Construction · head to head
GCPay vs Kojo

GCPay
Construction
Subcontractor pay application and lien waiver exchange for general contractors in North America
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Kojo
Construction
Materials procurement and inventory for speciality trade contractors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GCPay the subcontractor is a compelled user who did not choose the tool, so adoption friction and support load fall on the general contractor, and small trades with one bookkeeper resent every extra portal.; Kojo benefits depend on distributors providing electronic catalogues and pricing, and a contractor whose main supplier will not participate is left keying quotes by hand.
- They diverge on capability: GCPay covers Pay application workflow, Kojo covers Field material requests.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GCPay and Kojo actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GCPay
- Pay application workflow
- Lien waiver exchange
- Compliance tracking
- Change order management
- ePayments
- Retainage handling
- ERP integration
- Subcontractor portal
Only in Kojo
- Field material requests
- Multi-supplier quoting
- Purchase order management
- Inventory and warehouse
- Committed cost visibility
- Enterprise resource planning integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GCPay
- A general contractor in a strict lien state that has been burned by a missing unconditional waiver and needs waiver status tied to each payment rather than filed in a shared drivenot Kojo
- A contractor whose accounts payable team spends the first week of every month rekeying pay applications from PDF emails into Sage or Viewpointnot Kojo
- An owner-facing GC that must produce a clean audit trail of who was paid what and when, with insurance compliance evidence attachednot Kojo
- A construction group standardising on Autodesk Construction Cloud that wants payment application data in the same estate as the project recordnot Kojo
Kojo
- An electrical or mechanical contractor where materials are close to half of job cost and buying happens dailynot GCPay
- A trade contractor that cannot see committed material cost against a job until the invoice arrivesnot GCPay
- A contractor consolidating purchasing across branches to negotiate better distributor pricingnot GCPay
- A subcontractor tracking warehouse stock and job transfers that currently live in a spreadsheetnot GCPay
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GCPay
- The subcontractor is a compelled user who did not choose the tool, so adoption friction and support load fall on the general contractor, and small trades with one bookkeeper resent every extra portal.
- Pricing is entirely quoted and keyed to annual subcontracted construction value, which means a contractor with a few very large subcontracts can pay far more than one with many small ones for identical functionality.
- The ePayment fee structure is decided per general contractor, so a subcontractor cannot predict its cost of getting paid across clients and may be charged on one job and not another for the same work.
- It is a payment and compliance system, not job costing; commitments still have to reconcile against the ERP, and integration gaps mean many contractors run a manual check anyway.
- Autodesk acquired parent Payapps in 2024, and the strategic direction is convergence with Autodesk Construction Cloud, so buyers on Procore or a non-Autodesk stack should ask directly what the roadmap commitment to their platform is.
Kojo
- Benefits depend on distributors providing electronic catalogues and pricing, and a contractor whose main supplier will not participate is left keying quotes by hand.
- It serves speciality trade contractors; general contractors procure subcontracts rather than materials and get almost nothing from it.
- Enterprise resource planning integration quality varies by system and version, so confirm the depth for your exact configuration rather than accepting the logo on the website.
- Field adoption is the whole game, and foremen who lose signal in a plant room or basement revert to phoning the office within days unless offline capture genuinely works.
- It changes purchasing process as well as software, so contractors whose buying authority is informal have to formalise who can commit money before the system produces clean data.
Pricing, plan by plan
GCPay
On request- GCPay for General Contractors$undefined/year
- Priced on project count, subcontractor count and annual subcontracted volume
- Unlimited free subcontractor accounts
- Lien waiver and compliance tracking
- ePayments and Waiver Exchange$undefined/month
- Per-transaction fee disclosed at submission
- General contractor may absorb the fee or pass it to the subcontractor
- Subcontractor must acknowledge the fee before submitting
Kojo
On request- Kojo$undefined/year
- Materials procurement workflow
- Supplier quoting and purchase orders
- Inventory tracking
Which should you pick?
Choose Kojo if
- You need field material requests.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want multi-supplier quoting.
Questions people ask
- Is GCPay or Kojo better?
- Neither clearly leads. GCPay starts at On request and Kojo at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GCPay or Kojo?
- GCPay starts at On request and Kojo at On request.
- Does GCPay or Kojo run on more platforms?
- GCPay runs on Web. Kojo runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is GCPay best used for?
- GCPay is most often used for a general contractor in a strict lien state that has been burned by a missing unconditional waiver and needs waiver status tied to each payment rather than filed in a shared drive, a contractor whose accounts payable team spends the first week of every month rekeying pay applications from pdf emails into sage or viewpoint, an owner-facing gc that must produce a clean audit trail of who was paid what and when, with insurance compliance evidence attached, a construction group standardising on autodesk construction cloud that wants payment application data in the same estate as the project record. Of those, a general contractor in a strict lien state that has been burned by a missing unconditional waiver and needs waiver status tied to each payment rather than filed in a shared drive and a contractor whose accounts payable team spends the first week of every month rekeying pay applications from pdf emails into sage or viewpoint are not what Kojo is typically brought in for.
- What can GCPay do that Kojo cannot?
- GCPay covers Pay application workflow, Lien waiver exchange, Compliance tracking, Change order management. Kojo covers Field material requests, Multi-supplier quoting, Purchase order management, Inventory and warehouse.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GCPay: Who pays for GCPay, the GC or the sub?
The general contractor pays the subscription. Subcontractor accounts are free. Only the optional ePayment and waiver exchange transaction fee can be passed to the subcontractor, and only with their acknowledgement.
Kojo: Is this for general contractors?
No. It is built for speciality trade contractors buying materials. General contractors procure subcontracts and would get little from it.
GCPay: How much is the ePayment fee?
It is a flat per-transaction fee, disclosed at the point the pay application is submitted. GCPay has published a $15 figure for the ePayments and waiver exchange service, and the GC decides who bears it.
Kojo: What if our suppliers will not connect?
You lose most of the quoting benefit and keep only the internal workflow. Check distributor participation before purchase, because it determines the return.
GCPay: Is GCPay owned by Autodesk?
Yes. Autodesk agreed to acquire Payapps, which trades as GCPay in North America and Payapps elsewhere, in January 2024.
Kojo: Does it work without signal on site?
Field requests are designed for site use, and offline behaviour should be tested with your own crews in your worst locations, because that is where adoption is won or lost.
GCPay: Does it replace our construction accounting system?
No. It handles the application, approval and compliance workflow and then pushes approved payments into your ERP.
GCPay: Can subcontractors export their own records?
Subcontractors can download their submitted applications and waivers, but the project record belongs to the general contractor's account, so a sub should keep its own copies rather than rely on continued portal access.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- GCPay vs Foundation Software
- GCPay vs Procore
- GCPay vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- GCPay vs Trimble Pay
- GCPay vs Assignar
- GCPay vs Siteline
- GCPay vs Clearstory
- GCPay vs Adaptive
- GCPay vs Document Crunch
- GCPay vs HammerTech
- GCPay vs ConstructConnect
- GCPay vs Buildots
- GCPay vs Buildxact
- GCPay vs Chief Architect
- GCPay vs CMiC
- GCPay vs CoConstruct
- GCPay vs Knowify
- GCPay vs Bridgit Bravo
- GCPay vs Handoff
- GCPay vs HCSS HeavyBid
- GCPay vs Houzz Pro
- GCPay vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- GCPay vs JobTread
- Kojo vs Foundation Software
- Kojo vs Procore
- Kojo vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Kojo vs Trimble Pay
- Kojo vs Assignar
- Kojo vs Siteline
- Kojo vs Clearstory
- Kojo vs Adaptive
- Kojo vs Document Crunch
- Kojo vs HammerTech
- Kojo vs ConstructConnect
- Kojo vs Buildots
- Kojo vs Buildxact
- Kojo vs Chief Architect
- Kojo vs CMiC
- Kojo vs CoConstruct
- Kojo vs Knowify
- Kojo vs Bridgit Bravo
- Kojo vs Handoff
- Kojo vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Kojo vs Houzz Pro
- Kojo vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- Kojo vs JobTread
