Softwr

Real Estate · head to head

Sell.Do vs VTS

Sell.Do logo

Sell.Do

Real Estate

Indian real estate CRM covering enquiry to registration, including unit inventory and post-sales collections

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
VTS logo

VTS

Real Estate

Leasing and asset management platform for commercial landlords, centralising deal pipeline, stacking plans and tenant activity with no published pricing

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Sell.Do no pricing is published, and the quote stacks a per-user fee with usage-billed AI, WhatsApp, SMS and telephony volumes, so the monthly bill is variable and hard to budget in advance.; VTS pricing is entirely unpublished, and reviewer sentiment specifically calls out cost as high for smaller teams or portfolios with limited leasing volume, meaning value is genuinely scale-dependent.
  • They diverge on capability: Sell.Do covers Lead aggregation, VTS covers Deal pipeline tracking.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Sell.Do and VTS actually diverge.

Attributes where Sell.Do and VTS differ
AttributeSell.DoVTS

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Real Estate).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Sell.Do

  • Lead aggregation
  • Telephony and call analysis
  • Unit inventory
  • Site visit management
  • Booking and agreement
  • Post-sales collections
  • Channel partner portal
  • Jarvis AI scoring

Only in VTS

  • Deal pipeline tracking
  • Stacking plans
  • Lease expiration management
  • Market intelligence
  • Broker collaboration tools
  • Portfolio reporting

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Sell.Do

  • An Indian residential developer whose bookings are tracked in a CRM but whose collections still live in Excelnot VTS
  • A developer running channel partner networks that must attribute a sale and a commission to the right partner months after the enquirynot VTS
  • A sales team buying leads from multiple portals and paid campaigns who cannot currently tell which source produces site visits rather than clicksnot VTS
  • A project launch where unit inventory must be visible and blockable live across a large sales floornot VTS

VTS

  • A landlord with dozens of properties needing real-time stacking plan visibility across the whole portfolionot Sell.Do
  • An asset manager tracking lease expirations months ahead to plan renewal or re-leasing strategynot Sell.Do
  • A large leasing team wanting centralised deal pipeline data shared with representing brokersnot Sell.Do
  • An institutional owner wanting portfolio-level leasing velocity reporting for investor updatesnot Sell.Do

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Sell.Do

  • No pricing is published, and the quote stacks a per-user fee with usage-billed AI, WhatsApp, SMS and telephony volumes, so the monthly bill is variable and hard to budget in advance.
  • The five-user minimum means small brokerages pay for seats they do not use.
  • Aurum PropTech now holds a majority stake of roughly 84 per cent, so product direction serves a listed parent with a wide proptech portfolio, and buyers should get roadmap and data-portability commitments in writing.
  • The product is written around Indian property practice, portals and payment structures, so it has little application outside India and no meaningful presence in other markets.
  • Deep configuration of inventory, price lists and approval workflow is required before go-live, so implementation is measured in weeks and depends on vendor availability rather than self-service setup.

VTS

  • Pricing is entirely unpublished, and reviewer sentiment specifically calls out cost as high for smaller teams or portfolios with limited leasing volume, meaning value is genuinely scale-dependent.
  • A single-building or small-portfolio owner gets comparatively little benefit from cross-portfolio features that are the platform core selling point, so the cost-to-value ratio is worse at small scale.
  • It manages leasing and asset data but is not a full property management or accounting system, so most landlords still run VTS alongside Yardi, MRI or a similar system rather than instead of one.
  • Broker adoption varies, so a landlord depending on shared deal tracking with external brokers has limited control over whether those brokers actually use the platform consistently.
  • As a data-centralisation tool, the value depends heavily on disciplined data entry from leasing staff, and inconsistent use degrades the stacking plan and pipeline accuracy the platform is sold on.

Pricing, plan by plan

Sell.Do

On request
  • Sell.Do$undefined/month
    • Per active user per month, minimum five users
    • Core CRM or full suite with inventory, channel partner, post-sales modules
    • AI features such as lead scoring and voice agents billed as usage on top

VTS

On request
  • VTS$undefined/year
    • No published pricing, quote required
    • Cost scales with portfolio size and building count
    • Separate landlord and broker-facing products

Which should you pick?

Choose Sell.Do if

  • You need lead aggregation.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want telephony and call analysis.
Sell.Do review

Choose VTS if

  • You need deal pipeline tracking.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want stacking plans.
VTS review

Questions people ask

Is Sell.Do or VTS better?
Neither clearly leads. Sell.Do starts at On request and VTS at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Sell.Do or VTS?
Sell.Do starts at On request and VTS at On request.
Does Sell.Do or VTS run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is Sell.Do best used for?
Sell.Do is most often used for an indian residential developer whose bookings are tracked in a crm but whose collections still live in excel, a developer running channel partner networks that must attribute a sale and a commission to the right partner months after the enquiry, a sales team buying leads from multiple portals and paid campaigns who cannot currently tell which source produces site visits rather than clicks, a project launch where unit inventory must be visible and blockable live across a large sales floor. Of those, an indian residential developer whose bookings are tracked in a crm but whose collections still live in excel and a developer running channel partner networks that must attribute a sale and a commission to the right partner months after the enquiry are not what VTS is typically brought in for.
What can Sell.Do do that VTS cannot?
Sell.Do covers Lead aggregation, Telephony and call analysis, Unit inventory, Site visit management. VTS covers Deal pipeline tracking, Stacking plans, Lease expiration management, Market intelligence.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Sell.Do: Who owns Sell.Do?

Aurum PropTech, a company listed on the Indian exchanges, holds a majority stake of around 84 per cent after increasing its shareholding.

VTS: Is VTS for tenants or landlords?

Landlords and their leasing and asset management teams. There is a separate broker-facing product, but tenants are not the customer.

Sell.Do: Does it handle post-booking collections?

Yes, construction-linked demand generation, receipts and outstanding follow-up are part of the product, which is the main reason developers choose it over a general CRM.

VTS: How much does VTS cost?

Pricing is not published anywhere; cost is quoted based on portfolio size and building count.

Sell.Do: What does it cost?

It is quote only, priced per active user per month with a five-user minimum, plus usage charges for AI, WhatsApp, SMS and telephony.

VTS: Does VTS replace property management software?

No. It manages leasing pipeline and asset data; landlords typically still run separate property management and accounting systems such as Yardi Voyager or MRI Software alongside it.

Sell.Do: Is it available outside India?

It is built for Indian property practice and portals. Buyers elsewhere will find the inventory, payment and compliance model does not match local process.

Share

Related pages

More on Sell.Do

More on VTS

Keep looking

Other head to heads