Marketing · head to head
Ahrefs vs Onclusive

Ahrefs
Marketing
Backlink and keyword research platform run on its own web crawler, metered by credits since 2024
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Onclusive
Marketing
Media monitoring, journalist database and PR measurement assembled from six acquired companies
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Ahrefs has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Ahrefs the April 2024 move from unlimited usage to credits was a real downgrade for existing customers: Lite meters 1,000 credits per user per month and the data tools lock when they are gone, so heavy research on the entry plan now forces an upgrade to Standard at 249 USD.; Onclusive onclusive was assembled from at least six acquired companies inside about a year, and users still encounter different interfaces, inconsistent data definitions and separate support paths depending on which module they are in, so training and internal reporting are harder than a single-product vendor.
- They diverge on capability: Ahrefs covers Site Explorer, Onclusive covers Global media monitoring.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ahrefs and Onclusive actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Marketing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ahrefs
- Site Explorer
- Keywords Explorer
- Site Audit
- Rank Tracker
- Content Explorer
- Competitive analysis
- Backlink checker
- Keyword research
Only in Onclusive
- Global media monitoring
- Broadcast monitoring
- Social listening
- Media contacts database
- Newsroom and press office
- Sentiment and tone analysis
- Share of voice reporting
- Crisis detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ahrefs
- SEO researchnot Onclusive
- Competitor analysisnot Onclusive
- Content planningnot Onclusive
- Backlink analysisnot Onclusive
- Rank trackingnot Onclusive
Onclusive
- A multinational communications team that needs print, broadcast and online coverage across twenty markets reported in one dashboard rather than through three regional vendorsnot Ahrefs
- A public affairs team that must evidence share of voice against named competitors for a quarterly board reportnot Ahrefs
- A PR agency running press office and media enquiry workflow for several client brands from one systemnot Ahrefs
- A corporate affairs function that needs early warning on a coverage spike outside its own time zone, with broadcast clips retrievable for legal reviewnot Ahrefs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ahrefs
- The April 2024 move from unlimited usage to credits was a real downgrade for existing customers: Lite meters 1,000 credits per user per month and the data tools lock when they are gone, so heavy research on the entry plan now forces an upgrade to Standard at 249 USD.
- Pay-as-you-go credits are charged automatically once enabled, so a busy research month can produce an unbudgeted overage bill rather than a hard stop.
- Every paid tier includes exactly one user, and additional seats cost 40, 60 or 80 USD a month by tier, so a three-person team on Standard pays 369 USD a month rather than 249.
- Row caps bind before credit caps for many jobs: Lite returns at most 2,500 rows per report, which is not enough to export a mid-sized site backlink profile in one pass.
- Ahrefs states plainly that it never runs discounts and offers no free trial of the paid plans, so evaluation means paying a full month or working from the ownership-verified free tier.
- Rank Tracker updates weekly on every tier including Enterprise, so teams needing daily positions have to buy a separate tracker such as SE Ranking or Semrush.
- A growing share of capability is sold as add-ons rather than included: Report Builder at 99 USD a month, Content Kit from 99 USD, Project Boost at 20 or 200 USD per project, and Brand Radar from 199 USD.
Onclusive
- Onclusive was assembled from at least six acquired companies inside about a year, and users still encounter different interfaces, inconsistent data definitions and separate support paths depending on which module they are in, so training and internal reporting are harder than a single-product vendor.
- Pricing is not published and is scoped by market coverage, source count and user seats, which makes competitive benchmarking difficult and means renewal increases are hard to challenge without a parallel quote from Cision or Meltwater.
- Broadcast monitoring coverage is uneven by country, so a global contract can look complete on paper while a specific market you care about has thin local radio or regional television coverage; verify your priority markets by name before signing.
- The company carries private-equity ownership and acquisition-related debt financing, which historically in this category has meant pressure on support headcount and above-inflation renewal pricing rather than product investment.
- Automated sentiment classification on news copy remains error-prone, especially for irony, quoted criticism and industry jargon, so teams reporting sentiment to executives generally need a human review step that erodes the labour saving the tool was bought for.
Pricing, plan by plan
Ahrefs
Free- Ahrefs FreeFree
- Limited Site Explorer and Site Audit for sites you verify ownership of
- No access to competitor data
- Where paid subscriptions land after cancellation
- Starter$29/month
- Search and competitor data with reduced row limits
- No projects tier of the main plan ladder
- Sits below Lite on the published pricing page
- Lite$129/month
- 1 user included, up to 2 more at 40 USD each per month
- 1,000 credits per user per month, the only tier with a credit cap
- 5 projects, 750 tracked keywords, 6 months of historical data
- Standard$249/month
- 1 user included, up to 5 more at 60 USD each per month
- Unlimited report credits under fair use
- 20 projects, 2,000 tracked keywords, 2 years of historical data
Onclusive
On request- Onclusive$undefined/year
- Global media monitoring
- Broadcast and print coverage
- Onclusive Social listening
Which should you pick?
Choose Ahrefs if
- You need site explorer.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want keywords explorer.
Choose Onclusive if
- You need global media monitoring.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want broadcast monitoring.
Questions people ask
- Is Ahrefs or Onclusive better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ahrefs starts at Free and Onclusive at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ahrefs or Onclusive?
- Ahrefs has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Ahrefs and On request for Onclusive.
- Does Ahrefs or Onclusive run on more platforms?
- Ahrefs runs on Web. Onclusive runs on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- Can I use Ahrefs for free?
- Yes. Ahrefs has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Onclusive starts at On request.
- What is Ahrefs best used for?
- Ahrefs is most often used for seo research, competitor analysis, content planning, backlink analysis. Of those, seo research and competitor analysis are not what Onclusive is typically brought in for.
- What can Ahrefs do that Onclusive cannot?
- Ahrefs covers Site Explorer, Keywords Explorer, Site Audit, Rank Tracker. Onclusive covers Global media monitoring, Broadcast monitoring, Social listening, Media contacts database.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ahrefs: How much does Ahrefs cost?
Starter is 29 USD a month, Lite 129, Standard 249, Advanced 449 and Enterprise 1,499 with an annual commitment. Paying annually saves up to 17 percent, which Ahrefs describes as two months free, and it is arranged through support rather than on the site.
Onclusive: Is Onclusive one product or several?
Several. It was formed from Kantar Reputation Intelligence, PRgloo and the original Onclusive in January 2022, then absorbed Critical Mention and Digimind later that year, and the modules retain distinguishable lineages.
Ahrefs: What are Ahrefs credits and when did they start?
Ahrefs replaced unlimited report usage with credits in April 2024. It meters report credits, crawl credits and API units. Lite includes 1,000 credits per user per month; Standard and above are unlimited under a fair use policy. Purchased pay-as-you-go credits last three billing months.
Onclusive: Who owns it?
Symphony Technology Group, a US private equity firm, with debt financing on the Critical Mention acquisition from Stellus Capital Management.
Ahrefs: Is Ahrefs or Moz better?
Ahrefs has the deeper and fresher link index and stronger competitive research, and it is the default for link work. Moz is cheaper at entry, owns Domain Authority as a reportable metric, and has a real local listings product. If you report DA to clients or manage multi-location listings, Moz earns its place; otherwise Ahrefs wins on data.
Onclusive: What happened to Digimind?
Digimind was acquired in July 2022 and rebranded as Onclusive Social in October 2022. If social listening is your main requirement, that is the platform you are evaluating.
Ahrefs: Is there a free version or a trial?
There is Ahrefs Free, limited to Site Explorer and Site Audit on sites you verify you own, so it gives you no competitor data. Ahrefs states it never runs discounts and does not offer a trial of the paid plans.
Onclusive: Does it publish pricing?
No. Contracts are annual and quoted according to markets monitored, sources covered and seat count.
Ahrefs: How many users are included?
One, on every paid tier up to Advanced. Extra seats cost 40 USD a month on Lite, 60 on Standard, 80 on Advanced and 100 on Enterprise, and unpaid additional users are billed automatically as pay-as-you-go.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Ahrefs vs Moz
- Ahrefs vs Octoboard
- Ahrefs vs Buffer
- Ahrefs vs Hootsuite
- Ahrefs vs Vimeo
- Ahrefs vs Google Analytics
- Ahrefs vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Ahrefs vs CallRail
- Ahrefs vs Optimove
- Ahrefs vs Roxhill
- Ahrefs vs Swydo
- Ahrefs vs Mailgun
- Ahrefs vs Attribution
- Ahrefs vs Countly
- Ahrefs vs Fathom Analytics
- Ahrefs vs Matomo
- Ahrefs vs Plausible
- Ahrefs vs Northbeam
- Ahrefs vs Bloomreach
- Ahrefs vs Freshpaint
- Ahrefs vs Umami
- Ahrefs vs VWO
- Ahrefs vs MoEngage
- Ahrefs vs Adverity
- Ahrefs vs Whatagraph
- Ahrefs vs Optimizely
- Onclusive vs Moz
- Onclusive vs Octoboard
- Onclusive vs Buffer
- Onclusive vs Hootsuite
- Onclusive vs Vimeo
- Onclusive vs Google Analytics
- Onclusive vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Onclusive vs CallRail
- Onclusive vs Optimove
- Onclusive vs Roxhill
- Onclusive vs Swydo
- Onclusive vs Mailgun
- Onclusive vs Attribution
- Onclusive vs Countly
- Onclusive vs Fathom Analytics
- Onclusive vs Matomo
- Onclusive vs Plausible
- Onclusive vs Northbeam
- Onclusive vs Bloomreach
- Onclusive vs Freshpaint
- Onclusive vs Umami
- Onclusive vs VWO
- Onclusive vs MoEngage
- Onclusive vs Adverity
- Onclusive vs Whatagraph
- Onclusive vs Optimizely
