Surveys · head to head
Alchemer vs Matomo

Alchemer
Surveys
Survey and feedback platform for research teams
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Matomo has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Alchemer more expensive than the simple form builders, which is the fair comparison for a short survey; Matomo the self hosted Community Edition is free but excludes A/B testing, heatmaps, session recording, cohorts, crash analytics and multi channel attribution, all of which are paid plugins
- They diverge on capability: Alchemer covers Deep question logic, Matomo covers Web analytics.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Alchemer and Matomo actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Alchemer
- Deep question logic
- Wide question types
- Workflow automation
- Integrations
- Panel and distribution
- Reporting
Only in Matomo
- Web analytics
- Real-time reports
- Custom dimensions
- Goal tracking
- E-commerce tracking
- Google Search Console
- Privacy-focused
- Cloud deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Alchemer
- Research questionnaires too conditional for a simple form buildernot Matomo
- Teams needing survey data routed into Salesforce or a warehousenot Matomo
- Organisations wanting research depth without enterprise experience-platform pricingnot Matomo
Matomo
- Privacy focused web analytics as an alternative to Google Analyticsnot Alchemer
- Self hosting analytics so visitor data stays on owned infrastructurenot Alchemer
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Alchemer
- More expensive than the simple form builders, which is the fair comparison for a short survey
- The interface carries a long product history and is less immediately friendly than newer tools
- Advanced logic is powerful and correspondingly easy to misconfigure, and testing a complex survey is real work
- Named Alchemer since 2020, so much of the searchable material still says SurveyGizmo
Matomo
- The self hosted Community Edition is free but excludes A/B testing, heatmaps, session recording, cohorts, crash analytics and multi channel attribution, all of which are paid plugins
- Premium plugin bundles for self hosted installs run from 275 EUR a month for 4 users to 3,400 EUR for 50
- Cloud pricing is banded by monthly hits, and anything above 10 million requires contacting sales
- Self hosting places all operation and upgrades on the operator while still needing paid plugins for the advanced features
Pricing, plan by plan
Alchemer
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Alchemer review.
Matomo
Free- Self-hostedFree
- Open-source
- Full analytics
- Privacy-focused
Which should you pick?
Choose Alchemer if
- You need deep question logic.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want wide question types.
Choose Matomo if
- You need web analytics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, On-premise.
- You also want real-time reports.
Questions people ask
- Is Alchemer or Matomo better?
- Neither clearly leads. Alchemer starts at On request and Matomo at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Alchemer or Matomo?
- Matomo has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Alchemer and Free for Matomo.
- Does Alchemer or Matomo run on more platforms?
- Alchemer runs on Web, Cloud. Matomo runs on Web, On-premise.
- Can I use Matomo for free?
- Yes. Matomo has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Alchemer starts at On request.
- What is Alchemer best used for?
- Alchemer is most often used for research questionnaires too conditional for a simple form builder, teams needing survey data routed into salesforce or a warehouse, organisations wanting research depth without enterprise experience-platform pricing. Of those, research questionnaires too conditional for a simple form builder and teams needing survey data routed into salesforce or a warehouse are not what Matomo is typically brought in for.
- What can Alchemer do that Matomo cannot?
- Alchemer covers Deep question logic, Wide question types, Workflow automation, Integrations. Matomo covers Web analytics, Real-time reports, Custom dimensions, Goal tracking.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Alchemer: What does Alchemer cost?
Tiered annual subscriptions published on the vendor site. Check current rates there.
Matomo: How much does Matomo cost?
Matomo Cloud starts at EUR 29 per month for the Starter plan, which covers 50,000 hits per month. Matomo On-Premise has a free Community edition, with paid bundles from EUR 275 per month for up to 5M hits and 4 users.
SourceAlchemer: Is Alchemer the same as SurveyGizmo?
Yes. SurveyGizmo was renamed Alchemer in 2020, which is why older reviews and documentation use the former name.
Matomo: Is Matomo free?
The On-Premise Community edition is free forever with unlimited users and hits, supported through the forum only. Matomo Cloud is a paid service, though a free trial with access to all core features is offered.
SourceAlchemer: When is it worth more than a simple form builder?
When the questionnaire has real conditional logic, or when responses need to route into Salesforce or a data warehouse.
Matomo: What is the difference between Matomo Cloud and On-Premise?
Cloud plans include hosting, maintenance, automatic updates and daily backups, priced by monthly hits from EUR 29. On-Premise is self-hosted, free in its Community edition, with paid bundles adding support and higher user counts.
SourceMatomo: How many hits do the Matomo On-Premise bundles cover?
The Team bundle covers up to 5M hits per month and 4 users at EUR 275 per month. Business covers up to 30M hits and 20 users at EUR 1,450. Enterprise covers up to 100M hits and 50 users at EUR 3,400.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Alchemer vs Formstack
- Alchemer vs Zoho Survey
- Alchemer vs LimeSurvey
- Alchemer vs Qualtrics CoreXM
- Alchemer vs Zonka Feedback
- Alchemer vs Tally
- Alchemer vs Google Forms
- Alchemer vs Microsoft Forms
- Alchemer vs Sogolytics
- Alchemer vs Cognito Forms
- Alchemer vs Jotform
- Alchemer vs Retool
- Alchemer vs SurveyCTO
- Alchemer vs SurveyLegend
- Alchemer vs Wufoo
- Alchemer vs KoboToolbox
- Alchemer vs Paperform
- Alchemer vs Umami
- Alchemer vs Crazy Egg
- Alchemer vs Ruler Analytics
- Alchemer vs VWO
- Alchemer vs Northbeam
- Alchemer vs Countly
- Alchemer vs Fathom Analytics
- Alchemer vs Mautic
- Alchemer vs Attribution
- Alchemer vs Plausible
- Alchemer vs Freshpaint
- Alchemer vs Simple Analytics
- Alchemer vs Mailgun
- Alchemer vs Triple Whale
- Alchemer vs Adobe Analytics
- Alchemer vs Adverity
- Alchemer vs Bloomreach
- Alchemer vs CallRail
- Matomo vs Formstack
- Matomo vs Zoho Survey
- Matomo vs LimeSurvey
- Matomo vs Qualtrics CoreXM
- Matomo vs Zonka Feedback
- Matomo vs Tally
- Matomo vs Google Forms
- Matomo vs Microsoft Forms
- Matomo vs Sogolytics
- Matomo vs Cognito Forms
- Matomo vs Jotform
- Matomo vs Retool
- Matomo vs SurveyCTO
- Matomo vs SurveyLegend
- Matomo vs Wufoo
- Matomo vs KoboToolbox
- Matomo vs Paperform
- Matomo vs Umami
- Matomo vs Crazy Egg
- Matomo vs Ruler Analytics
- Matomo vs VWO
- Matomo vs Northbeam
- Matomo vs Countly
- Matomo vs Fathom Analytics
- Matomo vs Mautic
- Matomo vs Attribution
- Matomo vs Plausible
- Matomo vs Freshpaint
- Matomo vs Simple Analytics
- Matomo vs Mailgun
- Matomo vs Triple Whale
- Matomo vs Adobe Analytics
- Matomo vs Adverity
- Matomo vs Bloomreach
- Matomo vs CallRail

