Marketing · head to head
Ahrefs vs Octoboard

Ahrefs
Marketing
Backlink and keyword research platform run on its own web crawler, metered by credits since 2024
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Octoboard
Marketing
Low-cost white-label client reporting and dashboards priced per connected client
- From
- €25/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Ahrefs has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Ahrefs the April 2024 move from unlimited usage to credits was a real downgrade for existing customers: Lite meters 1,000 credits per user per month and the data tools lock when they are gone, so heavy research on the entry plan now forces an upgrade to Standard at 249 USD.; Octoboard the interface and documentation are visibly less polished than AgencyAnalytics or Whatagraph, and agencies often spend longer than expected getting a first report to look presentable.
- They diverge on capability: Ahrefs covers Site Explorer, Octoboard covers White-label client portal.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ahrefs and Octoboard actually diverge.
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Marketing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ahrefs
- Site Explorer
- Keywords Explorer
- Site Audit
- Rank Tracker
- Content Explorer
- Competitive analysis
- Backlink checker
- Keyword research
Only in Octoboard
- White-label client portal
- Client-based pricing
- Automated SEO audits
- Business analytics
- Scheduled report delivery
- Data streaming and export
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ahrefs
- SEO researchnot Octoboard
- Competitor analysisnot Octoboard
- Content planningnot Octoboard
- Backlink analysisnot Octoboard
- Rank trackingnot Octoboard
Octoboard
- A freelancer or two-person agency that needs client-branded reports without a two hundred dollar monthly platform billnot Ahrefs
- An agency that wants white labelling in the entry tier rather than paying to unlock itnot Ahrefs
- A small SEO shop that wants automated site audits and channel reporting from one subscriptionnot Ahrefs
- An agency with a large but shallow client roster where per-client pricing beats per-data-source pricingnot Ahrefs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ahrefs
- The April 2024 move from unlimited usage to credits was a real downgrade for existing customers: Lite meters 1,000 credits per user per month and the data tools lock when they are gone, so heavy research on the entry plan now forces an upgrade to Standard at 249 USD.
- Pay-as-you-go credits are charged automatically once enabled, so a busy research month can produce an unbudgeted overage bill rather than a hard stop.
- Every paid tier includes exactly one user, and additional seats cost 40, 60 or 80 USD a month by tier, so a three-person team on Standard pays 369 USD a month rather than 249.
- Row caps bind before credit caps for many jobs: Lite returns at most 2,500 rows per report, which is not enough to export a mid-sized site backlink profile in one pass.
- Ahrefs states plainly that it never runs discounts and offers no free trial of the paid plans, so evaluation means paying a full month or working from the ownership-verified free tier.
- Rank Tracker updates weekly on every tier including Enterprise, so teams needing daily positions have to buy a separate tracker such as SE Ranking or Semrush.
- A growing share of capability is sold as add-ons rather than included: Report Builder at 99 USD a month, Content Kit from 99 USD, Project Boost at 20 or 200 USD per project, and Brand Radar from 199 USD.
Octoboard
- The interface and documentation are visibly less polished than AgencyAnalytics or Whatagraph, and agencies often spend longer than expected getting a first report to look presentable.
- Connector reliability is the recurring complaint in this price bracket, and a silently stale connection means a client receives a report with wrong numbers before anyone notices.
- Support is email based with no dedicated onboarding on the entry tiers, so a broken integration during a month-end reporting crunch can sit unresolved for days.
- Because pricing is per connected client, an agency serving few clients with many channels each pays for capacity it does not use compared with per-source pricing.
- Data retention and export options are thinner on lower tiers, so leaving Octoboard means losing report history rather than migrating it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Ahrefs
Free- Ahrefs FreeFree
- Limited Site Explorer and Site Audit for sites you verify ownership of
- No access to competitor data
- Where paid subscriptions land after cancellation
- Starter$29/month
- Search and competitor data with reduced row limits
- No projects tier of the main plan ladder
- Sits below Lite on the published pricing page
- Lite$129/month
- 1 user included, up to 2 more at 40 USD each per month
- 1,000 credits per user per month, the only tier with a credit cap
- 5 projects, 750 tracked keywords, 6 months of historical data
- Standard$249/month
- 1 user included, up to 5 more at 60 USD each per month
- Unlimited report credits under fair use
- 20 projects, 2,000 tracked keywords, 2 years of historical data
Octoboard
€25/month- Agencies$25/month
- Five connected clients
- Unlimited users, dashboards and reports
- White labelling and custom email domain included
Which should you pick?
Choose Ahrefs if
- You need site explorer.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want keywords explorer.
Choose Octoboard if
- You need white-label client portal.
- You also want client-based pricing.
Questions people ask
- Is Ahrefs or Octoboard better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ahrefs starts at Free and Octoboard at €25/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ahrefs or Octoboard?
- Ahrefs has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Ahrefs and €25/month for Octoboard.
- Does Ahrefs or Octoboard run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Ahrefs for free?
- Yes. Ahrefs has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Octoboard starts at €25/month.
- What is Ahrefs best used for?
- Ahrefs is most often used for seo research, competitor analysis, content planning, backlink analysis. Of those, seo research and competitor analysis are not what Octoboard is typically brought in for.
- What can Ahrefs do that Octoboard cannot?
- Ahrefs covers Site Explorer, Keywords Explorer, Site Audit, Rank Tracker. Octoboard covers White-label client portal, Client-based pricing, Automated SEO audits, Business analytics.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ahrefs: How much does Ahrefs cost?
Starter is 29 USD a month, Lite 129, Standard 249, Advanced 449 and Enterprise 1,499 with an annual commitment. Paying annually saves up to 17 percent, which Ahrefs describes as two months free, and it is arranged through support rather than on the site.
Octoboard: Is white labelling an upgrade?
No, it is included from the entry tier along with a custom email sending domain.
Ahrefs: What are Ahrefs credits and when did they start?
Ahrefs replaced unlimited report usage with credits in April 2024. It meters report credits, crawl credits and API units. Lite includes 1,000 credits per user per month; Standard and above are unlimited under a fair use policy. Purchased pay-as-you-go credits last three billing months.
Octoboard: How is it priced?
Per connected client per month, roughly five dollars or euros each, with the entry bundle covering five clients.
Ahrefs: Is Ahrefs or Moz better?
Ahrefs has the deeper and fresher link index and stronger competitive research, and it is the default for link work. Moz is cheaper at entry, owns Domain Authority as a reportable metric, and has a real local listings product. If you report DA to clients or manage multi-location listings, Moz earns its place; otherwise Ahrefs wins on data.
Octoboard: Are users charged?
No, users, dashboards and reports are unlimited on all tiers.
Ahrefs: Is there a free version or a trial?
There is Ahrefs Free, limited to Site Explorer and Site Audit on sites you verify you own, so it gives you no competitor data. Ahrefs states it never runs discounts and does not offer a trial of the paid plans.
Octoboard: Does it do SEO audits?
Yes, automated site crawls are built in and can be scheduled into client reports.
Ahrefs: How many users are included?
One, on every paid tier up to Advanced. Extra seats cost 40 USD a month on Lite, 60 on Standard, 80 on Advanced and 100 on Enterprise, and unpaid additional users are billed automatically as pay-as-you-go.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Ahrefs vs Moz
- Ahrefs vs Buffer
- Ahrefs vs Hootsuite
- Ahrefs vs Vimeo
- Ahrefs vs Google Analytics
- Ahrefs vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Ahrefs vs CallRail
- Ahrefs vs Optimove
- Ahrefs vs Roxhill
- Ahrefs vs Swydo
- Ahrefs vs Mailgun
- Ahrefs vs Attribution
- Ahrefs vs Countly
- Ahrefs vs Fathom Analytics
- Ahrefs vs Matomo
- Ahrefs vs Plausible
- Ahrefs vs Whatagraph
- Ahrefs vs CleverTap
- Ahrefs vs Microsoft Clarity
- Ahrefs vs Umami
- Ahrefs vs WebEngage
- Ahrefs vs Unbounce
- Ahrefs vs Woopra
- Ahrefs vs Wunderkind
- Octoboard vs Moz
- Octoboard vs Buffer
- Octoboard vs Hootsuite
- Octoboard vs Vimeo
- Octoboard vs Google Analytics
- Octoboard vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Octoboard vs CallRail
- Octoboard vs Optimove
- Octoboard vs Roxhill
- Octoboard vs Swydo
- Octoboard vs Mailgun
- Octoboard vs Attribution
- Octoboard vs Countly
- Octoboard vs Fathom Analytics
- Octoboard vs Matomo
- Octoboard vs Plausible
- Octoboard vs Whatagraph
- Octoboard vs CleverTap
- Octoboard vs Microsoft Clarity
- Octoboard vs Umami
- Octoboard vs WebEngage
- Octoboard vs Unbounce
- Octoboard vs Woopra
- Octoboard vs Wunderkind
