Priced on project count, subcontractor count and annual subcontracted volume
- Unlimited free subcontractor accounts
- Lien waiver and compliance tracking
- ePayments and Waiver Exchange$undefined/month
- Per-transaction fee disclosed at submission
- General contractor may absorb the fee or pass it to the subcontractor
- Subcontractor must acknowledge the fee before submitting
Kahua
$400/month- Professional$400/month
- Project management
- Document control
- Collaboration
- EnterpriseFree
- Advanced analytics
- Custom workflows
- API access
Which should you pick?
Choose Kahua if
- You need project management.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want document control.
Questions people ask
- Is GCPay or Kahua better?
- Neither clearly leads. GCPay starts at On request and Kahua at $400/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GCPay or Kahua?
- GCPay starts at On request and Kahua at $400/month.
- Does GCPay or Kahua run on more platforms?
- GCPay runs on Web. Kahua runs on Web, Ios, Android.
- What is GCPay best used for?
- GCPay is most often used for a general contractor in a strict lien state that has been burned by a missing unconditional waiver and needs waiver status tied to each payment rather than filed in a shared drive, a contractor whose accounts payable team spends the first week of every month rekeying pay applications from pdf emails into sage or viewpoint, an owner-facing gc that must produce a clean audit trail of who was paid what and when, with insurance compliance evidence attached, a construction group standardising on autodesk construction cloud that wants payment application data in the same estate as the project record. Of those, a general contractor in a strict lien state that has been burned by a missing unconditional waiver and needs waiver status tied to each payment rather than filed in a shared drive and a contractor whose accounts payable team spends the first week of every month rekeying pay applications from pdf emails into sage or viewpoint are not what Kahua is typically brought in for.
- What can GCPay do that Kahua cannot?
- GCPay covers Pay application workflow, Lien waiver exchange, Compliance tracking, Change order management. Kahua covers Project management, Document control, Collaboration, Issue tracking.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GCPay: Who pays for GCPay, the GC or the sub?
The general contractor pays the subscription. Subcontractor accounts are free. Only the optional ePayment and waiver exchange transaction fee can be passed to the subcontractor, and only with their acknowledgement.
Kahua: How much does Kahua cost?
Kahua does not publish standard pricing. Costs vary by organization type (Owners/Program Managers, General Contractors, Specialty Contractors), program scale, selected package, deployment environment, and implementation requirements. Customers must request pricing quotes.
SourceGCPay: How much is the ePayment fee?
It is a flat per-transaction fee, disclosed at the point the pay application is submitted. GCPay has published a $15 figure for the ePayments and waiver exchange service, and the GC decides who bears it.
Kahua: What package options does Kahua offer?
Kahua offers three main package categories: Owners and Program Managers, General Contractors, and Specialty Contractors. Additional specialty apps and suites including capital planning, analytics, asset management, and safety can extend the base solution.
SourceGCPay: Is GCPay owned by Autodesk?
Yes. Autodesk agreed to acquire Payapps, which trades as GCPay in North America and Payapps elsewhere, in January 2024.
Kahua: Are implementation and integration costs included in Kahua pricing?
Implementation details including data migration, integrations, training, and configuration are scoped based on requirements and clearly identified in the custom quote provided.
SourceGCPay: Does it replace our construction accounting system?
No. It handles the application, approval and compliance workflow and then pushes approved payments into your ERP.
GCPay: Can subcontractors export their own records?
Subcontractors can download their submitted applications and waivers, but the project record belongs to the general contractor's account, so a sub should keep its own copies rather than rely on continued portal access.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- GCPay vs Foundation Software
- GCPay vs Procore
- GCPay vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- GCPay vs Trimble Pay
- GCPay vs Assignar
- GCPay vs Siteline
- GCPay vs Clearstory
- GCPay vs Kojo
- GCPay vs Adaptive
- GCPay vs Document Crunch
- GCPay vs HammerTech
- GCPay vs ConstructConnect
- GCPay vs Buildots
- GCPay vs Buildxact
- GCPay vs Chief Architect
- GCPay vs CMiC
- GCPay vs CoConstruct
- GCPay vs SketchUp
- GCPay vs ArchiCAD
- GCPay vs Autodesk Revit
- GCPay vs Egnyte
- GCPay vs e-Builder
- GCPay vs Smartsheet Construction
- GCPay vs Oracle Aconex
- GCPay vs Bluebeam Revu
- GCPay vs Microsoft Project
- GCPay vs Houzz Pro
- GCPay vs Contractor Foreman
- GCPay vs Autodesk Construction Cloud
- Kahua vs Foundation Software
- Kahua vs Procore
- Kahua vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Kahua vs Trimble Pay
- Kahua vs Assignar
- Kahua vs Siteline
- Kahua vs Clearstory
- Kahua vs Kojo
- Kahua vs Adaptive
- Kahua vs Document Crunch
- Kahua vs HammerTech
- Kahua vs ConstructConnect
- Kahua vs Buildots
- Kahua vs Buildxact
- Kahua vs Chief Architect
- Kahua vs CMiC
- Kahua vs CoConstruct
- Kahua vs SketchUp
- Kahua vs ArchiCAD
- Kahua vs Autodesk Revit
- Kahua vs Egnyte
- Kahua vs e-Builder
- Kahua vs Smartsheet Construction
- Kahua vs Oracle Aconex
- Kahua vs Bluebeam Revu
- Kahua vs Microsoft Project
- Kahua vs Houzz Pro
- Kahua vs Contractor Foreman
- Kahua vs Autodesk Construction Cloud
