Marketing · head to head
Dreamdata vs Onclusive

Onclusive
Marketing
Media monitoring, journalist database and PR measurement assembled from six acquired companies
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Dreamdata has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Dreamdata company identification only reaches approximately 80% accuracy even with proprietary IP-to-company resolution; Onclusive onclusive was assembled from at least six acquired companies inside about a year, and users still encounter different interfaces, inconsistent data definitions and separate support paths depending on which module they are in, so training and internal reporting are harder than a single-product vendor.
- They diverge on capability: Dreamdata covers Multi-touch attribution, Onclusive covers Global media monitoring.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dreamdata and Onclusive actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Marketing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dreamdata
- Multi-touch attribution
- Account-based analytics
- Pipeline analytics
- Customer journey mapping
- Revenue modeling
- Content attribution
- Channel performance
- Data unification
Only in Onclusive
- Global media monitoring
- Broadcast monitoring
- Social listening
- Media contacts database
- Newsroom and press office
- Sentiment and tone analysis
- Share of voice reporting
- Crisis detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dreamdata
- B2B attributionnot Onclusive
- Revenue analyticsnot Onclusive
- Pipeline forecastingnot Onclusive
- Marketing ROInot Onclusive
Onclusive
- A multinational communications team that needs print, broadcast and online coverage across twenty markets reported in one dashboard rather than through three regional vendorsnot Dreamdata
- A public affairs team that must evidence share of voice against named competitors for a quarterly board reportnot Dreamdata
- A PR agency running press office and media enquiry workflow for several client brands from one systemnot Dreamdata
- A corporate affairs function that needs early warning on a coverage spike outside its own time zone, with broadcast clips retrievable for legal reviewnot Dreamdata
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dreamdata
- Company identification only reaches approximately 80% accuracy even with proprietary IP-to-company resolution
- Advanced features like custom attribution models require expensive custom pricing tier
- Steep implementation lift for complex multi-touch attribution setup
- Free tier limited to 2 months of historical data
Onclusive
- Onclusive was assembled from at least six acquired companies inside about a year, and users still encounter different interfaces, inconsistent data definitions and separate support paths depending on which module they are in, so training and internal reporting are harder than a single-product vendor.
- Pricing is not published and is scoped by market coverage, source count and user seats, which makes competitive benchmarking difficult and means renewal increases are hard to challenge without a parallel quote from Cision or Meltwater.
- Broadcast monitoring coverage is uneven by country, so a global contract can look complete on paper while a specific market you care about has thin local radio or regional television coverage; verify your priority markets by name before signing.
- The company carries private-equity ownership and acquisition-related debt financing, which historically in this category has meant pressure on support headcount and above-inflation renewal pricing rather than product investment.
- Automated sentiment classification on news copy remains error-prone, especially for irony, quoted criticism and industry jargon, so teams reporting sentiment to executives generally need a human review step that erodes the labour saving the tool was bought for.
Pricing, plan by plan
Dreamdata
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Dreamdata review.
Onclusive
On request- Onclusive$undefined/year
- Global media monitoring
- Broadcast and print coverage
- Onclusive Social listening
Which should you pick?
Choose Dreamdata if
- You need multi-touch attribution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want account-based analytics.
Choose Onclusive if
- You need global media monitoring.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want broadcast monitoring.
Questions people ask
- Is Dreamdata or Onclusive better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dreamdata starts at Free and Onclusive at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dreamdata or Onclusive?
- Dreamdata has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Dreamdata and On request for Onclusive.
- Does Dreamdata or Onclusive run on more platforms?
- Dreamdata runs on Web. Onclusive runs on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- Can I use Dreamdata for free?
- Yes. Dreamdata has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Onclusive starts at On request.
- What is Dreamdata best used for?
- Dreamdata is most often used for b2b attribution, revenue analytics, pipeline forecasting, marketing roi. Of those, b2b attribution and revenue analytics are not what Onclusive is typically brought in for.
- What can Dreamdata do that Onclusive cannot?
- Dreamdata covers Multi-touch attribution, Account-based analytics, Pipeline analytics, Customer journey mapping. Onclusive covers Global media monitoring, Broadcast monitoring, Social listening, Media contacts database.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Dreamdata: Is there a free tier for Dreamdata?
Yes. Dreamdata offers a free tier with 5 seats, 2 months of history, company identification, and web analytics included.
SourceOnclusive: Is Onclusive one product or several?
Several. It was formed from Kantar Reputation Intelligence, PRgloo and the original Onclusive in January 2022, then absorbed Critical Mention and Digimind later that year, and the modules retain distinguishable lineages.
Dreamdata: What CRM integrations does Dreamdata support?
Dreamdata integrates natively with Salesforce and HubSpot, pulling opportunity and account data to build attribution models.
SourceOnclusive: Who owns it?
Symphony Technology Group, a US private equity firm, with debt financing on the Critical Mention acquisition from Stellus Capital Management.
Dreamdata: Can I build custom attribution models in Dreamdata?
Yes. Custom attribution models are available on the Attribution Advanced plan, which requires contact for custom pricing.
SourceOnclusive: What happened to Digimind?
Digimind was acquired in July 2022 and rebranded as Onclusive Social in October 2022. If social listening is your main requirement, that is the platform you are evaluating.
Onclusive: Does it publish pricing?
No. Contracts are annual and quoted according to markets monitored, sources covered and seat count.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Dreamdata vs Ruler Analytics
- Dreamdata vs Northbeam
- Dreamdata vs Attribution
- Dreamdata vs Marketing Evolution
- Dreamdata vs Triple Whale
- Dreamdata vs CallRail
- Dreamdata vs Invoca
- Dreamdata vs June
- Dreamdata vs Madgicx
- Dreamdata vs Crazy Egg
- Dreamdata vs Whatagraph
- Dreamdata vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Dreamdata vs Netcore Cloud
- Dreamdata vs Octoboard
- Dreamdata vs Optimove
- Dreamdata vs Postmark
- Dreamdata vs Postscript
- Dreamdata vs Roxhill
- Dreamdata vs Buffer
- Dreamdata vs Hootsuite
- Dreamdata vs Bloomreach
- Dreamdata vs Freshpaint
- Dreamdata vs Umami
- Dreamdata vs VWO
- Dreamdata vs Moz
- Dreamdata vs MoEngage
- Dreamdata vs Adverity
- Dreamdata vs Optimizely
- Dreamdata vs Vimeo
- Dreamdata vs Countly
- Onclusive vs Ruler Analytics
- Onclusive vs Northbeam
- Onclusive vs Attribution
- Onclusive vs Marketing Evolution
- Onclusive vs Triple Whale
- Onclusive vs CallRail
- Onclusive vs Invoca
- Onclusive vs June
- Onclusive vs Madgicx
- Onclusive vs Crazy Egg
- Onclusive vs Whatagraph
- Onclusive vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Onclusive vs Netcore Cloud
- Onclusive vs Octoboard
- Onclusive vs Optimove
- Onclusive vs Postmark
- Onclusive vs Postscript
- Onclusive vs Roxhill
- Onclusive vs Buffer
- Onclusive vs Hootsuite
- Onclusive vs Bloomreach
- Onclusive vs Freshpaint
- Onclusive vs Umami
- Onclusive vs VWO
- Onclusive vs Moz
- Onclusive vs MoEngage
- Onclusive vs Adverity
- Onclusive vs Optimizely
- Onclusive vs Vimeo
- Onclusive vs Countly

