Construction · head to head
GCPay vs Siteline

GCPay
Construction
Subcontractor pay application and lien waiver exchange for general contractors in North America
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Siteline
Construction
Pay application and billing workflow built only for speciality subcontractors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GCPay the subcontractor is a compelled user who did not choose the tool, so adoption friction and support load fall on the general contractor, and small trades with one bookkeeper resent every extra portal.; Siteline it serves subcontractors only, so a general contractor evaluating it is looking at the wrong side of the transaction entirely.
- They diverge on capability: GCPay covers Pay application workflow, Siteline covers Pay application generation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GCPay and Siteline actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GCPay
- Pay application workflow
- Lien waiver exchange
- Compliance tracking
- Change order management
- ePayments
- Retainage handling
- ERP integration
- Subcontractor portal
Only in Siteline
- Pay application generation
- Lien waiver management
- Compliance document tracking
- Billing status visibility
- Accounting system integration
- Accounts receivable reporting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GCPay
- A general contractor in a strict lien state that has been burned by a missing unconditional waiver and needs waiver status tied to each payment rather than filed in a shared drivenot Siteline
- A contractor whose accounts payable team spends the first week of every month rekeying pay applications from PDF emails into Sage or Viewpointnot Siteline
- An owner-facing GC that must produce a clean audit trail of who was paid what and when, with insurance compliance evidence attachednot Siteline
- A construction group standardising on Autodesk Construction Cloud that wants payment application data in the same estate as the project recordnot Siteline
Siteline
- A trade contractor whose billing team rebuilds the same pay application in four different general contractor formats each monthnot GCPay
- A subcontractor losing a billing cycle to rejected applications over missing lien waiversnot GCPay
- A finance director trying to forecast collections across dozens of general contractors and retention balancesnot GCPay
- A growing subcontractor whose billing process depends entirely on one person and a spreadsheetnot GCPay
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GCPay
- The subcontractor is a compelled user who did not choose the tool, so adoption friction and support load fall on the general contractor, and small trades with one bookkeeper resent every extra portal.
- Pricing is entirely quoted and keyed to annual subcontracted construction value, which means a contractor with a few very large subcontracts can pay far more than one with many small ones for identical functionality.
- The ePayment fee structure is decided per general contractor, so a subcontractor cannot predict its cost of getting paid across clients and may be charged on one job and not another for the same work.
- It is a payment and compliance system, not job costing; commitments still have to reconcile against the ERP, and integration gaps mean many contractors run a manual check anyway.
- Autodesk acquired parent Payapps in 2024, and the strategic direction is convergence with Autodesk Construction Cloud, so buyers on Procore or a non-Autodesk stack should ask directly what the roadmap commitment to their platform is.
Siteline
- It serves subcontractors only, so a general contractor evaluating it is looking at the wrong side of the transaction entirely.
- It does not do job costing, project management or payroll, so it is an addition to your systems rather than a consolidation of them.
- Value depends on a clean integration to your construction accounting system, and contractors with heavily customised or elderly installations should confirm the connection before signing.
- General contractor portals and billing formats change without warning, and although the vendor absorbs that maintenance you still feel it as occasional friction in a month-end window with no slack.
- The billing team has to adopt it fully in the first month-end or they revert to spreadsheets under deadline pressure, which makes the implementation timing more delicate than the software suggests.
Pricing, plan by plan
GCPay
On request- GCPay for General Contractors$undefined/year
- Priced on project count, subcontractor count and annual subcontracted volume
- Unlimited free subcontractor accounts
- Lien waiver and compliance tracking
- ePayments and Waiver Exchange$undefined/month
- Per-transaction fee disclosed at submission
- General contractor may absorb the fee or pass it to the subcontractor
- Subcontractor must acknowledge the fee before submitting
Siteline
On request- Siteline$undefined/year
- Pay application workflow
- Lien waiver and compliance tracking
- Accounting system integration
Which should you pick?
Choose Siteline if
- You need pay application generation.
- You also want lien waiver management.
Questions people ask
- Is GCPay or Siteline better?
- Neither clearly leads. GCPay starts at On request and Siteline at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GCPay or Siteline?
- GCPay starts at On request and Siteline at On request.
- Does GCPay or Siteline run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is GCPay best used for?
- GCPay is most often used for a general contractor in a strict lien state that has been burned by a missing unconditional waiver and needs waiver status tied to each payment rather than filed in a shared drive, a contractor whose accounts payable team spends the first week of every month rekeying pay applications from pdf emails into sage or viewpoint, an owner-facing gc that must produce a clean audit trail of who was paid what and when, with insurance compliance evidence attached, a construction group standardising on autodesk construction cloud that wants payment application data in the same estate as the project record. Of those, a general contractor in a strict lien state that has been burned by a missing unconditional waiver and needs waiver status tied to each payment rather than filed in a shared drive and a contractor whose accounts payable team spends the first week of every month rekeying pay applications from pdf emails into sage or viewpoint are not what Siteline is typically brought in for.
- What can GCPay do that Siteline cannot?
- GCPay covers Pay application workflow, Lien waiver exchange, Compliance tracking, Change order management. Siteline covers Pay application generation, Lien waiver management, Compliance document tracking, Billing status visibility.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GCPay: Who pays for GCPay, the GC or the sub?
The general contractor pays the subscription. Subcontractor accounts are free. Only the optional ePayment and waiver exchange transaction fee can be passed to the subcontractor, and only with their acknowledgement.
Siteline: Does it replace our accounting system?
No. It reads from Sage 300 CRE, Vista, Foundation and similar systems and handles the billing workflow those systems handle poorly.
GCPay: How much is the ePayment fee?
It is a flat per-transaction fee, disclosed at the point the pay application is submitted. GCPay has published a $15 figure for the ePayments and waiver exchange service, and the GC decides who bears it.
Siteline: What should we measure in a trial?
Days sales outstanding and the number of rejected or delayed pay applications. The case is about cash timing, not headcount.
GCPay: Is GCPay owned by Autodesk?
Yes. Autodesk agreed to acquire Payapps, which trades as GCPay in North America and Payapps elsewhere, in January 2024.
Siteline: Is it useful for general contractors?
No. It is built for the party submitting pay applications, not the party receiving them.
GCPay: Does it replace our construction accounting system?
No. It handles the application, approval and compliance workflow and then pushes approved payments into your ERP.
GCPay: Can subcontractors export their own records?
Subcontractors can download their submitted applications and waivers, but the project record belongs to the general contractor's account, so a sub should keep its own copies rather than rely on continued portal access.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- GCPay vs Foundation Software
- GCPay vs Procore
- GCPay vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- GCPay vs Trimble Pay
- GCPay vs Assignar
- GCPay vs Clearstory
- GCPay vs Kojo
- GCPay vs Adaptive
- GCPay vs Document Crunch
- GCPay vs HammerTech
- GCPay vs ConstructConnect
- GCPay vs Buildots
- GCPay vs Buildxact
- GCPay vs Chief Architect
- GCPay vs CMiC
- GCPay vs CoConstruct
- GCPay vs Levelset
- GCPay vs eSUB
- GCPay vs Briq
- GCPay vs Billd
- GCPay vs Contractor Foreman
- Siteline vs Foundation Software
- Siteline vs Procore
- Siteline vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Siteline vs Trimble Pay
- Siteline vs Assignar
- Siteline vs Clearstory
- Siteline vs Kojo
- Siteline vs Adaptive
- Siteline vs Document Crunch
- Siteline vs HammerTech
- Siteline vs ConstructConnect
- Siteline vs Buildots
- Siteline vs Buildxact
- Siteline vs Chief Architect
- Siteline vs CMiC
- Siteline vs CoConstruct
- Siteline vs Levelset
- Siteline vs eSUB
- Siteline vs Briq
- Siteline vs Billd
- Siteline vs Contractor Foreman
